Evaluation of a pharmacist-led penicillin allergy de-labelling ward round: a novel antimicrobial stewardship intervention

被引:76
作者
Devchand, M. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Kirkpatrick, C. M. J. [4 ]
Stevenson, W. [1 ,2 ]
Garrett, K. [3 ]
Perera, D. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Khumra, S. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Urbancic, K. [1 ,2 ,3 ,5 ]
Grayson, M. L. [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Trubiano, J. A. [1 ,2 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Austin Hlth, Infect Dis Dept, POB 5555, Heidelberg, Vic, Australia
[2] Austin Hlth, Ctr Antibiot Allergy & Res, Heidelberg, Vic, Australia
[3] Austin Hlth, Pharm Dept, Heidelberg, Vic, Australia
[4] Monash Univ, Fac Pharm & Pharmaceut Sci, Ctr Med Use & Safety, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[5] Peter MacCallum Canc Ctr, Natl Ctr Infect Canc, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[6] Univ Melbourne, Austin Hlth, Dept Med, Parkville, Vic, Australia
关键词
ANTIBIOTIC ALLERGY; PROGRAM;
D O I
10.1093/jac/dkz082
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Background: Antibiotic allergy labels (AALs), reported by up to 25% of hospitalized patients, are a significant barrier to appropriate prescribing and a focus of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programmes. Methods: A prospective audit of a pharmacist-led AMS penicillin allergy de-labelling ward round at Austin Health (Melbourne, Australia) was evaluated. Eligible inpatients with a documented penicillin allergy receiving an antibiotic were identified via an electronic medical report and then reviewed by a pharmacist-led AMS team. The audit outcomes evaluated were: (i) AMS post-prescription review recommendations; (ii) direct de-labelling; (iii) inpatient oral rechallenge referral; (iv) skin prick testing/intradermal testing referral; and (v) outpatient antibiotic allergy clinic assessment. Results: Across a 5month period, 106 patients were identified from a real-time electronic prescribing antibiotic allergy report. The highest rate of penicillin allergy de-labelling was demonstrated in patients who were referred for an inpatient oral rechallenge with 95.2% (n=21) successfully having their penicillin AAL removed. From the 22 patients with Type A reactions, 63.6% had their penicillin AAL removed. We demonstrated a significant decrease in the prescribing of restricted antibiotics (defined as third-or fourth-generation cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones, glycopeptides, carbapenems, piperacillin/tazobactam, lincosamides, linezolid or daptomycin) in patients reviewed (pre 42.5% versus post 17.9%, P=0.0002). Conclusions: A pharmacist-led AMS penicillin allergy de-labelling ward round reduced penicillin AALs and the prescribing of restricted antibiotics. This model could be implemented at other hospitals with existing AMS programmes.
引用
收藏
页码:1725 / 1730
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [21] Old but not forgotten: Antibiotic allergies in General Medicine (the AGM Study)
    Trubiano, Jason A.
    Mangalore, Rekha Pai
    Baey, Yi-Wei
    Le, Duy
    Graudins, Linda V.
    Charles, Patrick G. P.
    Johnson, Douglas F.
    Aung, Ar Kar
    [J]. MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2016, 204 (07) : 1.e1 - 1.e7
  • [22] Optimizing preoperative prophylaxis in patients with reported β-lactam allergy: a novel extension of antimicrobial stewardship
    Vaisman, Alon
    McCready, Janine
    Hicks, Sandy
    Powis, Jeff
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2017, 72 (09) : 2657 - 2660