Reliability and validity of a computerized neurocognitive test battery, CNS Vital Signs

被引:622
作者
Gualtieri, C. Thomas
Johnson, Lynda G.
机构
[1] N Carolina Neuropsychiat Clin, Dept Neuropsychiat, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[2] N Carolina Neuropsychiat Clin, Dept Neuropsychol, Chapel Hill, NC USA
关键词
test development; reliability; concurrent validity; normative data; computerized test; memory; psychomotor speed; reaction time; complex attention; cognitive flexibility; CNS Vital Signs;
D O I
10.1016/j.acn.2006.05.007
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
CNS Vital Signs (CNSVS) is a computerized neurocognitive test battery that was developed as a routine clinical screening instrument. It is comprised of seven tests: verbal and visual memory, finger tapping, symbol digit coding, the Stroop Test, a test of shifting attention and the continuous performance test. Because CNSVS is a battery of well-known neuropsychological tests, one should expect its psychometric properties to resemble those of the conventional tests upon which it is based. 1069 subjects age 7-90 participated in the normative database for CNSVS. Test-retest reliability (TRT) was evaluated in 99 Ss who took the battery on two separate occasions, separated, on the average, by 62 days; the results were comparable to those achieved by equivalent conventional and computerized tests. Concurrent validity studies in 180 subjects, normals and neuropsychiatric patients, indicate correlations that are comparable to the concurrent validity of similar tests. Discriminant validity is supported by studies of patients with mild cognitive impairment and dementia, post-concussion syndrome and severe traumatic brain injury, ADHD (treated and untreated) and depression (treated and untreated). The tests in CNSVS are also sensitive to malingerers and patients with conversion disorders. The psychometric characteristics of the tests in the CNSVS battery are very similar to the characteristics of the conventional neuropsychological tests upon which they are based. CNSVS is suitable for use as ascreening instrument, or as a serial assessment measure. But it is not a substitute for formal neuropsychological testing, it is not diagnostic, and it will have only a limited role in the medical setting, absent the active participation of consulting neuropsychologists. (c) 2006 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of National Academy of Neuropsychology.
引用
收藏
页码:623 / 643
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Preliminary Reliability Study of Computerized Neurobehavioural Test Method
    Shaari, Norlida
    Hariri, Azian
    Paiman, Nuur Azreen
    Nasir, Nurul Fitriah
    Nordin, Normayati
    Ainuddin, Ainun Rahmahwati
    Isa, Norasikin Mat
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTEGRATED ENGINEERING, 2018, 10 (05): : 99 - 108
  • [42] Reliability and validity of the maximal anaerobic running test
    Nummela, A
    Alberts, M
    Rijntjes, RP
    Luhtanen, P
    Rusko, H
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 1996, 17 : S97 - S102
  • [43] Reliability and Validity of the Revised Osteoporosis Knowledge Test
    Qi, Bing-Bing
    Resnick, Barbara
    Nahm, Eun-Shim
    JOURNAL OF NURSING MEASUREMENT, 2014, 22 (02) : 342 - 356
  • [44] Validity and reliability of the Functional Dexterity Test in children
    Tissue, Camden M.
    Velleman, Paul F.
    Stegink-Jansen, Caroline W.
    Aaron, Dorit Haenosh
    Winthrop, Barbara G.
    Gogola, Gloria R.
    JOURNAL OF HAND THERAPY, 2017, 30 (04) : 500 - 506
  • [45] The Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the AWESCORE Test
    Yildiz, Burak
    Kenis-Coskun, Ozge
    Kiziltepe, Tugce
    Karadag-Saygi, Evrim
    Ergenekon, Pinar
    Erdem-Eralp, Ela
    Gokdemir, Yasemin
    Karadag, Bulent
    TURKISH ARCHIVES OF PEDIATRICS, 2025, 60 (02):
  • [46] Reliability and Validity of a Computerized and Chinese Version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire
    Su, Wentao
    Xu, Xia
    ICAIE 2009: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2009 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND EDUCATION, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2009, : 768 - 771
  • [47] A Study on the Reliability and Validity of PETS Oral Test
    Zhang Ning
    Wang Chunjuan
    Wang Caixia
    2018 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ARTS, LINGUISTICS, LITERATURE AND HUMANITIES (ICALLH 2018), 2018, : 318 - 322
  • [48] Revision of the Osteoporosis Knowledge Test: Reliability and Validity
    Gendler, Phyllis Ellen
    Coviak, Cynthia Peltier
    Martin, Jean Thomas
    Kim, Katherine K.
    Dankers, Jennifer K.
    Barclay, Julieanne Marie
    Sanchez, Thomas A.
    WESTERN JOURNAL OF NURSING RESEARCH, 2015, 37 (12) : 1623 - 1643
  • [49] Reliability and validity of the Japanese-language version of the Physical Performance Test (PPT) Battery in chronic pain patients
    Sato, D
    Kaneko, F
    Okamura, H
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2006, 28 (06) : 397 - 405
  • [50] Reliability and validity of the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status in community-dwelling elderly
    Cheng, Yan
    Wu, Wenyuan
    Wang, Jiaqi
    Feng, Wei
    Wu, Xiangwei
    Li, Chunbo
    ARCHIVES OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2011, 7 (05) : 850 - 857