Number of prenatal visits and pregnancy outcomes in low-risk women

被引:73
作者
Carter, E. B. [1 ]
Tuuli, M. G. [1 ]
Caughey, A. B. [2 ]
Odibo, A. O. [3 ]
Macones, G. A. [1 ]
Cahill, A. G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med, 660 South Euclid Ave,Matern Bldg,5th Floor, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[2] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Portland, OR 97201 USA
[3] Univ S Florida, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Tampa, FL 33620 USA
关键词
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; CARE UTILIZATION INDEX; PERINATAL OUTCOMES; UNITED-STATES; ADEQUACY; FUTURE;
D O I
10.1038/jp.2015.183
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: We investigated the association between number of prenatal visits (PNV) and pregnancy outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort of 12 092 consecutive, uncomplicated term births was included. Exclusion criteria included unknown or third trimester pregnancy dating, pre-existing medical conditions and common pregnancy complications. Patients with <= 10 PNV were compared with those with >10. The primary outcome was a neonatal composite including neonatal intensive care unit admission, low APGAR score (< 7), low umbilical cord pH (< 7.10) and neonatal demise. Secondary outcomes included components of the composite as well as vaginal delivery, induction and cesarean delivery. Logistic regression was used to adjust for potential confounders. RESULT: Of 7256 patients in the cohort meeting inclusion criteria, 30% (N=2163) had >10 PNV and the remaining 70% (N=5093) had <= 10, respectively. There was no difference in the neonatal composite between the two groups. However, women with >10 PNV were more likely to undergo induction of labor and cesarean delivery. CONCLUSION: Low-risk women with >= 10 PNV had higher rates of pregnancy interventions without improvement in neonatal outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:178 / 181
页数:4
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
Alexander GR, 2001, PUBLIC HEALTH REP, V116, P306
[2]  
American Academy of Pediatrics ACoO Gynecologists, 2012, GUID PER CAR
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2009, OBSTET GYNECOL, DOI DOI 10.1097/AOG.0B013E31819930B0
[4]   A COMPARISON OF PRENATAL-CARE USE IN THE UNITED-STATES AND EUROPE [J].
BUEKENS, P ;
KOTELCHUCK, M ;
BLONDEL, B ;
KRISTENSEN, FB ;
CHEN, JH ;
MASUYSTROOBANT, G .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1993, 83 (01) :31-36
[5]   Alternative versus standard packages of antenatal care for low-risk pregnancy [J].
Dowswell, Therese ;
Carroli, Guillermo ;
Duley, Lelia ;
Gates, Simon ;
Gulmezoglu, A. Metin ;
Khan-Neelofur, Dina ;
Piaggio, Gilda G. P. .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2010, (10)
[6]   THE EFFECT OF HEALTH COVERAGE FOR UNINSURED PREGNANT-WOMEN ON MATERNAL HEALTH AND THE USE OF CESAREAN-SECTION [J].
HAAS, JS ;
UDVARHELYI, S ;
EPSTEIN, AM .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1993, 270 (01) :61-64
[7]   Effectiveness of group medical visits for improving diabetes care: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Housden, Laura ;
Wong, Sabrina T. ;
Dawes, Martin .
CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2013, 185 (13) :E635-E644
[8]   Group prenatal care and perinatal outcomes - A randomized controlled trial [J].
Ickovics, Jeannette R. ;
Kershaw, Trace S. ;
Westdahl, Claire ;
Magriples, Urania ;
Massey, Zohar ;
Reynolds, Heather ;
Rising, Sharon Schindler .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 110 (02) :330-339
[9]   The changing pattern of prenatal care utilization in the United States, 1981-1995, using different prenatal care indices [J].
Kogan, MD ;
Martin, JA ;
Alexander, GR ;
Kotelchuck, M ;
Ventura, SJ ;
Frigoletto, FD .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 279 (20) :1623-1628
[10]   THE ADEQUACY OF PRENATAL-CARE UTILIZATION INDEX - ITS US DISTRIBUTION AND ASSOCIATION WITH LOW-BIRTH-WEIGHT [J].
KOTELCHUCK, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1994, 84 (09) :1486-1489