Reliability and validity of a computerized neurocognitive test battery, CNS Vital Signs

被引:622
作者
Gualtieri, C. Thomas
Johnson, Lynda G.
机构
[1] N Carolina Neuropsychiat Clin, Dept Neuropsychiat, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[2] N Carolina Neuropsychiat Clin, Dept Neuropsychol, Chapel Hill, NC USA
关键词
test development; reliability; concurrent validity; normative data; computerized test; memory; psychomotor speed; reaction time; complex attention; cognitive flexibility; CNS Vital Signs;
D O I
10.1016/j.acn.2006.05.007
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
CNS Vital Signs (CNSVS) is a computerized neurocognitive test battery that was developed as a routine clinical screening instrument. It is comprised of seven tests: verbal and visual memory, finger tapping, symbol digit coding, the Stroop Test, a test of shifting attention and the continuous performance test. Because CNSVS is a battery of well-known neuropsychological tests, one should expect its psychometric properties to resemble those of the conventional tests upon which it is based. 1069 subjects age 7-90 participated in the normative database for CNSVS. Test-retest reliability (TRT) was evaluated in 99 Ss who took the battery on two separate occasions, separated, on the average, by 62 days; the results were comparable to those achieved by equivalent conventional and computerized tests. Concurrent validity studies in 180 subjects, normals and neuropsychiatric patients, indicate correlations that are comparable to the concurrent validity of similar tests. Discriminant validity is supported by studies of patients with mild cognitive impairment and dementia, post-concussion syndrome and severe traumatic brain injury, ADHD (treated and untreated) and depression (treated and untreated). The tests in CNSVS are also sensitive to malingerers and patients with conversion disorders. The psychometric characteristics of the tests in the CNSVS battery are very similar to the characteristics of the conventional neuropsychological tests upon which they are based. CNSVS is suitable for use as ascreening instrument, or as a serial assessment measure. But it is not a substitute for formal neuropsychological testing, it is not diagnostic, and it will have only a limited role in the medical setting, absent the active participation of consulting neuropsychologists. (c) 2006 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of National Academy of Neuropsychology.
引用
收藏
页码:623 / 643
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Test-Retest Reliability and Practice Effects of a Computerized Neuropsychological Battery: A Solution-Oriented Approach
    Rijnen, Sophie J. M.
    van der Linden, Sophie D.
    Emons, Wilco H. M.
    Sitskoorn, Margriet M.
    Gehring, Karin
    PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2018, 30 (12) : 1652 - 1662
  • [22] The Validity and Reliability of the Language Battery in Comprehensive Aphasia Test-Turkish (CAT-TR)
    Şevket Özdemir
    İlknur Maviş
    Aylin Müge Tunçer
    Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 2022, 51 : 789 - 802
  • [23] Validity of the Mindstreams™ computerized cognitive battery for mild cognitive impairment
    Tzvi Dwolatzky
    Victor Whitehead
    Glen M. Doniger
    Ely S. Simon
    Avraham Schweiger
    Dena Jaffe
    Howard Chertkow
    Journal of Molecular Neuroscience, 2004, 24 : 33 - 44
  • [24] Validity of the Mindstreams™ computerized cognitive battery for mild cognitive impairment
    Dwolatzky, T
    Whitehead, V
    Doniger, GM
    Simon, ES
    Schweiger, A
    Jaffe, D
    Chertkow, H
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR NEUROSCIENCE, 2004, 24 (01) : 33 - 44
  • [25] EFFECTS OF MARIJUANA ON PERFORMANCE OF A COMPUTERIZED COGNITIVE-NEUROMOTOR TEST BATTERY
    WILSON, WH
    ELLINWOOD, EH
    MATHEW, RJ
    JOHNSON, K
    PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 1994, 51 (02) : 115 - 125
  • [26] Validity of the Computerized Battery for Neuropsychological Evaluation of Children (BENCI) in Spanish Children: Preliminary Results
    Fernandez-Alcantara, Manuel
    Albaladejo-Blazquez, Natalia
    Inmaculada Fernandez-Avalos, Maria
    Sanchez-SanSegundo, Miriam
    Cruz-Quintana, Francisco
    Perez-Martinez, Vanesa
    Carrasco-Sanchez, Claudia
    Nieves Perez-Marfil, Maria
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATION IN HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY AND EDUCATION, 2022, 12 (08) : 893 - 903
  • [27] Test-Retest Reliability and Validity of the Sniffin' TOM Odor Memory Test
    Croy, Ilona
    Zehner, Cora
    Larsson, Maria
    Zucco, Gesualdo M.
    Hummel, Thomas
    CHEMICAL SENSES, 2015, 40 (03) : 173 - 179
  • [28] Assessment of the validity and reliability of a diagnostic test
    Donis, Jose H.
    AVANCES EN BIOMEDICINA, 2012, 1 (02): : 73 - 81
  • [29] Reliability and Validity of Computerized Adventitious Respiratory Sounds in People with Bronchiectasis
    Herrero-Cortina, Beatriz
    Francin-Gallego, Marina
    Antonio Saez-Perez, Juan
    San Miguel-Pagola, Marta
    Anoro-Abenoza, Laura
    Gomez-Gonzalez, Cristina
    Montero-Marco, Jesica
    Charlo-Bernardos, Marta
    Altarribas-Bolsa, Elena
    Perez-Trullen, Alfonso
    Jacome, Cristina
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (24)
  • [30] Reliability and validity of a computerized questionnaire to measure fat intake in Belgium
    Vandelanotte, C
    Matthys, C
    De Bourdeaudhuij, I
    NUTRITION RESEARCH, 2004, 24 (08) : 621 - 631