Cost-effectiveness of buffered soluble alendronate 70 mg effervescent tablet for the treatment of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis in Italy

被引:7
作者
Hiligsmann, M. [1 ]
Maggi, S. [2 ]
Veronese, N. [3 ]
Sartori, L. [4 ]
Reginster, J. -Y. [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ, CAPHRI Care & Publ Hlth Res Inst, Dept Hlth Serv Res, POB 616, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] CNR NI, Aging Branch Padua, Padua, Italy
[3] Univ Palermo, Dept Geriatr, Palermo, Italy
[4] Univ Padua, Dept Med, Padua, Italy
[5] Univ Liege, Dept Publ Hlth Epidemiol & Hlth Econ, Liege, Belgium
[6] King Saud Univ, Biochem Dept, Coll Sci, Chair Biomarkers Chron Dis, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
关键词
Alendronate; Buffered soluble alendronate; Cost-effectiveness; Economic evaluation; Effervescent tablets; Osteoporosis; Treatment;
D O I
10.1007/s00198-020-05802-5
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The use of buffered soluble alendronate 70 mg effervescent tablet, a convenient dosing regimen for bisphosphonate therapy, seems a cost-effective strategy compared with relevant alternative treatments for postmenopausal women with osteoporosis aged 60 years and over in Italy. Introduction To assess the cost-effectiveness of buffered soluble alendronate (ALN) 70 mg effervescent tablet compared with relevant alternative treatments for postmenopausal osteoporotic women in Italy. Methods A previously validated Markov microsimulation model was adjusted to the Italian healthcare setting to estimate the lifetime costs (expressed in euro2019) per quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) of buffered soluble ALN compared with generic ALN, denosumab, zoledronic acid and no treatment. Pooled efficacy data derived from the NICE network meta-analysis were used for bisphosphonate treatments. Two treatment duration scenarios were assessed: 1 year using persistence data derived from an Italian prospective observational study including 144 and 216 postmenopausal osteoporotic women on buffered soluble ALN and oral ALN, respectively, and 3 years. Analyses were conducted for women 60-80 years of age with a bone mineral density T-score <= - 3.0 or with existing vertebral fractures. Results In all simulated populations, buffered soluble ALN was dominant (more QALYs, lower costs) compared to denosumab. The cost per QALY gained of buffered soluble ALN compared to generic ALN and no treatment always falls below euro20,000 per QALY gained. In the 1-year treatment scenario, zoledronic acid was associated with more QALY than buffered soluble ALN but the cost per QALY gained of zoledronic acid compared with buffered soluble ALN was always higher than euro70,000, while buffered soluble ALN was dominant in the 3-year treatment scenario. Conclusion This study suggests that buffered soluble ALN represents a cost-effective strategy compared with relevant alternative treatments for postmenopausal osteoporosis women in Italy aged 60 years and over.
引用
收藏
页码:595 / 606
页数:12
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
Black, AGING CLIN EXP RES
[2]   Fracture risk reduction with alendronate in women with osteoporosis: The Fracture Intervention Trial [J].
Black, DM ;
Thompson, DE ;
Bauer, DC ;
Ensrud, K ;
Musliner, T ;
Hochberg, MC ;
Nevitt, MC ;
Suryawanshi, S ;
Cummings, SR .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2000, 85 (11) :4118-4124
[3]  
BLACK DM, 2007, NEW ENGL J MED, V356, P1809, DOI DOI 10.1056/NEJMOA067312
[4]   Treatment with Denosumab Reduces the Incidence of New Vertebral and Hip Fractures in Postmenopausal Women at High Risk [J].
Boonen, S. ;
Adachi, J. D. ;
Man, Z. ;
Cummings, S. R. ;
Lippuner, K. ;
Torring, O. ;
Gallagher, J. C. ;
Farrerons, J. ;
Wang, A. ;
Franchimont, N. ;
San Martin, J. ;
Grauer, A. ;
McClung, M. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2011, 96 (06) :1727-1736
[5]   At what hip fracture risk is it cost-effective to treat?: International intervention thresholds for the treatment of osteoporosis [J].
Borgstroem, F. ;
Johnell, O. ;
Kanis, J. A. ;
Joensson, B. ;
Rehnberg, C. .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2006, 17 (10) :1459-1471
[6]   Fragility fractures in Europe: burden, management and opportunities [J].
Borgstrom, Fredrik ;
Karlsson, Linda ;
Ortsater, Gustav ;
Norton, Nicolas ;
Halbout, Philippe ;
Cooper, Cyrus ;
Lorentzon, Mattias ;
McCloskey, Eugene, V ;
Harvey, Nicholas C. ;
Javaid, Muhamamd K. ;
Kanis, John A. .
ARCHIVES OF OSTEOPOROSIS, 2020, 15 (01)
[7]   Treatment Sequence Matters: Anabolic and Antiresorptive Therapy for Osteoporosis [J].
Cosman, Felicia ;
Nieves, Jeri W. ;
Dempster, David W. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 2017, 32 (02) :198-202
[8]   Denosumab for Prevention of Fractures in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis [J].
Cummings, Steven R. ;
San Martin, Javier ;
McClung, Michael R. ;
Siris, Ethel S. ;
Eastell, Richard ;
Reid, Ian R. ;
Delmas, Pierre ;
Zoog, Holly B. ;
Austin, Matt ;
Wang, Andrea ;
Kutilek, Stepan ;
Adami, Silvano ;
Zanchetta, Jose ;
Libanati, Cesar ;
Siddhanti, Suresh ;
Christiansen, Claus .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2009, 361 (08) :756-765
[9]  
Fardellone P, 2019, OSTEOPOROSIS INT, V30, pS483
[10]   Real-world persistence and adherence with oral bisphosphonates for osteoporosis: a systematic review [J].
Fatoye, F. ;
Smith, P. ;
Gebrye, T. ;
Yeowell, G. .
BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (04)