Consensual Victim-Perpetrator Intercourse after Nonconsensual Sex: The Impact of Prior Relationship

被引:3
作者
Sawatsky, Megan L. [1 ,2 ]
Dawson, Samantha J. [1 ,3 ]
Lalumiere, Martin L. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lethbridge, Dept Psychol, Lethbridge, AB T1K 3M4, Canada
[2] Univ Ottawa, Sch Psychol, 136 Jean Jacques Lussier, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada
[3] Queens Univ, Dept Psychol, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
关键词
RAPE; EXPERIENCES; ASSAULT; WOMEN; VICTIMIZATION; RELIABILITY; AGGRESSION; RESPONSES; COERCION; SCOPE;
D O I
10.1080/00224499.2014.996279
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Some female victims of nonconsensual sex subsequently have consensual sexual intercourse with the perpetrator and are more likely to do so if intercourse occurred during the nonconsensual sex than if it did not. Some evolutionary psychologists have postulated that there is something significant about nonconsensual intercourse that causes women to subsequently have a sexual relationship with the perpetrator (e.g., risk of pregnancy). In this study, we investigated a parsimonious explanation that has previously been overlooked: Intercourse is more likely during nonconsensual sex when the victim and perpetrator have previously had a sexual relationship; thus, subsequent consensual intercourse may simply be a continuation of that prior relationship. A sample of 945 women completed an Internet-based survey, of whom 41% had experienced nonconsensual sex since age 14. As expected, victims who had intercourse with perpetrators prior to the nonconsensual sex event were significantly more likely than other victims to experience nonconsensual intercourse and to engage in subsequent consensual intercourse with the perpetrator. When considering only the small subsample of victims who never had a prior romantic or sexual relationship with the perpetrator, the odds of subsequent consensual intercourse were still significantly greater following nonconsensual sex with intercourse versus without intercourse.
引用
收藏
页码:194 / 203
页数:10
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
Altman D. G., 1990, Practical Statistics for medical research, DOI DOI 10.1201/9780429258589
[2]  
[Anonymous], OXFORD HDB EVOLUTION
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1998, ODDS RATIOS ANAL CON
[4]   A STUDY OF WOMEN WHO BOTH WERE RAPED AND AVOIDED RAPE [J].
BART, PB .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ISSUES, 1981, 37 (04) :123-137
[5]  
Basile Kathleen C, 2007, Violence Vict, V22, P437, DOI 10.1891/088667007781553955
[6]  
Black Michele C., 2011, The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS): 2010 Summary Report
[7]   Gender Differences in Cognitive and Affective Responses to Sexual Coercion [J].
Byers, E. Sandra ;
Glenn, Shannon A. .
JOURNAL OF INTERPERSONAL VIOLENCE, 2012, 27 (05) :827-845
[8]   Assessing the Propensity for Sexual Coaxing and Coercion in Relationships: Factor Structure, Reliability, and Validity of the Tactics to Obtain Sex Scale [J].
Camilleri, Joseph A. ;
Quinsey, Vernon L. ;
Tapscott, Jennifer L. .
ARCHIVES OF SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, 2009, 38 (06) :959-973
[9]  
Casey Erin A, 2006, Violence Vict, V21, P629, DOI 10.1891/vivi.21.5.629
[10]   Elevated sexual activity in violent marriages: Hypersexuality or sexual extortion? [J].
DeMaris, A .
JOURNAL OF SEX RESEARCH, 1997, 34 (04) :361-373