Risk Stratification and Shared Decision Making for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:27
作者
Schroy, Paul C., III [1 ]
Duhovic, Emir [1 ]
Chen, Clara A. [2 ]
Heeren, Timothy C. [3 ]
Lopez, William [1 ]
Apodaca, Danielle L. [1 ]
Wong, John B. [4 ]
机构
[1] Boston Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Boston, MA 02118 USA
[2] Boston Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Data Coordinating Ctr, Boston, MA USA
[3] Boston Univ, Sch Publ Hlth Boston, Dept Biostat, Boston, MA 02118 USA
[4] Tufts Med Ctr, Dept Med, Boston, MA USA
关键词
randomized trial methodology; risk stratification; provider decision making; shared decision making; AMERICAN-COLLEGE; AID;
D O I
10.1177/0272989X15625622
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. Eliciting patient preferences within the context of shared decision making has been advocated for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, yet providers often fail to comply with patient preferences that differ from their own. Purpose. To determine whether risk stratification for advanced colorectal neoplasia (ACN) influences provider willingness to comply with patient preferences when selecting a desired CRC screening option. Design. Randomized controlled trial. Setting/Participants. Asymptomatic, average-risk patients due for CRC screening in an urban safety net health care setting. Intervention. Patients were randomized 1:1 to a decision aid alone (n = 168) or decision aid plus risk assessment (n = 173) arm between September 2012 and September 2014. Outcomes. The primary outcome was concordance between patient preference and test ordered; secondary outcomes included patient satisfaction with the decision-making process, screening intentions, test completion rates, and provider satisfaction. Results. Although providers perceived risk stratification to be useful in selecting an appropriate screening test for their average-risk patients, no significant differences in concordance were observed between the decision aid alone and decision aid plus risk assessment groups (88.1% v. 85.0%, P = 0.40) or high- and low-risk groups (84.5% v. 87.1%, P = 0.51). Concordance was highest for colonoscopy and relatively low for tests other than colonoscopy, regardless of study arm or risk group. Failure to comply with patient preferences was negatively associated with satisfaction with the decision-making process, screening intentions, and test completion rates. Limitations. Single-institution setting; lack of provider education about the utility of risk stratification into their decision making. Conclusions. Providers perceived risk stratification to be useful in their decision making but often failed to comply with patient preferences for tests other than colonoscopy, even among those deemed to be at low risk of ACN.
引用
收藏
页码:526 / 535
页数:10
相关论文
共 26 条
[21]   Shared decision making about screening and chemoprevention - A suggested approach from the US Preventive Services Task Force [J].
Sheridan, SL ;
Harris, RP ;
Woolf, SH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2004, 26 (01) :56-66
[22]  
Siegel R, 2014, CA-CANCER J CLIN, V64, P104, DOI [10.3322/caac.21220, 10.3322/caac.21395]
[23]  
Stacey Dawn, 2011, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, pCD001431, DOI [10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub4, 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub5, 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub3]
[24]   Assessing prostate cancer risk: Results from the prostate cancer prevention trial [J].
Thompson, IM ;
Ankerst, DP ;
Chi, C ;
Goodman, PJ ;
Tangen, CM ;
Lucia, MS ;
Feng, ZD ;
Parnes, HL ;
Coltman, CA .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2006, 98 (08) :529-534
[25]  
Winawer Sidney J, 2002, Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am, V12, P1, DOI 10.1016/S1052-5157(03)00053-9
[26]   Informed Choice vs. No Choice in Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests: A Prospective Cohort Study in Real-Life Screening Practice [J].
Wong, Martin C. S. ;
Ching, Jessica Y. L. ;
Chan, Victor C. W. ;
Lam, Thomas Y. T. ;
Luk, Arthur K. C. ;
Ng, Siew C. ;
Ng, Simon S. M. ;
Sung, Joseph J. Y. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 109 (07) :1072-1079