Success and Failure in Software Engineering: A Followup Systematic Literature Review

被引:25
作者
Tamburri, Damian A. [1 ]
Palomba, Fabio [2 ]
Kazman, Rick [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Eindhoven Univ Technol, Jheronimus Acad Data Sci, NL-5612 AZ Eindhoven, Netherlands
[2] Univ Salerno, I-84084 Fisciano Sa, Italy
[3] Univ Hawaii, Honolulu, HI 96822 USA
[4] SEI CMU, Honolulu, HI 96822 USA
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
Software; Software engineering; Bibliographies; Software measurement; Systematics; Tools; Europe; Success and failure; software engineering; systematic literature reviews; ACCURACY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1109/TEM.2020.2976642
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Success and failure in software engineering are still among the least understood phenomena in the discipline. In a recent special journal issue on the topic, Mantyla et al. started discussing these topics from different angles; the authors focused their contributions on offering a general overview of both topics without deeper detail. Recognizing the importance and impact of the topic, in this article we have executed a followup, more in-depth systematic literature review with additional analyses beyond what was previously provided. These new analyses offer: a grounded-theory of success and failure factors, harvesting over 500+ factors from the literature; 14 manually validated clusters of factors that provide relevant areas for success- and failure-specific measurement and risk-analysis; a quality model composed of previously unmeasured organizational structure quantities which are germane to software product, process, and community quality. We show that the topics of success and failure deserve further study as well as further automated tool support, e.g., monitoring tools and metrics able to track the factors and patterns emerging from this article. This article provides managers with risks as well as a more fine-grained analysis of the parameters that can be appraised to anticipate the risks.
引用
收藏
页码:599 / 611
页数:13
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]  
Abbas N, 2009, THESIS U SOUTHAMPTON
[2]  
Allaho MY, 2015, LECT NOTES SOC NETW, P57, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-19003-7_4
[3]  
Amrit C., 2007, P 15 EUR C INF SYST, P334
[4]   Exploring the impact of socio-technical core-periphery structures in open source software development [J].
Amrit, Chintan ;
van Hillegersberg, Jos .
JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 25 (02) :216-229
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2001, 9126 ISOIEC
[6]   Using text clustering to predict defect resolution time: a conceptual replication and an evaluation of prediction accuracy [J].
Assar, Said ;
Borg, Markus ;
Pfahl, Dietmar .
EMPIRICAL SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 2016, 21 (04) :1437-1475
[7]  
Bellingham M, 2014, P PSYCH PROGR INT GR, P18
[8]  
Boehm B. W., 1981, Software Engineering Economics
[9]  
Borja V., 2000, International Journal of Agile Management Systems, V2, P214, DOI 10.1108/14654650010356121
[10]   A goal-based approach to the evaluation and documentation of business process re-engineering [J].
Boyd, A .
ASLIB PROCEEDINGS, 2004, 56 (05) :286-300