Adaptive PrimalDual Genetic Algorithms in Dynamic Environments

被引:13
作者
Wang, Hongfeng [1 ]
Yang, Shengxiang [2 ]
Ip, W. H. [3 ]
Wang, Dingwei [1 ]
机构
[1] Northeastern Univ, Sch Informat Sci & Engn, Shenyang 110004, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Leicester, Dept Comp Sci, Leicester LE1 7RH, Leics, England
[3] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Ind & Syst Engn, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
来源
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS PART B-CYBERNETICS | 2009年 / 39卷 / 06期
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Adaptive dominant replacement scheme; dynamic optimization problem (DOP); genetic algorithm (GA); Lamarckian learning; primal-dual mapping (PDM); ELITISM-BASED IMMIGRANTS; OPTIMIZATION PROBLEMS; ASSOCIATIVE MEMORY;
D O I
10.1109/TSMCB.2009.2015281
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Recently, there has been an increasing interest in applying genetic algorithms (GAs) in dynamic environments. Inspired by the complementary and dominance mechanisms in nature, a primal-dual GA (PDGA) has been proposed for dynamic optimization problems (DOPs). In this paper, an important operator in PDGA, i.e., the primal-dual mapping (PDM) scheme, is further investigated to improve the robustness and adaptability of PDGA in dynamic environments. In the improved scheme, two different probability-based PDM operators, where the mapping probability of each allele in the chromosome string is calculated through the statistical information of the distribution of alleles in the corresponding gene locus over the population, are effectively combined according to an adaptive Lamarckian learning mechanism. In addition, an adaptive dominant replacement scheme, which can probabilistically accept inferior chromosomes, is also introduced into the proposed algorithm to enhance the diversity level of the population. Experimental results on a series of dynamic problems generated from several stationary benchmark problems show that the proposed algorithm is a good optimizer for DOPs.
引用
收藏
页码:1348 / 1361
页数:14
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1992, PARALLEL PROBLEM SOL
[2]  
Branke J, 2000, EVOLUTIONARY DESIGN AND MANUFACTURE, P299
[3]  
Branke J., 2002, EVOLUTIONARY OPTIMIZ
[4]  
Branke J., 1999, P IEEE C EVOLUTIONAR, P1875, DOI DOI 10.1109/CEC.1999.785502
[5]   Incremental multiple objective genetic algorithms [J].
Chen, Q ;
Guan, SU .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS PART B-CYBERNETICS, 2004, 34 (03) :1325-1334
[6]  
Cobb HelenG., 1990, INVESTIGATION USE HY
[7]  
Collard P., 1997, International Journal on Artificial Intelligence Tools (Architectures, Languages, Algorithms), V6, P665, DOI 10.1142/S0218213097000323
[8]   Dynamic multiobjective optimization problems: Test cases, approximations, and applications [J].
Farina, M ;
Deb, K ;
Amato, P .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2004, 8 (05) :425-442
[9]   Genetic algorithms for route discovery [J].
Gelenbe, Erol ;
Liu, Peixiang ;
Laine, Jeremy .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS PART B-CYBERNETICS, 2006, 36 (06) :1247-1254
[10]   A Competitive-Cooperative Coevolutionary Paradigm for Dynamic Multiobjective Optimization [J].
Goh, Chi-Keong ;
Tan, Kay Chen .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2009, 13 (01) :103-127