Exercise on Prescription: A Cross-sectional Study With Self-reported Outcome

被引:6
作者
Pedersen, Helene Buch [1 ]
Helmer-Nielsen, Morten
Dieperink, Karin Brochstedt [2 ]
Ostergaard, Birte [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coll Lillebaelt, Dept Nursing, Odense, Denmark
[2] Odense Univ Hosp, Dept Oncol, DK-5000 Odense, Denmark
[3] Univ Southern Denmark, Inst Clin, Odense, Denmark
关键词
chronic disease; physical activity; sedentary behavior; survey research; INCREASE PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; PROGRAM; DISEASE; CARE; DETERMINANTS; MAINTENANCE;
D O I
10.1123/jpah.2015-0015
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Exercise on prescription (EOP) is an attempt to increase physical activity among sedentary adults with signs of lifestyle diseases. Until now, no studies have focused on patients with chronic diseases and how they assess the long-term effect of participating in EOP consisting of supervised interventions of different intensities. This study aimed to describe and compare self-reported physical activity in the long term among participants in 3 EOP modules of different intensities. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 1152 former participants in EOP between July 2005 and May 2007 in 2 Danish counties. Physical activity was measured as number of days with a minimum 30 minutes of moderate/vigorous activity. Results: Seventy-five percent (n = 854) returned the questionnaire. Of these, 36% reported being physically active >= 5 days/week. Comparing leisure-time activities before EOP 29% was sedentary vs. 15% (P < 0.01) after, moderate + hard leisure-time activities was 7% before vs. 19% after EOP (P < 0.01). Time postintervention did not influence the numbers reporting to be physical active negatively. Conclusions: This study in community-dwelling adults with chronic diseases participating in EOP finds that approximately one-third reported being physically active in the long term postintervention, but no differences between the modalities were found.
引用
收藏
页码:377 / 384
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   All-cause mortality associated with physical activity during leisure time, work, sports, and cycling to work [J].
Andersen, LB ;
Schnohr, P ;
Schroll, M ;
Hein, HO .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2000, 160 (11) :1621-1628
[2]  
[Anonymous], GLOB REC PHYS ACT HL
[3]  
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, How much physical activity do adults need?
[4]  
Chambers R., 2000, Health Education Journal, V59, P90, DOI [DOI 10.1177/001789690005900108, 10.1177/001789690005900108]
[5]   Meta-analysis of patient education interventions to increase physical activity among chronically ill adults [J].
Conn, Vicki S. ;
Hafdahl, Adam R. ;
Brown, Sharon A. ;
Brown, Lori M. .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2008, 70 (02) :157-172
[6]   Effects of physical exercise therapy on mobility, physical functioning, physical activity and quality of life in community-dwelling older adults with impaired mobility, physical disability and/or multi-morbidity: A meta-analysis [J].
de Vries, N. M. ;
van Ravensberg, C. D. ;
Hobbelen, J. S. M. ;
Rikkert, M. G. M. Olde ;
Staal, J. B. ;
Nijhuis-van der Sanden, M. W. G. .
AGEING RESEARCH REVIEWS, 2012, 11 (01) :136-149
[7]  
DISHMAN RK, 1985, PUBLIC HEALTH REP, V100, P158
[8]   Comparison of Self-reported versus Accelerometer-Measured Physical Activity [J].
Dyrstad, Sindre M. ;
Hansen, Bjorge H. ;
Holme, Ingar M. ;
Anderssen, Sigmund A. .
MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2014, 46 (01) :99-106
[9]  
Eakin EG, 2000, J FAM PRACTICE, V49, P158
[10]   Does primary care referral to an exercise programme increase physical activity 1 year later? A randomized controlled trial [J].
Harrison, RA ;
Roberts, C ;
Elton, PJ .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2005, 27 (01) :25-32