Teaching communication in general science degrees: highly valued but missing the mark

被引:13
作者
Stevens, Sarah [1 ]
Mills, Rebecca [1 ]
Kuchel, Louise [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Biol Sci, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
关键词
Science communication; science education; higher education; employability; graduate attributes; WRITTEN COMMUNICATION; GRADUATE ATTRIBUTES; SKILLS; EMPLOYABILITY; STUDENTS; AUSTRALIA; WHOLE;
D O I
10.1080/02602938.2019.1578861
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Effective communication of science is a ubiquitous learning outcome for most science degrees, and a national threshold learning outcome for science in Australia. Evidence suggests that employers and academics are dissatisfied with the communication skills of many science graduates. Our study examines communication tasks used in summative assessment in bachelor of science (BSc) degrees. We compiled public information for all units of study from the BSc programmes at five research-intensive Australian universities. Our analysis suggests that science academics place high value on developing the ability of students to communicate, with 66% of all science units (n = 1225) using one or more communication tasks as assessment (mean weighting 44%). However, opportunities for students to communicate in a variety of contexts are lacking. We found that communication tasks from eight majors (n = 683) across the five universities addressed a very narrow range of contexts; an audience of scientists (including students) in the same discipline (97%), in the mode of traditional writing (79%) and for the purpose of interpreting and presenting results (66%). As such, assessment practice does not match the variety of contexts required by the Australian threshold learning outcomes or guiding statements in other countries. We identify opportunities and offer practical recommendations to help correct this mismatch.
引用
收藏
页码:1163 / 1176
页数:14
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
American Chemical Society, 2016, TOP 10 TRENDS DRIV S
[2]  
Anderson L., 2009, TAXONOMY LEARNING TE
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2000, How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience and School: Expanded Edition
[4]  
[Anonymous], ROL IMP RES INT U CO
[5]  
ARKOUDIS S, 2015, WHAT WORKS BEST STRE
[6]  
Australian Council of Deans of Science, 2013, MATH SCI STAND STAT
[7]  
Baker S., 2017, Times Higher Education
[8]  
Bath D., 2004, HIGHER ED RES DEV, V23, P313, DOI DOI 10.1080/0729436042000235427
[9]  
Bean J.C., 2011, ENGAGING IDEAS PROFE
[10]  
Beaufort A, 2007, COLLEGE WRITING AND BEYOND: A NEW FRAMEWORK FOR UNIVERSITY WRITING INSTRUCTION, P1