Visual word recognition in a second language: A test of the lexical entrenchment hypothesis with lexical decision times

被引:62
作者
Brysbaert, Marc [1 ]
Lagrou, Evelyne [1 ]
Stevens, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
关键词
bilingualism; word recognition; masked priming; lexical decision; lexical entrenchment; diffusion model; ORTHOGRAPHIC NEIGHBORHOOD; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; SENTENCE CONTEXT; MODEL; LANGUAGE; ENGLISH; FREQUENCY; BILINGUALS; 1ST; MULTIPLE;
D O I
10.1017/S1366728916000353
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
The word frequency effect is stronger in second language (L2) processing than in first language (L1) processing. According to the lexical entrenchment hypothesis, this difference is not due to a qualitative difference in word processing between L1 and L2, but can be explained by differences in exposure to the target language: People with less exposure to a language show a steeper frequency curve for that language. Exposure differences can be measured with a vocabulary test. The present study tested whether the lexical entrenchment hypothesis provides an adequate explanation for differences in lexical decision times. To this end, we compared the performance of 56 Dutch-English bilinguals to that of 1011 English L1 speakers on 420 English six-letter words. In line with previous research, the differences in the word frequency effect between word processing in L1 and in L2 became vanishingly small once vocabulary size was entered as a predictor. Only in a diffusion model analysis did we find some evidence that the information build-up may be slower in L1 than in L2, independent of vocabulary size. We further report effects of cognates, age-of-acquisition, and neighborhood size that can also be explained in terms of differences in exposure.
引用
收藏
页码:530 / 548
页数:19
相关论文
共 64 条
[31]  
Harrell FE, 2001, Regression Modeling Strategies: With Applications to Linear Models, Logistic Regression, and Survival Analysis
[32]  
Heredia R. R., 2014, Foundations of bilingual memory
[33]   An adjusted boxplot for skewed distributions [J].
Hubert, M. ;
Vandervieren, E. .
COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS & DATA ANALYSIS, 2008, 52 (12) :5186-5201
[34]   EARLY VOCABULARY GROWTH - RELATION TO LANGUAGE INPUT AND GENDER [J].
HUTTENLOCHER, J ;
HAIGHT, W ;
BRYK, A ;
SELTZER, M ;
LYONS, T .
DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 27 (02) :236-248
[35]  
Izura C., 2002, Psicologica, V23, P245
[36]   Nonselective access of English phonology in bi-scriptal Chinese-Korean visual word recognition [J].
Jin, Zheng .
COGNITIVE PROCESSING, 2013, 14 (04) :435-441
[37]   Extension of Nakagawa & Schielzeth's R2GLMM to random slopes models [J].
Johnson, Paul C. D. .
METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2014, 5 (09) :944-946
[38]   Word knowledge in the crowd: Measuring vocabulary size and word prevalence in a massive online experiment [J].
Keuleers, Emmanuel ;
Stevens, Michael ;
Mandera, Pawel ;
Brysbaert, Marc .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 68 (08) :1665-1692
[39]   The British Lexicon Project: Lexical decision data for 28,730 monosyllabic and disyllabic English words [J].
Keuleers, Emmanuel ;
Lacey, Paula ;
Rastle, Kathleen ;
Brysbaert, Marc .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2012, 44 (01) :287-304
[40]   Practice effects in large-scale visual word recognition studies: a lexical decision study on 14,000 Dutch mono- and disyllabic words and nonwords [J].
Keuleers, Emmanuel ;
Diependaele, Kevin ;
Brysbaert, Marc .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 1