Human response to thermal environment and perceived air quality in an office with individually controlled convective and radiant cooling systems

被引:12
作者
Zhao, Weixin [1 ]
Kilpelainen, Simo [1 ]
Kosonen, Risto [1 ,2 ]
Jokisalo, Juha [1 ]
Lestinen, Sami [1 ]
Wu, Yuxin [3 ,4 ]
Mustakallio, Panu [5 ]
机构
[1] Aalto Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Espoo, Finland
[2] Nanjing Tech Univ, Coll Urban Construct, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] Zhejiang Sci Tech Univ, Sch Civil Engn & Architecture, Hangzhou 310018, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[4] Chongqing Univ, Joint Int Res Lab Green Bldg & Built Environm, Minist Educ, Chongqing, Peoples R China
[5] Halton Oy, Kausala, Finland
关键词
Human response; Personalized control; Micro-environment; Perceived air quality; Thermal sensation; CO2; concentration; PRODUCTIVITY LOSS; COMFORT; SENSATION; PERFORMANCE; TEMPERATURE; MOVEMENT; HEALTH; WORK; WARM;
D O I
10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107736
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study is to analyze the human response to the indoor climate with two individually controlled convective and radiant cooling systems: a low velocity unit combined with radiant panel system (LVRP) and a personalized ventilation system combined with a radiant panel system (PVRP). As a reference system without individual control, diffuse ceiling ventilation combined with a radiant panel system (DCV-RP) was also studied. In laboratory conditions, 10 males and 10 females gave subjective response to the indoor climate during various office activities. The indoor parameters and CO2 concentrations were measured. The results show that with the reference DCV-RP system, the indoor conditions were worse than with the LVRP and PVRP systems. The thermal sensation and perceived air quality with the PVRP system was better than the LVRP system. After a medium activity task, the thermal acceptability reverts faster with the PVRP than LVRP system. Both the LVRP and PVRP systems were able to create a micro-environment around the workstations and the CO2 concentrations near the workstation were slightly lower than at the exhaust grille. Compared with the PVRP system, the subjects preferred the higher airflow rate at the workstation with the LVRP system. Males preferred a higher airflow rate than females under the same conditions with both micro-environment systems. This research found that there was significant variation in the control preferences of the human subjects concerning the micro-environment, and this emphasizes the need for personalized control to ensure that all occupants are satisfied with the indoor conditions.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 54 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2007, 15251 EN
  • [2] ASHARE, 2013, 552010 ASHRAE
  • [3] BAUMAN FS, 1993, ASHRAE TRAN, V99, P733
  • [4] Performance of ductless personalized ventilation in conjunction with displacement ventilation: Physical environment and human response
    Dalewski, Mariusz
    Melikov, Arsen K.
    Vesely, Michal
    [J]. BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 81 : 354 - 364
  • [5] Numerical evaluation of indoor thermal comfort and energy saving by operating the heating panel radiator at different flow strategies
    Embaye, M.
    Al-Dadah, R. K.
    Mahmoud, S.
    [J]. ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2016, 121 : 298 - 308
  • [6] Erickson V.L, P 10 ACM IEEE INT C, P258
  • [7] Fanger P. O., 1970, Thermal comfort. Analysis and applications in environmental engineering.
  • [8] Fountain Marc., 1994, ASHRAE T, V100, P937
  • [9] Predictive controllers for thermal comfort optimization and energy savings
    Freire, Roberto Z.
    Oliveira, Gustavo H. C.
    Mendes, Nathan
    [J]. ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2008, 40 (07) : 1353 - 1365
  • [10] Preferred temperature with standing and treadmill workstations
    Gao, Siru
    Zhai, Yongchao
    Yang, Liu
    Zhang, Hui
    Gao, Yunfei
    [J]. BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 138 : 63 - 73