Enterprise Resource Planning Systems and XBRL Reporting Quality

被引:4
作者
Guo, Feng [1 ]
Luo, Xin [2 ]
Wheeler, Patrick R. [3 ]
Yang, Liu [4 ]
Zhao, Xinlei [5 ]
Zhang, Yiyang [6 ]
机构
[1] Iowa State Univ, Debbie & Jerry Ivy Coll Business, Dept Accounting, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[2] Marquette Univ, Coll Business Adm, Dept Accounting, Milwaukee, WI 53233 USA
[3] Florida Gulf Coast Univ, Lutgert Coll Business Leadership, Dept Accounting, Ft Myers, FL USA
[4] Southeast Missouri State Univ, Coll Business & Comp, Dept Accounting Econ & Finance, Cape Girardeau, MO 63701 USA
[5] Univ Toledo, Coll Business & Innovat, Dept Accounting, 2801 W Bancroft St, Toledo, OH 43606 USA
[6] Youngstown State Univ, Williamson Coll Business Adm, Dept Accounting, Youngstown, OH 44555 USA
关键词
enterprise resource planning systems; XBRL; information environment; comparability;
D O I
10.2308/ISYS-2020-007
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems are indispensable for a majority of larger and midsize firms, and have changed the way accounting information is collected, stored, processed, and disseminated. Although most ERP systems integrate an eXtensible Business Reporting Language ( XBRL) component in their core modules, little research has examined how ERP systems affect the quality of XBRL filings. Using unique data from branchlevel ERP implementation, we find that the degree of ERP adoption among a firm's branches is negatively associated with the firm's XBRL filing errors and positively associated with XBRL reporting comparability, which in turn facilitates external users' access to the firm's XBRL filings in the SEC's EDGAR. These results suggest that ERP systems improve XBRL reporting quality. Moreover, our results indicate that ERP can mitigate the negative effect of extension taxonomies on XBRL reporting quality, which highlights the importance of the ERP system in a complicated XBRL reporting environment.
引用
收藏
页码:77 / 106
页数:30
相关论文
共 82 条
[31]  
Furneaux B, 2010, INTEGR SER INFORM SY, V28, P87, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-6108-2_5
[32]  
Garbellotto G., 2006, STRATEGIC FINANCE, V88, P53
[33]   TASK-TECHNOLOGY FIT AND INDIVIDUAL-PERFORMANCE [J].
GOODHUE, DL ;
THOMPSON, RL .
MIS QUARTERLY, 1995, 19 (02) :213-236
[34]   A Review of ERP Research: A FutureAgenda for Accounting Information Systems [J].
Grabski, Severin V. ;
Leech, Stewart A. ;
Schmidt, Pamela J. .
JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2011, 25 (01) :37-78
[35]   XBRL: Solving real-world problems [J].
Gray G.L. ;
Miller D.W. .
International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 2009, 6 (3) :207-223
[36]  
Harris T., 2013, An evaluation of the current state and future of XBRL and interactive data for investors and analysts
[37]   Investment in Enterprise Resource Planning: Business impact and productivity measures [J].
Hitt, LM ;
Wu, DJ ;
Zhou, XG .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2002, 19 (01) :71-98
[38]   Does search-facilitating technology improve the transparency of financial reporting? [J].
Hodge, FD ;
Kennedy, JJ ;
Maines, LA .
ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2004, 79 (03) :687-703
[39]   Measuring Accounting Reporting Complexity with XBRL [J].
Hoitash, Rani ;
Hoitash, Udi .
ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2018, 93 (01) :259-287
[40]   Corporate Governance and Internal Control over Financial Reporting: A Comparison of Regulatory Regimes [J].
Hoitash, Udi ;
Hoitash, Rani ;
Bedard, Jean C. .
ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2009, 84 (03) :839-867