The diagnostic value of intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging for distinguishing nonhypervascular pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas

被引:6
作者
Zeng, Piaoe [1 ]
Ma, Lu [2 ]
Liu, Jianfang [1 ]
Song, Zixiu [3 ]
Liu, Jianyu [1 ]
Yuan, Huishu [1 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ Third Hosp, Dept Radiol, 49 North Garden Rd, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
[2] Tsinghua Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, 30 Shuangqing Rd, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[3] Peking Univ Third Hosp, Dept Pathol, 49 North Garden Rd, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
关键词
Neuroendocrine tumors; Pancreatic neoplasms; Magnetic resonance imaging; Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging; HISTOGRAM ANALYSIS; DIFFERENTIATION; PERFUSION; COEFFICIENT; PARAMETERS; MIMICS; MDCT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110261
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To primarily evaluate the diagnostic performance of the monoexponential and intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) models for differentiating between nonhypervascular pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs). Methods: 63 patients with PNETs (35 nonhypervascular PNETs and 28 hypervascular PNETs) and 164 patients with PDACs were retrospectively enrolled in the study and underwent multiple b-value DWI. Intraobserver and interobserver reliabilities of DWI parameters were assessed by using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The parameters of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), true diffusion coefficient (D), pseudo-diffusion coefficient (D*), and perfusion fraction (f) of nonhypervascular PNETs were compared with PDACs and hypervascular PNETs using the independent sample t test or the Mann-Whitney U test. The diagnostic performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Results: All DWI parameters values showed good to excellent intra- and interobserver agreements (ICC = 0.743-0.873). Nonhypervascular PNETs had significantly lower ADC and D, but significantly higher f than PDACs (P = 0.005, P < 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively). ADC, D and f of nonhypervascular PNETs were lower than hypervascular PNETs (P = 0.001, <0.001 and 0.093, respectively). D* of nonhypervascular PNETs showed no statistically significant differences with PDACs and hypervascular PNETs (P = 0.809 and 0.420). D showed a higher area under the curve (AUC), followed by ADC and f (AUC = 0.885, 0.665 and 0.740, respectively) in differentiating nonhypervascular PNETs from PDACs. Conclusion: Monoexponential and IVIM diffusion models are valuable to differentiate nonhypervascular PNETs from PDACs. D showed better performance than f and ADC.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Measurement reproducibility of perfusion fraction and pseudodiffusion coefficient derived by intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MR imaging in normal liver and metastases
    Andreou, A.
    Koh, D. M.
    Collins, D. J.
    Blackledge, M.
    Wallace, T.
    Leach, M. O.
    Orton, M. R.
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2013, 23 (02) : 428 - 434
  • [2] Imaging presentation of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms
    Ciaravino, Valentina
    De Robertis, Riccardo
    Martini, Paolo Tinazzi
    Cardobi, Nicolo
    Cingarlini, Sara
    Amodio, Antonio
    Landoni, Luca
    Capelli, Paola
    D'Onofrio, Mirko
    [J]. INSIGHTS INTO IMAGING, 2018, 9 (06): : 943 - 953
  • [3] Pancreatic Imaging Mimics: Part 1, Imaging Mimics of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
    Coakley, Fergus V.
    Hanley-Knutson, Katryana
    Mongan, John
    Barajas, Ramon
    Bucknor, Matthew
    Qayyum, Aliya
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2012, 199 (02) : 301 - 308
  • [4] The Effect of Low b-Values on the Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Derived Pseudodiffusion Parameter in Liver
    Cohen, Alexander D.
    Schieke, Moira C.
    Hohenwalter, Mark D.
    Schmainda, Kathleen M.
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2015, 73 (01) : 306 - 311
  • [5] Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MR imaging of solid pancreatic masses: reliability and usefulness for characterization
    De Robertis, Riccardo
    Cardobi, Nicolo
    Ortolani, Silvia
    Martini, Paolo Tinazzi
    Stemmer, Alto
    Grimm, Robert
    Gobbo, Stefano
    Butturini, Giovanni
    D'Onofrio, Mirko
    [J]. ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2019, 44 (01) : 131 - 139
  • [6] ENETS Consensus Guidelines Update for the Management of Patients with Functional Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors and Non-Functional Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors
    Falconi, M.
    Eriksson, B.
    Kaltsas, G.
    Bartsch, D. K.
    Capdevila, J.
    Caplin, M.
    Kos-Kudla, B.
    Kwekkeboom, D.
    Rindi, G.
    Kloeppel, G.
    Reed, N.
    Kianmanesh, R.
    Jensen, R. T.
    [J]. NEUROENDOCRINOLOGY, 2016, 103 (02) : 153 - 171
  • [7] Imaging mimics of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
    Gandhi, Namita S.
    Feldman, Myra K.
    Le, Ott
    Morris-Stiff, Gareth
    [J]. ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2018, 43 (02) : 273 - 284
  • [8] Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Prediction of the Histologic Grade Using Pure Diffusion Coefficient and Tumor Size
    Hwang, Eui Jin
    Lee, Jeong Min
    Yoon, Jeong Hee
    Kim, Jung Hoon
    Han, Joon Koo
    Choi, Byung Ihn
    Lee, Kyoung-Bun
    Jang, Jin-Young
    Kim, Sun-Whe
    Nickel, Marcel Dominik
    Kiefer, Berthold
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2014, 49 (06) : 396 - 402
  • [9] Nonhypervascular Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Differential Diagnosis from Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinomas at MR Imaging-Retrospective Cross-sectional Study
    Jeon, Sun Kyung
    Lee, Jeong Min
    Joo, Ijin
    Lee, Eun Sun
    Park, Hyun Jeong
    Jang, Jin-Young
    Ryu, Ji Kon
    Lee, Kyung Bun
    Han, Joon Koo
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2017, 284 (01) : 77 - 87
  • [10] Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging for Characterization of Focal Pancreatic Lesions
    Kang, Koung Mi
    Lee, Jeong Min
    Yoon, Jeong Hee
    Kiefer, Berthold
    Han, Joon Koo
    Choi, Byung Ihn
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2014, 270 (02) : 444 - 453