COVID-19 epidemic prediction and the impact of public health interventions: A review of COVID-19 epidemic models

被引:94
作者
Xiang, Yue [1 ,2 ]
Jia, Yonghong [3 ]
Chen, Linlin [1 ]
Guo, Lei [1 ]
Shu, Bizhen [4 ]
Long, Enshen [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, Inst Disaster Management & Reconstruct, MOE Key Lab Deep Earth Sci & Engn, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[2] Chongqing Univ Sci & Technol, Chongqing Safety Engn Inst, Chongqing, Peoples R China
[3] Sichuan Univ, Coll Architecture & Environm, Room 112,Adm Bldg,24 First Loop South First Sect, Chengdu 610065, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[4] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp 2, Key Lab Birth Defects & Related Dis Women & Child, Chengdu, Peoples R China
基金
国家重点研发计划; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
COVID-19; Epidemic model; Public health intervention; Compartmental model; Reproduction number; ACUTE RESPIRATORY SYNDROME; TRANSMISSION; CHINA;
D O I
10.1016/j.idm.2021.01.001
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The coronavirus disease outbreak of 2019 (COVID-19) has been spreading rapidly to all corners of the word, in a very complex manner. A key research focus is in predicting the development trend of COVID-19 scientifically through mathematical modelling. We conducted a systematic review of epidemic prediction models of COVID-19 and the public health intervention strategies by searching the Web of Science database. 55 studies of the COVID-19 epidemic model were reviewed systematically. It was found that the COVID-19 epidemic models were different in the model type, acquisition method, hypothesis and distribution of key input parameters. Most studies used the gamma distribution to describe the key time period of COVID-19 infection, and some studies used the lognormal distribution, the Erlang distribution, and theWeibull distribution. The setting ranges of the incubation period, serial interval, infectious period and generation time were 4.9-7 days, 4.41-8.4 days, 2.3-10 days and 4.4-7.5 days, respectively, and more than half of the incubation periods were set to 5.1 or 5.2 days. Most models assumed that the latent period was consistent with the incubation period. Some models assumed that asymptomatic infections were infectious or pre-symptomatic transmission was possible, which overestimated the value of R-0. For the prediction differences under different public health strategies, the most significant effect was in travel restrictions. There were different studies on the impact of contact tracking and social isolation, but it was considered that improving the quarantine rate and reporting rate, and the use of protective face mask were essential for epidemic prevention and control. The input epidemiological parameters of the prediction models had significant differences in the prediction of the severity of the epidemic spread. Therefore, prevention and control institutions should be cautious when formulating public health strategies by based on the prediction results of mathematical models. (c) 2021 The Authors. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of KeAi Communications Co., Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:324 / 342
页数:19
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]   Modeling behavioral change and COVID-19 containment in Mexico: A trade-off between lockdown and compliance [J].
Adrian Acuna-Zegarra, Manuel ;
Santana-Cibrian, Mario ;
Velasco-Hernandez, Jorge X. .
MATHEMATICAL BIOSCIENCES, 2020, 325
[2]   Data-based analysis, modelling and forecasting of the COVID-19 outbreak [J].
Anastassopoulou, Cleo ;
Russo, Lucia ;
Tsakris, Athanasios ;
Siettos, Constantinos .
PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (03)
[3]  
ANDERSON R M, 1991
[4]   How will country-based mitigation measures influence the course of the COVID-19 epidemic? [J].
Anderson, Roy M. ;
Heesterbeek, Hans ;
Klinkenberg, Don ;
Hollingsworth, T. Deirdre .
LANCET, 2020, 395 (10228) :931-934
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2020, INFECT DIS MODEL, DOI DOI 10.1016/j.idm.2020.04.001
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2020, ECB communication to reporting agents on the collection of statistical information in the context of COVID-19
[7]   Risk Assessment of Novel Coronavirus COVID-19 Outbreaks Outside China [J].
Boldog, Peter ;
Tekeli, Tamas ;
Vizi, Zsolt ;
Denes, Attila ;
Bartha, Ferenc A. ;
Rost, Gergely .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2020, 9 (02)
[8]  
Centers For Disease Control And Prevention/National Center For Health Statistics, 2020, Risk for COVID-19 infection, hospitalization, and death by race/ethnicity, DOI DOI 10.1891/9780826153425.0016B
[9]  
Chen XG, 2020, GLOB HEALTH RES POL, V5, DOI [10.1186/s41256-020-00142-7, 10.1186/s41256-020-00137-4]
[10]  
China H. P. P. s. G. o, 2020, RESULT WUHANS CENTRA