Nerve autofluorescence in near-ultraviolet light markedly enhances nerve visualization in vivo

被引:12
作者
Dip, Fernando [1 ,2 ]
Bregoli, Pedro [1 ]
Falco, Jorge [1 ]
White, Kevin P. [3 ]
Rosenthal, Raul J. [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Buenos Aires, Inst Argentino Diagnost & Tratamiento, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[2] Cleveland Clin Florida, Weston, FL 33325 USA
[3] ScienceRight Res Consulting, London, ON, Canada
[4] Cleveland Clin Florida, 2950 Cleveland Clin Blvd, Weston, FL 33331 USA
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2022年 / 36卷 / 03期
关键词
Nerve; Autofluorescence; Near-ultraviolet light; Spectroscopy; Nerve-sparing surgery;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-021-08484-0
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background During surgery, surgeons must accurately localize nerves to avoid injuring them. Recently, we have discovered that nerves fluoresce in near-ultraviolet light (NUV) light. The aims of the current study were to determine the extent to which nerves fluoresce more brightly than background and vascular structures in NUV light, and identify the NUV intensity at which nerves are most distinguishable from other tissues. Methods We exposed sciatic nerves within the posterior thigh in five 250-300 gm Wistar rats, then observed them at four different NUV intensity levels: 20%, 35%, 50%, and 100%. Brightness of fluorescence was measured by fluorescence spectroscopy, quantified as a fluorescence score using Image-J software, and statistically compared between nerves, background, and both an artery and vein by unpaired Student's t tests with Bonferroni adjustment to accommodate multiple comparisons. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated for each NUV intensity. Results At 20, 35, 50, and 100% NUV intensity, fluorescence scores for nerves versus background tissues were 117.4 versus 40.0, 225.8 versus 88.0, 250.6 versus 121.4, and 252.8 versus 169.4, respectively (all p < 0.001). Fluorescence scores plateaued at 50% NUV intensity for nerves, but continued to rise for background. At 35%, 50%, and 100% NUV intensity, a fluorescence score of 200 was 100% sensitive, specific, and accurate identifying nerves. At 100 NUV intensity, artery and vein scores were 61.8 and 60.0, both dramatically lower than for nerves (p < 0.001). Conclusions At all NUV intensities >= 35%, a fluorescence score of 200 is 100% accurate distinguishing nerves from other anatomical structures in vivo.
引用
收藏
页码:1999 / 2005
页数:7
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] Parathyroid gland management using optical technologies during thyroidectomy or parathyroidectomy: A systematic review
    Abbaci, Muriel
    De Leeuw, Frederic
    Breuskin, Ingrid
    Casiraghi, Odile
    Ben Lakhdar, Aicha
    Ghanem, Wahib
    Laplace-Builhe, Corinne
    Hartl, Dana
    [J]. ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 87 : 186 - 196
  • [2] Classification of ultraviolet irradiated mouse skin histological stages by bimodal spectroscopy: multiple excitation autofluorescence and diffuse reflectance
    Amouroux, Marine
    Diaz-Ayil, Gilberto
    Blondel, Walter C. P. M.
    Bourg-Heckly, Genevieve
    Leroux, Agnes
    Guillemin, Francois
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL OPTICS, 2009, 14 (01)
  • [3] Applications of fundus autofluorescence and widefield angiography in clinical practice
    Banda, Himanshu K.
    Shah, Gaurav K.
    Blinder, Kevin J.
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY-JOURNAL CANADIEN D OPHTALMOLOGIE, 2019, 54 (01): : 11 - 19
  • [4] Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: first, do no harm; second, take care of bile duct stones
    Berci, George
    Hunter, John
    Morgenstern, Leon
    Arregui, Maurice
    Brunt, Michael
    Carroll, Brandon
    Edye, Michael
    Fermelia, David
    Ferzli, George
    Greene, Frederick
    Petelin, Joseph
    Phillips, Edward
    Ponsky, Jeffrey
    Sax, Harry
    Schwaitzberg, Steven
    Soper, Nathaniel
    Swanstrom, Lee
    Traverso, William
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2013, 27 (04): : 1051 - 1054
  • [5] Does Laser Surgery Interfere with Optical Nerve Identification in Maxillofacial Hard and Soft Tissue?-An Experimental Ex Vivo Study
    Bergauer, Bastian
    Knipfer, Christian
    Amann, Andreas
    Rohde, Maximilian
    Tangermann-Gerk, Katja
    Adler, Werner
    Schmidt, Michael
    Nkenke, Emeka
    Stelzle, Florian
    [J]. SENSORS, 2015, 15 (10) : 25416 - 25432
  • [6] Methods for bladder cancer diagnosis - The role of autofluorescence and photodynamic diagnosis
    Bochenek, Kamil
    Aebisher, David
    Miedzybrodzka, Anna
    Cieslar, Grzegorz
    Kawczyk-Krupka, Aleksandra
    [J]. PHOTODIAGNOSIS AND PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY, 2019, 27 : 141 - 148
  • [7] Autofluorescence and diffuse reflectance properties of malignant and benign breast tissues
    Breslin, TM
    Xu, FS
    Palmer, GM
    Zhu, CF
    Gilchrist, KW
    Ramanujam, N
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 11 (01) : 65 - 70
  • [8] Autofluorescence spectroscopy in liver transplantation: Preliminary results from a pilot clinical study
    Castro-e-Silva, O.
    Sankarankutty, A. K.
    Correa, R. B.
    Ferreira, J.
    Vollet-Filho, J. D.
    Kurachi, C.
    Bagnato, V. S.
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2008, 40 (03) : 722 - 725
  • [9] Traumatic peripheral nerve injuries: epidemiological findings, neuropathic pain and quality of life in 158 patients
    Ciaramitaro, Palma
    Mondelli, Mauro
    Logullo, Francesco
    Grimaldi, Serena
    Battiston, Bruno
    Sard, Arman
    Scarinzi, Cecilia
    Migliaretti, Giuseppe
    Faccani, Giuliano
    Cocito, Dario
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE PERIPHERAL NERVOUS SYSTEM, 2010, 15 (02) : 120 - 127
  • [10] Intraoperative Fluorescence Imaging of Peripheral and Central Nerves Through a Myelin-Selective Contrast Agent
    Cotero, Victoria E.
    Siclovan, Tiberiu
    Zhang, Rong
    Carter, Randall L.
    Bajaj, Anshika
    LaPlante, Nicole E.
    Kim, Evgenia
    Gray, Daniel
    Staudinger, V. Paul
    Yazdanfar, Siavash
    Hehir, Cristina A. Tan
    [J]. MOLECULAR IMAGING AND BIOLOGY, 2012, 14 (06) : 708 - 717