Screening for fetal growth restriction with universal third trimester ultrasonography in nulliparous women in the Pregnancy Outcome Prediction (POP) study: a prospective cohort study

被引:459
作者
Sovio, Ulla [1 ]
White, Ian R. [2 ]
Dacey, Alison [1 ]
Pasupathy, Dharmintra [3 ]
Smith, Gordon C. S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Natl Inst Hlth Res Cambridge, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Comprehens Biomed Res Ctr, Cambridge CB2 2SW, England
[2] Inst Publ Hlth, Med Res Council Biostat Unit, Cambridge, England
[3] Kings Coll London, Guys & St Thomas NHS Fdn Trust, Kings Hlth Partners, Div Womens Hlth,Womens Hlth Acad Ctr, London WC2R 2LS, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
PERINATAL DEATH; WEIGHT STANDARD; RISK; TERM;
D O I
10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00131-2
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Fetal growth restriction is a major determinant of adverse perinatal outcome. Screening procedures for fetal growth restriction need to identify small babies and then differentiate between those that are healthy and those that are pathologically small. We sought to determine the diagnostic effectiveness of universal ultrasonic fetal biometry in the third trimester as a screening test for small-for-gestational-age (SGA) infants, and whether the risk of morbidity associated with being small differed in the presence or absence of ultrasonic markers of fetal growth restriction. Methods The Pregnancy Outcome Prediction (POP) study was a prospective cohort study of nulliparous women with a viable singleton pregnancy at the time of the dating ultrasound scan. Women participating had clinically indicated ultrasonography in the third trimester as per routine clinical care and these results were reported as usual (selective ultrasonography). Additionally, all participants had research ultrasonography, including fetal biometry at 28 and 36 weeks' gestational age. These results were not made available to participants or treating clinicians (universal ultrasonography). We regarded SGA as a birthweight of less than the 10th percentile for gestational age and screen positive for SGA an ultrasonographic estimated fetal weight of less than the 10th percentile for gestational age. Markers of fetal growth restriction included biometric ratios, utero-placental Doppler, and fetal growth velocity. We assessed outcomes for consenting participants who attended research scans and had a livebirth at the Rosie Hospital (Cambridge, UK) after the 28 weeks' research scan. Findings Between Jan 14, 2008, and July 31, 2012, 4512 women provided written informed consent of whom 3977 (88%) were eligible for analysis. Sensitivity for detection of SGA infants was 20% (95% CI 15-24; 69 of 352 fetuses) for selective ultrasonography and 57% (51-62; 199 of 352 fetuses) for universal ultrasonography (relative sensitivity 2.9, 95% CI 2.4-3.5, p<0.0001). Of the 3977 fetuses, 562 (14.1%) were identified by universal ultrasonography with an estimated fetal weight of less than the 10th percentile and were at an increased risk of neonatal morbidity (relative risk [RR] 1.60, 95% CI 1.22-2.09, p=0.0012). However, estimated fetal weight of less than the 10th percentile was only associated with the risk of neonatal morbidity (p(interaction)=0.005) if the fetal abdominal circumference growth velocity was in the lowest decile (RR 3.9, 95% CI 1.9-8.1, p=0.0001). 172 (4%) of 3977 pregnancies had both an estimated fetal weight of less than the 10th percentile and abdominal circumference growth velocity in the lowest decile, and had a relative risk of delivering an SGA infant with neonatal morbidity of 17.6 (9.2-34.0, p<0.0001). Interpretation Screening of nulliparous women with universal third trimester fetal biometry roughly tripled detection of SGA infants. Combined analysis of fetal biometry and fetal growth velocity identified a subset of SGA fetuses that were at increased risk of neonatal morbidity. Copyright (C) Sovio et al. Open Access article distributed under the terms of CC BY.
引用
收藏
页码:2089 / 2097
页数:9
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
ACOG Committee on Obstetric Practice, 2006, Obstet Gynecol, V108, P1319
[2]  
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 2009, Obstet Gynecol, V113, P451, DOI 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31819930b0
[3]  
[Anonymous], GUID DEV METH INF NA
[4]   Effectiveness of detection of intrauterine growth retardation by abdominal palpation as screening test in a low risk population: an observational study [J].
Bais, JMJ ;
Eskes, M ;
Pel, M ;
Bonsel, GJ ;
Bleker, OP .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2004, 116 (02) :164-169
[5]   Adult consequences of fetal growth restriction [J].
Barker, David J. P. .
CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 49 (02) :270-283
[6]   ISUOG Practice Guidelines: use of Doppler ultrasonography in obstetrics [J].
Bhide, A. ;
Acharya, G. ;
Bilardo, C. M. ;
Brezinka, C. ;
Cafici, D. ;
Hernandez-Andrade, E. ;
Kalache, K. ;
Kingdom, J. ;
Kiserud, T. ;
Lee, W. ;
Lees, C. ;
Leung, K. Y. ;
Malinger, G. ;
Mari, G. ;
Prefumo, F. ;
Sepulveda, W. ;
Trudinger, B. .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 41 (02) :234-240
[7]   Routine ultrasound in late pregnancy (after 24 weeks' gestation) [J].
Bricker, Leanne ;
Neilson, James P. ;
Dowswell, Therese .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2008, (04)
[8]   Impairment of fetal growth potential and neonatal encephalopathy [J].
Bukowski, R ;
Burgett, AD ;
Gei, A ;
Saade, GR ;
Hankins, GDV .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 188 (04) :1011-1015
[9]   Screening for Intrauterine Growth Restriction in Uncomplicated Pregnancies: Time for Action [J].
Chauhan, Suneet P. ;
Rouse, Dwight J. ;
Ananth, Cande V. ;
Magann, Everett F. ;
Chang, Eugene ;
Dahlke, Joshua D. ;
Abuhamad, Alfred Z. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2013, 30 (01) :33-39
[10]  
De Reu PAOM, 2010, J PERINAT MED, V38, P311, DOI [10.1515/JPM.2010.027, 10.1515/jpm.2010.027]