Validation of the Partin Nomogram for Prostate Cancer in a National Sample

被引:49
|
作者
Yu, James B. [1 ]
Makarov, Danil V. [3 ,5 ]
Sharma, Richa [4 ]
Peschel, Richard E. [1 ]
Partin, Alan W. [6 ]
Gross, Cary P. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Therapeut Radiol, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[2] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Internal Med, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[3] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Robert Wood Johnson Clin Scholars Program, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[4] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Sch Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[5] Vet Affairs Connecticut Healthcare Syst, West Haven, CT USA
[6] Johns Hopkins Med Inst, James Buchanan Brady Urol Inst, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
关键词
prostate; prostatic neoplasms; neoplasm staging; nomograms; SEER program; PREDICT PATHOLOGICAL STAGE; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; CLINICAL STAGE; GLEASON SCORE; EXTERNAL VALIDATION; RADIATION-THERAPY; TABLES; ANTIGEN; MEN; ADENOCARCINOMA;
D O I
10.1016/j.juro.2009.08.143
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: The Partin tables are a nomogram that is widely used to discriminate prostate cancer pathological stages, given common preoperative clinical characteristics. The nomogram is based on patients undergoing radical prostatectomy at The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions. We validated the Partin tables in a large, population based sample. Materials and Methods: The National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database was used to identify patients treated from 2004 to 2005 who underwent radical prostatectomy. The 2007 Partin tables were used to estimate the prevalence of positive lymph nodes, seminal vesicle invasion, extraprostatic extension and organ confined disease in men with prostate cancer in the database using clinical stage, preoperative prostate specific antigen and Gleason score. The discriminative ability of the tables was explored by constructing ROC curves. Results: We identified 11,185 men who underwent radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer in 2004 to 2005. The Partin tables discriminated well between patient groups at risk for positive lymph nodes and seminal vesicle invasion (AUC 0.77 and 0.74, respectively). The discrimination of extraprostatic extension and organ confined disease was more limited (AUC 0.62 and 0.68, respectively). The AUC for positive lymph nodes was 0.78 in white men, 0.73 in black men and 0.83 in Asian/Pacific Islander men (p = 0.17). The AUC for positive lymph nodes in men 61 years old or younger was 0.80 vs 0.74 in men older than 61 years (p 0.03). Conclusions: The Partin tables showed excellent discrimination for seminal vesicle invasion and positive lymph nodes. Discrimination of extraprostatic extension and organ confined disease was more limited. The Partin tables performed best in young men.
引用
收藏
页码:105 / 111
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [2] An updated prostate cancer staging nomogram (Partin tables) based on cases from 2006 to 2011
    Eifler, John B.
    Feng, Zhaoyang
    Lin, Brian M.
    Partin, Michael T.
    Humphreys, Elizabeth B.
    Han, Misop
    Epstein, Jonathan I.
    Walsh, Patrick C.
    Trock, Bruce J.
    Partin, Alan W.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 111 (01) : 22 - 29
  • [3] External Validation of the 2007 and 2001 Partin Tables in Irish Prostate Cancer Patients
    Fanning, D. M.
    Fan, Y.
    Fitzpatrick, J. M.
    Watson, R. W. G.
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2010, 84 (02) : 174 - 179
  • [4] Population-Based External Validation of the Updated 2012 Partin Tables in Contemporary North American Prostate Cancer Patients
    Leyh-Bannurah, Sami-Ramzi
    Gazdovich, Stephanie
    Budaeus, Lars
    Zaffuto, Emanuele
    Dell'Oglio, Paolo
    Briganti, Alberto
    Abdollah, Firas
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Schiffmann, Jonas
    Menon, Mani
    Shariat, Shahrokh F.
    Fisch, Margit
    Chun, Felix
    Graefen, Markus
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    PROSTATE, 2017, 77 (01) : 105 - 113
  • [5] Implementing the use of nomograms by choosing threshold points in predictive models: 2012 updated Partin Tables vs a European predictive nomogram for organ-confined disease in prostate cancer
    Borque, Angel
    Rubio-Briones, Jose
    Esteban, Luis M.
    Sanz, Gerardo
    Dominguez-Escrig, Jose
    Ramirez-Backhaus, Miguel
    Calatrava, Ana
    Solsona, Eduardo
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 113 (06) : 878 - 886
  • [6] Independent external validation of nomogram to predict extracapsular extension in patients with prostate cancer
    Alves, Joao Ricardo
    Muglia, Valdair F.
    Lucchesi, Fabiano R.
    Faria, Raisa A. O. G.
    Alcantara-Quispe, Cinthia
    Vazquez, Vinicius L.
    Reis, Rodolfo B.
    Faria, Eliney F.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2020, 30 (09) : 5004 - 5010
  • [7] Reliability of the different versions of Partin tables in predicting extraprostatic extension of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Eissa, Ahmed
    Elsherbiny, Ahmed
    Zoeir, Ahmed
    Sandri, Marco
    Pirola, Giacomo
    Puliatti, Stefano
    Del Prete, Chiara
    Sighinolfi, Maria C.
    Micali, Salvatore
    Rocco, Bernardo
    Bianchi, Giampaolo
    MINERVA UROLOGICA E NEFROLOGICA, 2019, 71 (05) : 457 - 478
  • [8] Development and Internal Validation of a Prostate Health Index Based Nomogram for Predicting Prostate Cancer at Extended Biopsy
    Lughezzani, Giovanni
    Lazzeri, Massimo
    Larcher, Alessandro
    Lista, Giuliana
    Scattoni, Vincenzo
    Cestari, Andrea
    Buffi, Nicolo Maria
    Bini, Vittorio
    Guazzoni, Giorgio
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 188 (04) : 1144 - 1150
  • [9] Are Partin tables suitable for Chinese patients with prostate cancer?
    Shen Xiao-cao
    Qiu Yi-qing
    Zheng Yi-chun
    Zhang Su-zhan
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 125 (21) : 3795 - 3799
  • [10] Validation of partin tables and development of a preoperative nomogram for Japanese patients with clinically localized prostate cancer using 2005 international society of urological pathology consensus on gleason grading: Data from the clinicopathological research group for localized prostate cancer
    Naito, Seiji
    Kuroiwa, Kentaro
    Kinukawa, Naoko
    Goto, Ken
    Koga, Hirofumi
    Ogawa, Osamu
    Murai, Masaru
    Shiraishi, Taizo
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 180 (03) : 904 - 909