Effects of a Science of Learning Course on College Students' Learning With a Computer

被引:11
作者
Greene, Jeffrey A. [1 ]
Lobczowski, Nikki G. [2 ]
Freed, Rebekah [3 ]
Cartiff, Brian M. [3 ]
Demetriou, Cynthia [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Panter, A. T. [7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Univ North Carolina, Sch Educ, Educ Psychol & Learning Sci, 101A Peabody Hall,CB 3500, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] Univ North Carolina, 101A Peabody Hall,CB 3500, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[3] Univ North Carolina, Sch Educ, Learning Sci & Psychol Studies Program, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[4] Univ Arizona, Student Success & Retent Innovat, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
[5] Univ Arizona, Ctr Study Higher Educ, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
[6] Univ Arizona, Dept Educ Policy Studies, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
[7] Univ North Carolina, Coll Arts & Sci, Undergrad Educ, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[8] Univ North Carolina, LL Thurstone Psychometr Lab, Psychol & Neurosci, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
关键词
computers; first-generation college students; science of learning; self-regulated learning; THINK-ALOUD; SELF-REGULATION; STRATEGY USE; SKILLS; 1ST-GENERATION; INSTRUCTION; HYPERMEDIA; RETENTION; INTERVENTION; ENVIRONMENTS;
D O I
10.3102/0002831219865221
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
First-year courses have been used to bolster college student success, but empirical evidence on their efficacy is mixed. We investigated whether a first-year science of learning course, focused on self-regulated learning, would benefit first-generation college students. We randomly assigned students to a treatment condition involving enrollment in the course, a comparison condition in which students had access to online course materials only, or a control condition. From this larger study, we recruited 43 students to participate in a laboratory task involving learning about the circulatory system with a computer. We found that treatment and comparison students experienced greater changes in conceptual knowledge than the control group, and we found differences in the enactment of monitoring and strategy use across conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:947 / 978
页数:32
相关论文
共 110 条
[1]   Rethinking the Use of Tests: A Meta-Analysis of Practice Testing [J].
Adesope, Olusola O. ;
Trevisan, Dominic A. ;
Sundararajan, Narayankripa .
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 2017, 87 (03) :659-701
[2]   Calibration: What is it and why it matters? An introduction to the special issue on calibrating calibration [J].
Alexander, Patricia A. .
LEARNING AND INSTRUCTION, 2013, 24 :1-3
[3]  
Alexander PA, 2011, EDUC PSYCHOL HANDB, P393
[4]   Using hypermedia as a metacognitive tool for enhancing student learning? The role of self-regulated learning [J].
Azevedo, R .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGIST, 2005, 40 (04) :199-209
[5]  
Azevedo R., 2004, Journal of Educational Computing Research, V30, P87, DOI 10.2190/DVWX-GM1T-6THQ-5WC7
[6]   Does training on self-regulated learning facilitate students' learning with hypermedia? [J].
Azevedo, R ;
Cromley, JG .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 96 (03) :523-535
[7]  
AZEVEDO R, 2015, ANN M COGN SCI SOC P
[8]   Why is externally-facilitated regulated learning more effective than self-regulated learning with hypermedia? [J].
Azevedo, Roger ;
Moos, Daniel C. ;
Greene, Jeffrey A. ;
Winters, Fielding I. ;
Crornley, Jennifer G. .
ETR&D-EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2008, 56 (01) :45-72
[9]   Process mining techniques for analysing patterns and strategies in students' self-regulated learning [J].
Bannert, Maria ;
Reimann, Peter ;
Sonnenberg, Christoph .
METACOGNITION AND LEARNING, 2014, 9 (02) :161-185
[10]   Assessment of metacognitive skills by means of instruction to think aloud and reflect when prompted. Does the verbalisation method affect learning? [J].
Bannert, Maria ;
Mengelkamp, Christoph .
METACOGNITION AND LEARNING, 2008, 3 (01) :39-58