Vicarious hypocrisy: Bolstering attitudes and taking action after exposure to a hypocritical ingroup member

被引:18
作者
Focella, Elizabeth S. [1 ]
Stone, Jeff [1 ]
Fernandez, Nicholas C. [1 ]
Cooper, Joel [2 ]
Hogg, Michael A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
[2] Princeton Univ, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
[3] Claremont Grad Univ, Claremont, CA USA
关键词
Cognitive dissonance; Hypocrisy; Vicarious; Attitudes; Self-affirmation; SUBJECTIVE GROUP-DYNAMICS; IN-GROUP; BLACK SHEEP; SELF-AFFIRMATION; DISSONANCE; JUDGMENTS; IDENTIFICATION; DEROGATION; EXTREMITY; ORDER;
D O I
10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.014
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Four studies tested the prediction that when highly identified group members observe another ingroup member behave hypocritically, they experience vicarious hypocrisy, which they reduce by bolstering their support for the ingroup hypocrite's message. Participants in Experiment 1 (N = 161) who witnessed a similar ingroup member act hypocritically about using sunscreen reported more positive attitudes toward using sunscreen than participants exposed to an outgroup hypocrite or to a dissimilar ingroup hypocrite. The effect of vicarious hypocrisy on attitude bolstering was attenuated in Experiment 2 (N = 68) when ingroup identity was affirmed. In Experiment 3 (N = 64), more highly identified participants acquired sunscreen when a fellow ingroup member's hypocrisy was attributed to high compared to low choice. Experiment 4 (N = 68) showed that a misattribution cue attenuated the effect of vicarious hypocrisy on sunscreen acquisition. The discussion focuses on the vicarious dissonance processes that motivate some observers to defend, rather than reject, a hypocritical ingroup member. (C) 2015 Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:89 / 102
页数:14
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
Aiken L.S., 1991, Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interaction
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2007, COGNITIVE DISSONANCE, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781446214282
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1957, Selective Exposure Theory
[4]   The power of self-persuasion [J].
Aronson, E .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1999, 54 (11) :875-884
[5]   OVERCOMING DENIAL AND INCREASING THE INTENTION TO USE CONDOMS THROUGH THE INDUCTION OF HYPOCRISY [J].
ARONSON, E ;
FRIED, C ;
STONE, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1991, 81 (12) :1636-1638
[6]   Saying one thing and doing another: Examining the impact of event order on hypocrisy judgments of others [J].
Barden, J ;
Rucker, DD ;
Petty, RE .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2005, 31 (11) :1463-1474
[7]   Order of actions mitigates hypocrisy judgments for ingroup more than outgroup members [J].
Barden, Jamie ;
Rucker, Derek D. ;
Petty, Richard E. ;
Rios, Kimberly .
GROUP PROCESSES & INTERGROUP RELATIONS, 2014, 17 (05) :590-601
[8]   What's Wrong with Morality? [J].
Batson, C. Daniel .
EMOTION REVIEW, 2011, 3 (03) :230-236
[9]   IN-GROUP OR OUT-GROUP EXTREMITY - IMPORTANCE OF THE THREATENED SOCIAL IDENTITY [J].
BRANSCOMBE, NR ;
WANN, DL ;
NOEL, JG ;
COLEMAN, J .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 1993, 19 (04) :381-388
[10]  
Cohen D, 2005, ONT SYMP P, V10, P49