共 22 条
Evaluation of a pharmacist-led penicillin allergy de-labelling ward round: a novel antimicrobial stewardship intervention
被引:76
作者:
Devchand, M.
[1
,2
,3
,4
]
Kirkpatrick, C. M. J.
[4
]
Stevenson, W.
[1
,2
]
Garrett, K.
[3
]
Perera, D.
[1
,2
,3
]
Khumra, S.
[1
,2
,3
,4
]
Urbancic, K.
[1
,2
,3
,5
]
Grayson, M. L.
[1
,2
,6
]
Trubiano, J. A.
[1
,2
,5
,6
]
机构:
[1] Austin Hlth, Infect Dis Dept, POB 5555, Heidelberg, Vic, Australia
[2] Austin Hlth, Ctr Antibiot Allergy & Res, Heidelberg, Vic, Australia
[3] Austin Hlth, Pharm Dept, Heidelberg, Vic, Australia
[4] Monash Univ, Fac Pharm & Pharmaceut Sci, Ctr Med Use & Safety, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[5] Peter MacCallum Canc Ctr, Natl Ctr Infect Canc, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[6] Univ Melbourne, Austin Hlth, Dept Med, Parkville, Vic, Australia
关键词:
ANTIBIOTIC ALLERGY;
PROGRAM;
D O I:
10.1093/jac/dkz082
中图分类号:
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号:
100401 ;
摘要:
Background: Antibiotic allergy labels (AALs), reported by up to 25% of hospitalized patients, are a significant barrier to appropriate prescribing and a focus of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programmes. Methods: A prospective audit of a pharmacist-led AMS penicillin allergy de-labelling ward round at Austin Health (Melbourne, Australia) was evaluated. Eligible inpatients with a documented penicillin allergy receiving an antibiotic were identified via an electronic medical report and then reviewed by a pharmacist-led AMS team. The audit outcomes evaluated were: (i) AMS post-prescription review recommendations; (ii) direct de-labelling; (iii) inpatient oral rechallenge referral; (iv) skin prick testing/intradermal testing referral; and (v) outpatient antibiotic allergy clinic assessment. Results: Across a 5month period, 106 patients were identified from a real-time electronic prescribing antibiotic allergy report. The highest rate of penicillin allergy de-labelling was demonstrated in patients who were referred for an inpatient oral rechallenge with 95.2% (n=21) successfully having their penicillin AAL removed. From the 22 patients with Type A reactions, 63.6% had their penicillin AAL removed. We demonstrated a significant decrease in the prescribing of restricted antibiotics (defined as third-or fourth-generation cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones, glycopeptides, carbapenems, piperacillin/tazobactam, lincosamides, linezolid or daptomycin) in patients reviewed (pre 42.5% versus post 17.9%, P=0.0002). Conclusions: A pharmacist-led AMS penicillin allergy de-labelling ward round reduced penicillin AALs and the prescribing of restricted antibiotics. This model could be implemented at other hospitals with existing AMS programmes.
引用
收藏
页码:1725 / 1730
页数:6
相关论文