Impact of organic matter and speciation on the behaviour of uranium in submerged ultrafiltration

被引:81
作者
Semiao, Andrea J. C. [1 ]
Rossiter, Helfrid M. A. [1 ]
Schaefer, Andrea I. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Sch Engn, Edinburgh EH9 3JL, Midlothian, Scotland
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Uranium; Ultrafiltration; Organic Matter; Uranium-organic matter complexation; Adsorption; AQUEOUS-SOLUTIONS; HUMIC SUBSTANCES; FE(III) IONS; WATER; ACID; ADSORPTION; BIOSORPTION; REMOVAL; PH; COMPLEXES;
D O I
10.1016/j.memsci.2009.10.056
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Influence of organic matter (OM) on uranium removal mechanisms by ultrafiltration (UF) over a pH range of 3-11 was investigated. Humic, alginic and tannic acid were used as OM. it was found that uranium adsorbed strongly to the membrane while retention by size exclusion did not occur. Adsorption was dependent on pH and type of OM used. Speciation predictions performed using Visual Minteq explain some of these results. In the absence of OM, uranium primarily adsorbed to the membrane at pH 5 and 7 where UO2OH+ and UO2CO3 were the dominant species. In the presence of humic acid (HA), uranium adsorption increased in the acidic range, especially at pH 3 (from 11% to 74%) due to the complexation. The structure of alginic acid (AA) did not favour complexation with uranium and therefore did not have a significant influence on its behaviour in UF. The exception was at pH 3 where adsorption increased from 11% to 52%. At this pH no charge repulsion between the uranium species and the AA occurs and complexation is favoured. The highest effect on uranium adsorption was obtained in the presence of tannic acid (TA) at pH 10 and I I where adsorption increased from 20% up to 100%. Uranium is most likely forming complexes with the gallic acid fraction of the dissociated TA. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:174 / 180
页数:7
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]   Chemical reactions of uranium in ground water at a mill tailings site [J].
Abdelouas, A ;
Lutze, W ;
Nuttall, E .
JOURNAL OF CONTAMINANT HYDROLOGY, 1998, 34 (04) :343-361
[2]   EXAFS determinations of uranium structures: The uranyl ion complexed with tartaric, citric, and malic acids [J].
Allen, PG ;
Shuh, DK ;
Bucher, JJ ;
Edelstein, NM ;
Reich, T ;
Denecke, MA ;
Nitsche, H .
INORGANIC CHEMISTRY, 1996, 35 (03) :784-+
[3]  
Anselme C., 1996, Water treatment membrane processes, p2.1
[4]  
Bailey V., 1905, N AMER FAUNA, V25, P1, DOI DOI 10.3996/NAFA.25.0001
[5]   Atomic force microscopy of humic substances: Effects of pH and ionic strength [J].
Balnois, E ;
Wilkinson, KJ ;
Lead, JR ;
Buffle, J .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1999, 33 (21) :3911-3917
[6]   A review of soluble microbial products (SMP) in wastewater treatment systems [J].
Barker, DJ ;
Stuckey, DC .
WATER RESEARCH, 1999, 33 (14) :3063-3082
[7]   Adsorption and transport of uranium(VI) in subsurface media [J].
Barnett, MO ;
Jardine, PM ;
Brooks, SC ;
Selim, HM .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 2000, 64 (03) :908-917
[8]   Uranium speciation in waters of different uranium mining areas [J].
Bernhard, G ;
Geipel, G ;
Brendler, V ;
Nitsche, H .
JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS, 1998, 271 :201-205
[9]   FRACTIONAL PRECIPITATION OF HUMIC-ACID FROM COLORED NATURAL-WATERS [J].
BOURBONNIERE, RA ;
VANHALDEREN, T .
WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION, 1989, 46 (1-4) :187-198
[10]   A review of the biochemistry of heavy metal biosorption by brown algae [J].
Davis, TA ;
Volesky, B ;
Mucci, A .
WATER RESEARCH, 2003, 37 (18) :4311-4330