Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship Modeling of Rat Acute Toxicity by Oral Exposure

被引:198
作者
Zhu, Hao
Martin, Todd M. [2 ]
Ye, Lin
Sedykh, Alexander
Young, Douglas M. [2 ]
Tropsha, Alexander [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Sch Pharm, Div Med Chem & Nat Prod,Lab Mol Modeling, Carolina Environm Bioinformat Res Ctr, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] US EPA, Sustainable Technol Div, Natl Risk Management Res Lab, Off Res & Dev, Cincinnati, OH 45268 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
PREDICTIVE TOXICOLOGY; APPLICABILITY DOMAIN; QSAR; SELECTION;
D O I
10.1021/tx900189p
中图分类号
R914 [药物化学];
学科分类号
100701 ;
摘要
Few quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) Studies have successfully modeled large, diverse rodent toxicity end points. In this Study, a comprehensive data set of 7385 compounds with their most conservative lethal dose (LD50) Values has been compiled. A combinatorial QSAR approach has been employed to develop robust and predictive models of acute toxicity in rats caused by oral exposure to chemicals. To enable fair comparison between the predictive power of models generated in this study versus a commercial toxicity predictor, TOPKAT (Toxicity Prediction by Komputer Assisted Technology), a modeling subset of the entire data set was selected that included all 3472 compounds used in TOPKAT's training set. The remaining 3913 compounds, which were not present in the TOPKAT training set, were used as the external validation set. QSAR models of five different types were developed for the modeling set. The prediction accuracy for the external validation set was estimated by determination coefficient R-2 of linear regression between actual and predicted LD50 values. The use of the applicability domain threshold implemented in most models generally improved the external prediction accuracy but expectedly led to the decrease in chemical space coverage; depending on the applicability domain threshold, R-2 ranged from 0.24 to 0.70, Ultimately, several consensus models were developed by averaging the predicted LD50 for every compound using all live models. The consensus models afforded higher prediction accuracy for the external validation data set with the higher coverage as compared to individual constituent models. The validated consensus LD50 models developed in this study can be used as reliable computational predictors of in Vivo acute toxicity.
引用
收藏
页码:1913 / 1921
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship Modeling of the Amplex Ultrared Assay to Predict Thyroperoxidase Inhibitory Activity [J].
Gadaleta, Domenico ;
D'Alessandro, Luca ;
Marzo, Marco ;
Benfenati, Emilio ;
Roncaglioni, Alessandra .
FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2021, 12
[42]   In silico toxicity evaluation of dioxins using structure-activity relationship (SAR) and two-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship (2D-QSAR) [J].
Yang, Hong ;
Du, Zhe ;
Lv, Wen-Juan ;
Zhang, Xiao-Yun ;
Zhai, Hong-Lin .
ARCHIVES OF TOXICOLOGY, 2019, 93 (11) :3207-3218
[43]   Modeling Structure-Activity Relationship of AMPK Activation [J].
Drewe, Jurgen ;
Kuesters, Ernst ;
Hammann, Felix ;
Kreuter, Matthias ;
Boss, Philipp ;
Schoening, Verena .
MOLECULES, 2021, 26 (21)
[44]   Quantitative structure-activity relationship of sesquiterpene lactones with cytotoxic activity [J].
Scotti, Marcus T. ;
Fernandes, Mariane B. ;
Ferreira, Marcelo J. P. ;
Emerenciano, Vicente P. .
BIOORGANIC & MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2007, 15 (08) :2927-2934
[45]   Comparison of Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship Model Performances on Carboquinone Derivatives [J].
Bolboaca, Sorana D. ;
Jaentschi, Lorentz .
THESCIENTIFICWORLDJOURNAL, 2009, 9 :1148-1166
[46]   Conformal Regression for Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship Modeling-Quantifying Prediction Uncertainty [J].
Svensson, Fredrik ;
Aniceto, Natalia ;
Norinder, Ulf ;
Cortes-Ciriano, Isidro ;
Spjuth, Ola ;
Carlsson, Lars ;
Bender, Andreas .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING, 2018, 58 (05) :1132-1140
[47]   Advances in the molecular modeling and quantitative structure-activity relationship-based design for antihistamines [J].
Galvez, Jorge ;
Galvez-Llompart, Maria ;
Zanni, Riccardo ;
Garcia-Domenech, Ramon .
EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG DISCOVERY, 2013, 8 (03) :305-317
[48]   Multi-strategy enhanced snake optimizer for quantitative structure-activity relationship modeling [J].
Wang, Jiayin ;
Wang, Yukun .
APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, 2024, 132 :531-560
[49]   Acute toxicity of substituted phenols to Rana japonica tadpoles and mechanism-based quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) study [J].
Wang, XD ;
Dong, YY ;
Wang, LS ;
Han, SK .
CHEMOSPHERE, 2001, 44 (03) :447-455
[50]   Development of Predictive Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship Models of Epipodophyllotoxin Derivatives [J].
Naik, Pradeep Kumar ;
Dubey, Abhishek ;
Kumar, Rishay .
JOURNAL OF BIOMOLECULAR SCREENING, 2010, 15 (10) :1194-1203