Effects of Age at Cochlear Implantation on Vocabulary and Grammar: A Review of the Evidence

被引:37
|
作者
Duchesne, Louise [1 ]
Marschark, Marc [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Quebec Trois Rivieres, Dept Orthophonie, Trois Rivieres, PQ, Canada
[2] Rochester Inst Technol, Natl Tech Inst Deaf, Rochester, NY 14623 USA
关键词
PRELINGUALLY DEAF-CHILDREN; SPOKEN LANGUAGE-DEVELOPMENT; EARLY AUDITORY EXPERIENCE; SPEECH-PERCEPTION; COMMUNICATION DEVELOPMENT; SOCIOECONOMIC-STATUS; EXPRESSIVE LANGUAGE; YOUNG-CHILDREN; FOLLOW-UP; 1ST YEAR;
D O I
10.1044/2019_AJSLP-18-0161
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Purpose: The increasing prevalence of pediatric cochlear implantation over the past 25 years has left little doubt that resulting improvements in hearing offer significant benefits to language development for many deaf children. Furthermore, given the documented importance of access to language from birth, there has been strong support for providing congenitally deaf children with implants as early as possible. Earliest implantation, in many ways, has become the "gold standard" in pediatric cochlear implantation, on the assumption that it is the key to language development similar to that of hearing children. Empirical evidence to support this assumption, however, appears more equivocal than generally is believed. This article reviews recent research aimed at assessing the impact of age at implantation on vocabulary and grammatical development among young implant users. Method: Articles published between 2003 and 2018 that included age at implantation as a variable of interest and in which it was subjected to statistical analysis were considered. Effect sizes were calculated whenever possible; we conducted a multivariate meta-analysis to compare outcomes in different language domains. Results: Taken together, findings from 49 studies suggest that age at implantation is just one of a host of variables that influence vocabulary and grammatical development, its impact varying with several factors including whether age at implantation is treated as a dichotomous or continuous variable. Results from a meta-analysis showed significant differences across language domains. Conclusion: The pattern of results obtained indicates the importance of considering various child, family, and environmental characteristics in future research aimed at determining how early "early implantation" needs to be and the extent to which age at implantation, duration of implant use, and other factors influence language and language-related outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:1673 / 1691
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Effects of age at implantation in young children
    Kirk, KI
    Miyamoto, RT
    Lento, CL
    Ying, E
    O'Neill, T
    Fears, B
    ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 2002, 111 (05) : 69 - 73
  • [42] Evidence-Based Inclusion Criteria for Cochlear Implantation in Patients With Postlingual Deafness
    Snel-Bongers, Jorien
    Netten, Anouk P.
    Boermans, Peter-Paul B. M.
    Rotteveel, Liselotte J. C.
    Briaire, Jeroen J.
    Frijns, Johan H. M.
    EAR AND HEARING, 2018, 39 (05) : 1008 - 1014
  • [43] Influence of age at implantation and of residual hearing on speech outcome measures after cochlear implantation: binary partitioning analysis
    El-Hakim, H
    Abdolell, M
    Mount, RJ
    Papsin, BC
    Harrison, RV
    ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 2002, 111 (05) : 102 - 108
  • [44] The Relationship between Vocabulary Knowledge and Speech Perception in School-Age Children using Cochlear Implants
    Park, Hye-Jin
    Han, Sung-Ah
    Choi, Jae-Hee
    Sim, Sang-Yong
    Seo, Young-Ran
    Jang, Hyun-Sook
    COMMUNICATION SCIENCES AND DISORDERS-CSD, 2016, 21 (03): : 488 - 501
  • [45] Bilateral cochlear implantation versus unilateral cochlear implantation in deaf children: Effects of sentence context and listening conditions on recognition of spoken words in sentences
    Lee, Youngmee
    Sim, Hyunsub
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2020, 137
  • [46] Central effects of residual hearing: Implications for choice of ear for cochlear implantation
    Francis, HW
    Yeagle, JD
    Brightwell, T
    Venick, H
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2004, 114 (10) : 1747 - 1752
  • [47] Effects of Cochlear Implantation on Binaural Hearing in Adults With Unilateral Hearing Loss
    Buss, Emily
    Dillon, Margaret T.
    Rooth, Meredith A.
    King, English R.
    Deres, Ellen J.
    Buchman, Craig A.
    Pillsbury, Harold C.
    Brown, Kevin D.
    TRENDS IN HEARING, 2018, 22
  • [48] Age at implantation and communicative outcome in pediatric cochlear implant users: Is younger always better?
    Holt, RF
    Svirsky, MA
    Neuburger, H
    Miyamoto, RT
    COCHLEAR IMPLANTS, 2004, 1273 : 368 - 371
  • [49] Benefits and risks related to cochlear implantation for children with residual hearing: a systematic review
    Na, Eunjung
    Toupin-April, Karine
    Olds, Janet
    Chen, Jianyong
    Fitzpatrick, Elizabeth M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2024, 63 (02) : 75 - 86
  • [50] Cochlear implantation in children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder: an updated systematic review
    Sahwan, Maryam
    Abdelsamad, Yassin
    Alasfoor, Fatema
    Alfayez, Fatema
    Binkhamis, Ghada
    Nichani, Jaya
    EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2024, 281 (03) : 1149 - 1162