Development of a generic thresholding algorithm for the delineation of 18FDG-PET-positive tissue: application to the comparison of three thresholding models

被引:72
作者
Vauclin, S. [1 ,2 ]
Doyeux, K. [1 ,2 ]
Hapdey, S. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Edet-Sanson, A. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Vera, P. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Gardin, I. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rouen, QUANT IF, LITIS Lab, EA 4108, Rouen, France
[2] Siemens Med Solut, Bobigny, France
[3] Ctr Henri Becquerel, Dept Nucl Med, F-76038 Rouen, France
[4] Rouen Univ Hosp, Rouen, France
关键词
POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; CELL LUNG-CANCER; FDG-PET; TUMOR VOLUMES; SEGMENTATION; TARGET; RADIOTHERAPY; IMPACT; DEFINITION; CARCINOMA;
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/54/22/010
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
An iterative generic algorithm has been developed to compare three thresholding models used to delineate gross tumour volume on F-18-FDG PET images. 3D volume was extracted and characteristic parameters were measured. Three fitting models using different parameters were studied: model 1 (volume, contrast), model 2 (contrast) and model 3 (SUV). The calibration was performed using a cylindrical phantom filled with hot spheres. To validate the models, two other phantoms were used. The calibration procedure showed a better fitting model for model 1 (R-2 from 0.94 to 1.00) than for model 3 (0.95) and model 2 (0.69). The validation study shows that model 3 yielded large volume measurement errors. Models 1 and 2 gave close results with no significant differences. Model 2 was preferred because it presents less error dispersion and needs fewer characteristic parameters, making it easier to implement. Our results show the importance of developing a generic algorithm to compare the performances of fitting models objectively and to validate results on other phantoms than the ones used during the calibration process to avoid methodological biases.
引用
收藏
页码:6901 / 6916
页数:16
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] A Gaussian mixture model for definition of lung tumor volumes in positron emission tomography
    Aristophanous, Michalis
    Penney, Bill C.
    Martel, Mary K.
    Pelizzari, Charles A.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2007, 34 (11) : 4223 - 4235
  • [2] Defining a radiotherapy target with positron emission tomography
    Black, QC
    Grills, IS
    Kestin, LL
    Wong, CYO
    Wong, JW
    Martinez, AA
    Yan, D
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2004, 60 (04): : 1272 - 1282
  • [3] Impact of FDG-PET on radiation therapy volume delineation in non-small-cell lung cancer
    Bradley, J
    Thorstad, WL
    Mutic, S
    Miller, TR
    Dehdashti, F
    Siegel, BA
    Bosch, W
    Bertrand, RJ
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2004, 59 (01): : 78 - 86
  • [4] Observer variation in contouring gross tumor volume in patients with poorly defined non-small-cell lung tumors on CT:: The impact of 18FDG-hybrid PET fusion
    Caldwell, CB
    Mah, K
    Ung, YC
    Danjoux, CE
    Balogh, JM
    Ganguli, SN
    Ehrlich, LE
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2001, 51 (04): : 923 - 931
  • [5] Tri-dimensional automatic segmentation of PET volumes based on measured source-to-background ratios:: influence of reconstruction algorithms
    Daisne, JF
    Sibomana, M
    Bol, A
    Doumont, T
    Lonneux, M
    Grégoire, V
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2003, 69 (03) : 247 - 250
  • [6] Iterative threshold segmentation for PET target volume delineation
    Drever, Laura
    Roa, Wilson
    McEwan, Alexander
    Robinson, Don
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2007, 34 (04) : 1253 - 1265
  • [7] Metastases from non-small cell lung cancer: Mediastinal staging in the 1990s - Meta-analytic comparison of PET and CT
    Dwamena, BA
    Sonnad, SS
    Angobaldo, JO
    Wahl, RL
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1999, 213 (02) : 530 - 536
  • [8] Erdi YE, 1997, CANCER, V80, P2505, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19971215)80:12+<2505::AID-CNCR24>3.3.CO
  • [9] 2-B
  • [10] Gambhir SS, 2001, J NUCL MED, V42, p1S