Stomatal behavior of ozone-sensitive and -insensitive coneflowers (Rudbeckia laciniata var. digitata) in Great Smoky Mountains National Park

被引:37
作者
Grulke, N. E. [1 ]
Neufeld, H. S.
Davison, A. W.
Roberts, M.
Chappelka, A. H.
机构
[1] USDA, US Forest Serv, Pacific SW Res Stn, Riverside, CA USA
[2] Appalachian State Univ, Dept Biol, Boone, NC USA
[3] Newcastle Univ, Sch Biol, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, Tyne & Wear, England
[4] Auburn Univ, Sch Forestry & Wildlife Sci, Auburn, AL 36849 USA
关键词
dynamic stomatal response; Great Smoky Mountains; ozone exposure; Rudbeckia laciniata; stomatal conductance; sunfleck; vapor pressure deficit;
D O I
10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01872.x
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Morphological and physiological attributes were assessed to elucidate the underlying mechanisms of ozone (O-3) sensitivity in a highly sensitive species, cutleaf coneflower (Rudbeckia laciniata var. digitata). Foliage at the same height in the canopy on paired O-3-sensitive and -insensitive cutleaf coneflowers was assessed for level of foliar symptoms, stomatal density, stomatal responsiveness to dynamic changes in light and leaf-to-air vapor pressure deficit (VPD), steady-state responses to light and CO2, intrinsic transpirational efficiency, and plant water balance. There were no morphological differences between the sensitivity types that might have contributed to greater O-3 uptake in sensitive individuals. Stomata of sensitive plants were less responsive than those of insensitive plants to experimentally increased and decreased light intensities, and to increased VPD. O-3-insensitive plants had greater intrinsic transpirational efficiencies, greater maximum assimilation rates under saturating CO2 and light, and greater carboxylation rates. Different physiological attributes vary independently within an individual plant, which collectively confer sensitivity or insensitivity to O-3 injury.
引用
收藏
页码:100 / 109
页数:10
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]   Diversity of an early successional plant community as influenced by ozone [J].
Barbo, DN ;
Chappelka, AH ;
Somers, GL ;
Miller-Goodman, MS ;
Stolte, K .
NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 1998, 138 (04) :653-662
[2]   Intra-specific variability of ozone sensitivity in Centaurea jacea L., a potential bioindicator for elevated ozone concentrations [J].
Bassin, S ;
Kölliker, R ;
Cretton, C ;
Bertossa, M ;
Widmer, F ;
Bungener, P ;
Fuhrer, E .
ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2004, 131 (01) :1-12
[3]   Seasonal profiles of leaf ascorbic acid content and redox state in ozone-sensitive wildflowers [J].
Burkey, Kent O. ;
Neufeld, Howard S. ;
Souza, Lara ;
Chappelka, Arthur H. ;
Davison, Alan W. .
ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2006, 143 (03) :427-434
[4]   CA-2+ TRANSPORT IN MEMBRANE-VESICLES FROM PINTO BEAN-LEAVES AND ITS ALTERATION AFTER OZONE EXPOSURE [J].
CASTILLO, FJ ;
HEATH, RL .
PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1990, 94 (02) :788-795
[5]   Visible ozone injury on forest trees in Great Smoky Mountains National Park, USA [J].
Chappelka, A ;
Somers, G ;
Renfro, J .
WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION, 1999, 116 (1-2) :255-260
[6]   Mature black cherry used as a bioindicator of ozone injury [J].
Chappelka, A ;
Skelly, J ;
Somers, G ;
Renfro, J ;
Hildebrand, E .
WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION, 1999, 116 (1-2) :261-266
[7]   Evaluation of ozone injury on foliage of black cherry (Prunus serotina) and tall milkweed (Asclepias exaltata) in Great Smoky Mountains National Park [J].
Chappelka, A ;
Renfro, J ;
Somers, G ;
Nash, B .
ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 1997, 95 (01) :13-18
[8]   Ozone injury on cutleaf coneflower (Rudbeckia laciniata) and crown-beard (Verbesina occidentalis) in Great Smoky Mountains National Park [J].
Chappelka, AH ;
Neufeld, HS ;
Davison, AW ;
Somers, GL ;
Renfro, JR .
ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2003, 125 (01) :53-59
[9]   Reproductive development of blackberry (Rubus cuneifolius), as influenced by ozone [J].
Chappelka, AH .
NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 2002, 155 (02) :249-255
[10]   DECLINE OF ACTIVITY AND QUANTITY OF RIBULOSE BISPHOSPHATE CARBOXYLASE OXYGENASE AND NET PHOTOSYNTHESIS IN OZONE-TREATED POTATO FOLIAGE [J].
DANN, MS ;
PELL, EJ .
PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1989, 91 (01) :427-432