Identifying Individual Differences in Adolescent Neuropsychological Function Using the NIH Toolbox: An Application of Partially Ordered Classification Modeling

被引:0
作者
Honomichl, Ryan D. [1 ,7 ]
Taylor, H. Gerry [2 ,3 ]
Carr, Sarah J. A. [4 ,5 ]
Istrate, Ana E. [4 ]
Tatsuoka, Curtis [1 ,4 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Case Western Reserve Univ, Dept Populat & Quantitat Hlth Sci, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[2] Nationwide Childrens Hosp Res Inst, Biobehav Hlth Ctr, Columbus, OH USA
[3] Ohio State Univ, Dept Pediat, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[4] Case Western Reserve Univ, Dept Neurol, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[5] Kings Coll London, Inst Psychiat Psychol & Neurosci, Neuroimaging Dept, London, England
[6] Univ Hosp Cleveland Med Ctr, Neurol Inst, Cleveland, OH USA
[7] Cleveland Clin, Quantitat Hlth Sci, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
关键词
National Institutes of Heath Toolbox; cognitive tests; classification; partially ordered sets; model validation; WORKING-MEMORY; EXECUTIVE FUNCTIONS; SEQUENTIAL CLASSIFICATION; BRAIN-DEVELOPMENT; PROCESSING SPEED; CHILDHOOD; CHILDREN; COMPLEX; SKILLS; MATHEMATICS;
D O I
10.1037/neu0000573
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Objective: The Cognition Battery of the National Institutes of Heath Toolbox is a commonly utilized set of assessments of neuropsychological abilities, evaluating executive function, attention, working memory, processing speed, and episodic memory. We highlight the utility of an advanced statistical model in providing nuanced characterization of neurocognition in an adolescent population. We propose that partially ordered set (POSET) models are well suited to analyze polyfactorial tasks and identify distinct profiles of cognitive functioning. Method: Two models were considered using POSET classification. The first modeled 5 distinct cognitive functions and allowed for multiple functions to contribute to task performance. The second simpler model involved only 2 broader-based functions without polyfactorial task specifications. Existing performance data from 745 adolescents aged 14-17 years were analyzed. Posterior probabilities of classification performance and the discriminatory properties of the estimated response distributions indicated how well the modeling approaches fit the data. Results: The larger first model resulted in 8 profiles or states characterized by combinations of high or low functioning in 5 distinct functions. The simpler second model involved 2 broader-based functions that resulted in 4 states. Comparing model fit criteria, we believe that the finer-grained first model may better reflect the cognitive constructs associated with the tasks. Notably, POSET modeling did not always provide adequate classification of working memory because of the limited design of the Cognition Battery. Conclusions: We demonstrate that the use of POSET models is a feasible approach for detailed analysis of neurocognitive data that can extract information on cognitive functions, even when provided with limited task batteries.
引用
收藏
页码:996 / 1006
页数:11
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]   The NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery: Results From a Large Normative Developmental Sample (PING) [J].
Akshoomoff, Natacha ;
Newman, Erik ;
Thompson, Wesley K. ;
McCabe, Connor ;
Bloss, Cinnamon S. ;
Chang, Linda ;
Amaral, David G. ;
Casey, B. J. ;
Ernst, Thomas M. ;
Frazier, Jean A. ;
Gruen, Jeffrey R. ;
Kaufmann, Walter E. ;
Kenet, Tal ;
Kennedy, David N. ;
Libiger, Ondrej ;
Mostofsky, Stewart ;
Murray, Sarah S. ;
Sowell, Elizabeth R. ;
Schork, Nicholas ;
Dale, Anders M. ;
Jernigan, Terry L. .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 28 (01) :1-10
[2]   A structural analysis of working memory and related cognitive skills in young children [J].
Alloway, TP ;
Gathercole, SE ;
Willis, C ;
Adams, AM .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 87 (02) :85-106
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1992, BAYESIAN STAT
[4]   Working Memory: Theories, Models, and Controversies [J].
Baddeley, Alan .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 63, 2012, 63 :1-29
[5]   Norming plans for the NIH Toolbox [J].
Beaumont, Jennifer L. ;
Havlik, Richard ;
Cook, Karon F. ;
Hays, Ron D. ;
Wallner-Allen, Kathleen ;
Korper, Samuel P. ;
Lai, Jin-Shei ;
Nord, Christine ;
Zill, Nicholas ;
Choi, Seung ;
Yost, Kathleen J. ;
Ustsinovich, Vitali ;
Brouwers, Pim ;
Hoffman, Howard J. ;
Gershon, Richard .
NEUROLOGY, 2013, 80 :S87-S92
[6]   Relations between executive function and academic achievement from ages 5 to 17 in a large, representative national sample [J].
Best, John R. ;
Miller, Patricia H. ;
Naglieri, Jack A. .
LEARNING AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2011, 21 (04) :327-336
[7]   Executive Functioning Shows Differential Maturation From Early to Late Adolescence: Longitudinal Findings From a TRAILS Study [J].
Boelema, Sarai R. ;
Harakeh, Zeena ;
Ormel, Johan ;
Hartman, Catharina A. ;
Vollebergh, Wilma A. M. ;
van Zandvoort, Martine J. E. .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 28 (02) :177-187
[8]   Executive Functioning and Mathematics Achievement [J].
Bull, Rebecca ;
Lee, Kerry .
CHILD DEVELOPMENT PERSPECTIVES, 2014, 8 (01) :36-41
[9]   Development of the Updating Executive Function: From 7-Year-Olds to Young Adults [J].
Carriedo, Nuria ;
Corral, Antonio ;
Montoro, Pedro R. ;
Herrero, Laura ;
Rucian, Mercedes .
DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 52 (04) :666-678
[10]   Demographically Corrected Normative Standards for the English Version of the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery [J].
Casaletto, Kaitlin B. ;
Umlauf, Anya ;
Beaumont, Jennifer ;
Gershon, Richard ;
Slotkin, Jerry ;
Akshoomoff, Natacha ;
Heaton, Robert K. .
JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2015, 21 (05) :378-391