Development and validation of a Dignity in Care Scale for Nurses

被引:13
作者
Lin, Yea-Pyng [1 ]
Tsai, Yun-Fang [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Mennonite Christian Hosp, Hualien, Taiwan
[2] Chang Gung Univ, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[3] Chang Gung Univ Sci & Technol, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[4] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Taoyuan, Taiwan
关键词
Dignity in care; nursing; patient; reliability; scale; validity; CLINICAL CARE; PERSPECTIVES; CHALLENGES; RESPECT; HEALTH; VIEWS;
D O I
10.1177/0969733018819120
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Maintaining patient dignity is an important aspect of nursing care. No instrument is currently available to measure nurses' behaviours for maintaining patient dignity in clinical care. Objectives: To develop and test an instrument to measure activities nurses perform to maintain patient dignity in clinical care settings, guided by the literature and face-to-face interviews. Research design: A quantitative cross-sectional descriptive survey collected data from the developed scale, which was analysed by descriptive statistics and factor analysis. Participants and research context: Convenience samples of nurses participated in the interviews (n = 40) and examined face validity of the scale (n = 20). A purposive sample of 610 nurses was recruited from four regional hospitals in the northern, southern and eastern areas of Taiwan to test the developed scale. Ethical considerations: Research was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the study hospital. Information about the study was provided to nurses and those willing to participate provided written informed consent prior to data collection. Findings: The 36-item Dignity in Care Scale for Nurses had acceptable content and face validity. Factor analysis identified six factors necessary for maintaining dignity of patient care: communication skills, confidentiality of patient information, prompt response to patient needs, respect for patient's autonomy, providing a safe environment and protecting the patient's well-being. The reliability coefficient for the total scale was 0.93; alpha coefficients for the subscales ranged from 0.70 to 0.94. Discussion: The Dignity in Care Scale for Nurses was demonstrated to be a reliable and valid tool for assessing how nurses maintain dignity in care for patients in the clinical setting. The questionnaire can be used to provide feedback to nurses regarding patient dignity. Conclusion: Data gained from this instrument could be used to design nursing education programmes to help nurses enhance their abilities for maintaining patient dignity in clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页码:2467 / 2481
页数:15
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [31] Patients' expectations of the maintenance of their dignity
    Matiti, Milika R.
    Trorey, Gillian M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2008, 17 (20) : 2709 - 2717
  • [32] Childbearing women's perceptions of nursing care that promotes dignity
    Matthews, R
    Callister, LC
    [J]. JOGNN-JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC GYNECOLOGIC AND NEONATAL NURSING, 2004, 33 (04): : 498 - 507
  • [33] National Union of Nurses' Association ROC, 2016, NURS ETH PRINC
  • [34] Nunnally JC., 1978, Psychometric Theory, V2
  • [35] Parandeh Akram, 2016, Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res, V21, P1, DOI 10.4103/1735-9066.174750
  • [36] Polit DF., 2021, Nursing Research Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice, V11
  • [37] Nurses' perceptions of professional dignity in hospital settings
    Sabatino, Laura
    Kangasniemi, Mari Katariina
    Rocco, Gennaro
    Alvaro, Rosaria
    Stievano, Alessandro
    [J]. NURSING ETHICS, 2016, 23 (03) : 277 - 293
  • [38] The dignity of the nursing profession: A meta-synthesis of qualitative research
    Sabatino, Laura
    Stievano, Alessandro
    Rocco, Gennaro
    Kallio, Hanna
    Pietila, Anna-Maija
    Kangasniemi, Mari K.
    [J]. NURSING ETHICS, 2014, 21 (06) : 659 - 672
  • [39] Patients' dignity in a rehabilitation ward:: Ethical challenges for nursing staff
    Stabell, A
    Nåden, D
    [J]. NURSING ETHICS, 2006, 13 (03) : 236 - 248
  • [40] Professional dignity in nursing in clinical and community workplaces
    Stievano, Alessandro
    De Marinis, Maria Grazia
    Russo, Maria Teresa
    Rocco, Gennaro
    Alvaro, Rosaria
    [J]. NURSING ETHICS, 2012, 19 (03) : 341 - 356