Orthosis in Thoracolumbar Fractures A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

被引:13
作者
Linhares, Daniela [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Pinto, Bernardo Sousa [1 ,2 ]
da Silva, Manuel Ribeiro [3 ,4 ]
Neves, Nuno [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Fonseca, Joao A. [2 ,6 ,7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] CINTESIS, Ctr Hlth Technol & Serv Res, Porto, Portugal
[2] Univ Porto, Dept Med Comun Inform & Dec Saude, MEDCIDS, Fac Med,FMUP, Porto, Portugal
[3] Ctr Hosp Sao Joao, Ortopedia & Traumatol, Porto, Portugal
[4] Hosp CUF Porto, Ortopedia, Porto, Portugal
[5] Univ Porto, FMUP, Dept Cirurgia & Fisiol, Fac Med, Porto, Portugal
[6] Ctr Hlth Technol & Serv Res CINTESIS, Patient Centred Innovat & Technol Grp PaCeIT, Porto, Portugal
[7] Med Educ I&D & Aval Lda MEDIDA, Porto, Portugal
[8] CUF Porto, Imunoalergol, Porto, Portugal
关键词
conservative treatment; emergency department; lumbar region; meta-analysis; orthotic devices; randomized controlled trial; spinal fractures; spine; systematic review; thoracic region; BURST FRACTURES; SPINAL ORTHOSES; NO ORTHOSIS; INJURY; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0000000000003655
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial (RCT). Objective. The aim of this study was to evaluate radiological and clinical outcomes of acute traumatic thoracolumbar fractures in skeletally mature patients treated with orthosis, versus no immobilization. Summary of Background Data. Orthosis is traditionally used in conservative treatment of thoracolumbar fractures. However, recent studies suggest no benefit, and a possible negative impact in recovery. Methods. Databases were searched from inception to June 2019. Studies were selected in two phases by two blinded reviewers; disagreements were solved by consensus. Inclusion criteria were: RCT; only patients with acute traumatic thoracolumbar fractures; primary conservative treatment; comparison between orthosis and no orthosis. Exclusion criteria were inclusion of nonacute fractures, patients with other significant known diseases and comparison of groups different than use of an orthosis. Two independent reviewers performed data extraction and quality assessment. Fixed-effects models were used upon no heterogeneity, and random-effects model in the remaining cases. A previous plan for extraction of radiological (kyphosis progression; loss of anterior height) and clinical (pain; disability; length of stay) outcomes was applied. PRISMA guidelines were followed. Results. Eight articles/five studies were included (267 participants). None reported significant differences in pain, kyphosis progression, and loss of anterior height. One reported a better ODI with orthosis at 12 but not at 24 weeks. No other study reported differences in disability. All authors concluded an equivalence between treatments. Meta-analysis showed a significant increase of 3.47days (95% confidence interval 1.35- 5.60) in mean admission time in orthosis group. No differences were found in kyphosis at 6 and 12 months; kyphosis progression between 0 to 6 and 0 to 12 months; loss of anterior height 0 to 6 months; VAS for pain at 6 months; VAS change 0 to 6 months. Conclusion. Orthosis seems to add no benefit in conservative treatment of acute thoracolumbar fractures. This should be considered in guidelines and reviews of health care policies.
引用
收藏
页码:E1523 / E1531
页数:9
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Spinal Orthoses [J].
Agabegi, Steven S. ;
Asghar, Ferhan A. ;
Herkowitz, Harry N. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2010, 18 (11) :657-667
[2]   Orthosis for thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurologic deficit: A systematic review of prospective randomized controlled trials [J].
Alcala-Cerra, Gabriel ;
Paternina-Caicedo, Angel J. ;
Diaz-Becerra, Cindy ;
Moscote-Salazar, Luis R. ;
Fernandes-Joaquim, Andrei .
JOURNAL OF CRANIOVERTEBRAL JUNCTION AND SPINE, 2014, 5 (01) :25-32
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Review Manager (RevMan). Version 5.3
[4]   Orthosis versus no orthosis for the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurologic injury: a multicenter prospective randomized equivalence trial [J].
Bailey, Christopher S. ;
Urquhart, Jennifer C. ;
Dvorak, Marcel F. ;
Nadeau, Melissa ;
Boyd, Michael C. ;
Thomas, Ken C. ;
Kwon, Brian K. ;
Gurr, Kevin R. ;
Bailey, Stewart I. ;
Fisher, Charles G. .
SPINE JOURNAL, 2014, 14 (11) :2557-2564
[5]   Comparison of thoracolumbosacral orthosis and no orthosis for the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures: interim analysis of a multicenter randomized clinical equivalence trial Clinical article [J].
Bailey, Christopher S. ;
Dvorak, Marcel F. ;
Thomas, Kenneth C. ;
Boyd, Michael C. ;
Paquett, Scott ;
Kwon, Brian K. ;
France, John ;
Gurr, Kevin R. ;
Bailey, Stewart I. ;
Fisher, Charles G. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2009, 11 (03) :295-303
[6]  
Boyd M, 2007, CAN J SURG, V50, pS11
[7]  
Cha Kyung Han, 2013, Korean J Spine, V10, P144
[8]   Bracing for thoracolumbar fractures [J].
Chang, Victor ;
Holly, Langston T. .
NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2014, 37 (01)
[9]   Prospective study of spinal orthoses in women [J].
Dionyssiotis, Yannis ;
Trovas, Georgios ;
Thoma, Sofia ;
Lyritis, George ;
Papaioannou, Nikolaos .
PROSTHETICS AND ORTHOTICS INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 39 (06) :487-495
[10]   Overutilization of bracing in the management of penetrating spinal cord injury from gunshot wounds [J].
Eftekhary, Nima ;
Nwosu, Kenneth ;
McCoy, Eric ;
Fukunaga, Dudley ;
Rolfe, Kevin .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2016, 25 (01) :110-113