An Examination of American College of Surgeons NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator Accuracy

被引:130
作者
Cohen, Mark E. [1 ]
Liu, Yaoming [1 ]
Ko, Clifford Y. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Hall, Bruce L. [1 ,4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Amer Coll Surg, Div Res & Optimal Patient Care, Chicago, IL USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Dept Surg, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[3] VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare Syst, Los Angeles, CA USA
[4] Washington Univ St Louis, Dept Surg, St Louis, MO USA
[5] Washington Univ St Louis, Ctr Hlth Policy, St Louis, MO USA
[6] Washington Univ St Louis, Olin Business Sch, St Louis, MO USA
[7] John Cochran Vet Affairs Med Ctr, St Louis, MO USA
[8] BJC Healthcare, St Louis, MO USA
关键词
PERIPROSTHETIC JOINT INFECTION; PREDICTION MODELS; 30-DAY COMPLICATIONS; EXTERNAL VALIDATION; FAIR PREDICTOR; QUALITY; RECONSTRUCTION; ADJUSTMENT; CANCER; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.12.057
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: The American College of Surgeons NSQIP offers a Surgical Risk Calculator (SRC) that provides detailed, patient-level, risk assessments for many adverse outcomes to surgeons, patients, and the general public. The SRC calculator was designed to help guide discussion and decisions by providing generally applicable (not hospital-specific) information about surgical risk using easily understood and broadly available preoperative variables. Although large, internal evaluations have shown that the SRC has good accuracy (model discrimination and calibration), external validations have been inconsistent and tend to favor a conclusion of inadequate performance. STUDY DESIGN: External studies, attempting to validate the SRC, were examined with respect to 3 design features: sample size (small samples reduce reliability), case-mix homogeneity (homogeneity reduces discrimination); and number of institutions providing data (few institutions reduces generalizability). The impact of each feature was then examined in several sets of simulation studies. RESULTS: Each of the 3 design features has the potential to act as an artifactual cause for apparent SRC predictive failure. In addition, demonstrations that SRC estimates are inferior to those from models that use additional (sometimes operation-specific) predictor variables were seen as not relevant with respect to the SRC's intended scope. CONCLUSIONS: The SRC predictive failures, reported by studies with the described design limitations, should not be misunderstood as disqualifying the SRC as an accurate and appropriate tool for its intended purpose of providing a general purpose risk calculator, applicable across many surgical domains, using easily understood and generally available predictive information. (C) 2017 by the American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
引用
收藏
页码:787 / +
页数:10
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Applying the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program risk calculator to patients undergoing colorectal surgery: theory vs reality [J].
Adegboyega, Titilayo O. ;
Borgert, Andrew J. ;
Lambert, Pamela J. ;
Jarman, Benjamin T. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2017, 213 (01) :30-35
[2]   The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Surgical Risk Calculator Does Not Accurately Predict Risk of 30-Day Complications Among Patients Undergoing Microvascular Head and Neck Reconstruction [J].
Arce, Kevin ;
Moore, Eric J. ;
Lohse, Christine M. ;
Reiland, Matthew D. ;
Yetzer, Jacob G. ;
Ettinger, Kyle S. .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2016, 74 (09) :1850-1858
[3]   The Relationship Between the C-Statistic of a Risk-adjustment Model and the Accuracy of Hospital Report Cards A Monte Carlo Study [J].
Austin, Peter C. ;
Reeves, Mathew J. .
MEDICAL CARE, 2013, 51 (03) :275-284
[4]   Development and Evaluation of the Universal ACS NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator: A Decision Aid and Informed Consent Tool for Patients and Surgeons [J].
Bilimoria, Karl Y. ;
Liu, Yaoming ;
Paruch, Jennifer L. ;
Zhou, Lynn ;
Kmiecik, Thomas E. ;
Ko, Clifford Y. ;
Cohen, Mark E. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2013, 217 (05) :833-+
[5]  
Brier G. W., 1950, MON WEATHER REV, V78, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1175/1520-0493, DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(1950)078ANDLT
[6]  
0001:VOFEITANDGT
[7]  
2.0.CO
[8]  
2]
[9]   Optimizing ACS NSQIP Modeling for Evaluation of Surgical Quality and Risk: Patient Risk Adjustment, Procedure Mix Adjustment, Shrinkage Adjustment, and Surgical Focus [J].
Cohen, Mark E. ;
Ko, Clifford Y. ;
Bilimoria, Karl Y. ;
Zhou, Lynn ;
Huffman, Kristopher ;
Wang, Xue ;
Liu, Yaoming ;
Kraemer, Kari ;
Meng, Xiangju ;
Merkow, Ryan ;
Chow, Warren ;
Matel, Brian ;
Richards, Karen ;
Hart, Amy J. ;
Dimick, Justin B. ;
Hall, Bruce L. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2013, 217 (02) :336-+
[10]   Sample size considerations for the external validation of a multivariable prognostic model: a resampling study [J].
Collins, Gary S. ;
Ogundimu, Emmanuel O. ;
Altman, Douglas G. .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2016, 35 (02) :214-226