A fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making model for IS student group project assessment

被引:16
作者
Kwok, Ron Chi-Wai
Zhou, Duanning
Zhang, Quan
Ma, Jian
机构
[1] City Univ Hong Kong, Dept Informat Syst, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] City Univ Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
multi-criteria decision making; group decision model; multi-preference format; fuzzy set; group project assessment;
D O I
10.1007/s10726-006-9029-7
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
To accommodate the criterion-referenced student group project assessment approach, this paper proposes a fuzzy group Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) model. The proposed model can be used to solve student group project assessment problem in particular and generic MCDM problems in general, where the criteria used are often different and can be scored with multiple preference formats. The proposed fuzzy group MCDM model supports seven different preference formats, including preference ordering, utility vector, linguistic term vector, selected subset, fuzzy selected subset, fuzzy preference relation, and normal preference relation. It has been firstly used in the context of Information Systems (IS) student group project assessment.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 42
页数:18
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1992, LECT NOTES ECON M, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-46768-4_5
[2]   AN APPLICATION OF FUZZY-SETS IN STUDENTS EVALUATION [J].
BISWAS, R .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1995, 74 (02) :187-194
[3]   A multi-attribute negotiation support system with market signaling for electronic markets [J].
Bui, T ;
Yen, J ;
Hu, JR ;
Sankaran, S .
GROUP DECISION AND NEGOTIATION, 2001, 10 (06) :515-537
[4]   New methods for students' evaluation using fuzzy sets [J].
Chen, SM ;
Lee, CH .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1999, 104 (02) :209-218
[5]   A note on the reciprocity in the aggregation of fuzzy preference relations using OWA operators [J].
Chiclana, F ;
Herrera, F ;
Herrera-Viedma, E ;
Martínez, L .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2003, 137 (01) :71-83
[6]   A note on the internal consistency of various preference representations [J].
Chiclana, F ;
Herrera, F ;
Herrera-Viedma, E .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2002, 131 (01) :75-78
[7]   Integrating three representation models in fuzzy multipurpose decision making based on fuzzy preference relations [J].
Chiclana, F ;
Herrera, F ;
Herrera-Viedma, E .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1998, 97 (01) :33-48
[8]  
Dickson GW, 1996, GROUP DECIS NEGOT, V5, P51
[9]   FUZZY GRADING SYSTEM [J].
ECHAUZ, JR ;
VACHTSEVANOS, GJ .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EDUCATION, 1995, 38 (02) :158-165
[10]  
Gipps C., 1994, ASSESS EDUC, V1, P283, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594940010304, DOI 10.1080/0969594940010304]