Does basic energy access generate socioeconomic benefits? A field experiment with off-grid solar power in India

被引:89
作者
Aklin, Michael [1 ]
Bayer, Patrick [2 ]
Harish, S. P. [3 ,4 ]
Urpelainen, Johannes [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Polit Sci, 4600 Wesley W Posvar Hall, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[2] Univ Glasgow, Sch Social & Polit Sci, Adam Smith Bldg,40 Bute Gardens, Glasgow G12 8RT, Lanark, Scotland
[3] NYU, Dept Polit, 19 West 4th St, New York, NY 10009 USA
[4] McGill Univ, Inst Study Int Dev, 3460 McTavish St, Montreal, PQ H3A 0E6, Canada
[5] Columbia Univ, Dept Polit Sci, 420 West 118th St,712 IAB, New York, NY 10027 USA
关键词
ELECTRIFICATION; SYSTEMS; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1126/sciadv.1602153
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
This article assesses the socioeconomic effects of solar microgrids. The lack of access to electricity is a major obstacle to the socioeconomic development of more than a billion people. Off-grid solar technologies hold potential as an affordable and clean solution to satisfy basic electricity needs. We conducted a randomized field experiment in India to estimate the causal effect of off-grid solar power on electricity access and broader socioeconomic development of 1281 rural households. Within a year, electrification rates in the treatment group increased by 29 to 36 percentage points. Daily hours of access to electricity increased only by 0.99 to 1.42 hours, and the confidence intervals are wide. Kerosene expenditure on the black market decreased by 47 to 49 rupees per month. Despite these strong electrification and expenditure effects, we found no systematic evidence for changes in savings, spending, business creation, time spent working or studying, or other broader indicators of socioeconomic development.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
Aklin M, 2016, NAT ENERGY, V1, DOI [10.1038/nenergy.2016.170, 10.1038/NENERGY.2016.170]
[2]   Decentralized energy systems for clean electricity access [J].
Alstone, Peter ;
Gershenson, Dimitry ;
Kammen, Daniel M. .
NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2015, 5 (04) :305-314
[3]  
Angrist JD, 2009, MOSTLY HARMLESS ECONOMETRICS: AN EMPIRICISTS COMPANION, P1
[4]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[5]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[6]  
Barkat Abul., 2002, Economic and Social Impact Evaluation Study of the Rural Electrification Program in Bangladesh
[7]  
Barnes DF, 2014, ELECT POWER RURAL GR
[8]   Earthquakes, Religion, and Transition to Self-Government in Italian Cities [J].
Belloc, Marianna ;
Drago, Francesco ;
Galbiati, Roberto .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2016, 131 (04) :1875-1926
[9]   CONTROLLING THE FALSE DISCOVERY RATE - A PRACTICAL AND POWERFUL APPROACH TO MULTIPLE TESTING [J].
BENJAMINI, Y ;
HOCHBERG, Y .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 1995, 57 (01) :289-300
[10]   Impact Analysis of Rural Electrification Projects in Sub-Saharan Africa [J].
Bernard, Tanguy .
WORLD BANK RESEARCH OBSERVER, 2012, 27 (01) :33-51