Machine Learning Models with Preoperative Risk Factors and Intraoperative Hypotension Parameters Predict Mortality After Cardiac Surgery

被引:32
作者
Fernandes, Marta Priscila Bento [1 ]
Armengol de la Hoz, Miguel [2 ,3 ]
Rangasamy, Valluvan [4 ]
Subramaniam, Balachundhar [4 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Med Sch, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Neurol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Cardiol Div, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Univ Politicn Madrid, ETSI Telecomunicac, Biomed Technol Ctr CTB, Biomed Engn & Telemed Grp, Madrid, Spain
[4] Harvard Med Sch, Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesia Crit Care & Pain Med, Ctr Anesthesia Res Excellence, Boston, MA 02115 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Machine learning; mortality prediction; intraoperative hypotension; cardiac surgery; intraoperative adverse factors; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; INDUCTION; OUTCOMES; SOCIETY; SCORE;
D O I
10.1053/j.jvca.2020.07.029
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Objectives: Machine learning models used to predict postoperative mortality rarely include intraoperative factors. Several intraoperative factors like hypotension (IOH), vasopressor-inotropes, and cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time are significantly associated with postoperative outcomes. The authors explored the ability of machine learning models incorporating intraoperative risk factors to predict mortality after cardiac surgery. Design: Retrospective study. Setting: Tertiary hospital. Participants: A total of 5,015 adults who underwent cardiac surgery from 2008 to 2016. Intervention: None. Measurements and Main Results: The intraoperative phase was divided into the following: (1) CPB, (2) outside CPB, and (3) total surgery for quantifying IOH only. Phase-specific IOH parameters (area under the curve for mean arterial pressure <65 mmHg), vasopressor-inotropes (norepinephrine equivalents), duration, and cross-clamp time, along with preoperative risk factors ,were incorporated into the models. The primary outcome was mortality. The following 5 models were applied to 3 intraoperative phases separately: (1) logistic regression, (2) random forests, (3) neural networks, (4) support vector machines, and (5) extreme gradient boosting (XGB). Mortality was predicted using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Of 5,015 patients included, 112 (2.2%) died. XGB model from the outside-CPB phase predicted mortality better with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 95% confidence interval (CD: 0.88(0.83-0.94); positive predictive value, 0.10(0.06-0.15); specificity 0.85 (0.83-0.87) and sensitivity 0.75 (0.57-0.90). Conclusion: XGB machine learning model from IOH outside the CPB phase seemed to offer a better discrimination, sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value compared with other models. Machine learning models incorporating intraoperative adverse factors might offer better predictive ability for risk stratification and triaging of patients after cardiac surgery. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:857 / 865
页数:9
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Cross-clamp time is an independent predictor of mortality and morbidity in low- and high-risk cardiac patients [J].
Al-Sarraf, Nael ;
Thalib, Lukman ;
Hughes, Anne ;
Houlihan, Maighread ;
Tolan, Michael ;
Young, Vincent ;
McGovern, Eillish .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2011, 9 (01) :104-109
[2]   A Comparison of a Machine Learning Model with EuroSCORE II in Predicting Mortality after Elective Cardiac Surgery: A Decision Curve Analysis [J].
Allyn, Jerome ;
Allou, Nicolas ;
Augustin, Pascal ;
Philip, Ivan ;
Martinet, Olivier ;
Belghiti, Myriem ;
Provenchere, Sophie ;
Montravers, Philippe ;
Ferdynus, Cyril .
PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (01)
[3]   Does EuroSCORE II perform better than its original versions? A multicentre validation study [J].
Barili, Fabio ;
Pacini, Davide ;
Capo, Antonio ;
Rasovic, Olivera ;
Grossi, Claudio ;
Alamanni, Francesco ;
Di Bartolomeo, Roberto ;
Parolari, Alessandro .
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2013, 34 (01) :22-29
[4]   Perioperative Organ Injury [J].
Bartels, Karsten ;
Karhausen, Joern ;
Clambey, Eric T. ;
Grenz, Almut ;
Eltzschig, Holger K. .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2013, 119 (06) :1474-1489
[5]   Surgical Risk Is Not Linear: Derivation and Validation of a Novel, User-friendly, and Machine-learning-based Predictive OpTimal Trees in Emergency Surgery Risk (POTTER) Calculator [J].
Bertsimas, Dimitris ;
Dunn, Jack ;
Velmahos, George C. ;
Kaafarani, Haytham M. A. .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2018, 268 (04) :574-583
[6]   Data Science: Big Data, Machine Learning, and Artificial Intelligence [J].
Carlos, Ruth C. ;
Kahn, Charles E. ;
Halabi, Safwan .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2018, 15 (03) :497-498
[7]   Hypotension during induction of anaesthesia is neither a reliable nor a useful quality measure for comparison of anaesthetists' performance [J].
Epstein, R. H. ;
Dexter, F. ;
Schwenk, E. S. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2017, 119 (01) :106-114
[8]  
Ho TK, 1998, IEEE T PATTERN ANAL, V20, P832, DOI 10.1109/34.709601
[9]   Arterial pressure above the upper cerebral autoregulation limit during cardiopulmonary bypass is associated with postoperative delirium [J].
Hori, D. ;
Brown, C. ;
Ono, M. ;
Rappold, T. ;
Sieber, F. ;
Gottschalk, A. ;
Neufeld, K. J. ;
Gottesman, R. ;
Adachi, H. ;
Hogue, C. W. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2014, 113 (06) :1009-1017
[10]   Blood Pressure Coefficient of Variation and Its Association With Cardiac Surgical Outcomes [J].
Jinadasa, Sayuri P. ;
Mueller, Ariel ;
Prasad, Varesh ;
Subramaniam, Kathirvel ;
Heldt, Thomas ;
Novack, Victor ;
Subramaniam, Balachundhar .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2018, 127 (04) :832-839