Adaptation and validation of the Charlson Index for Read/OXMIS coded databases

被引:261
作者
Khan, Nada F. [1 ]
Perera, Rafael [1 ]
Harper, Stephen [2 ]
Rose, Peter W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Dept Primary Hlth Care, Oxford OX3 7LF, England
[2] Mill Stream Surg, Wallingford OX10 6RL, Oxon, England
关键词
CLINICAL COMORBIDITY INDEX; ADMINISTRATIVE DATABASES; CANCER SURVIVORS; CO-MORBIDITY; OUTCOMES; QUALITY; CARE;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2296-11-1
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: The Charlson comorbidity index is widely used in ICD-9 administrative data, however, there is no translation for Read/OXMIS coded data despite increasing use of the General Practice Research Database (GPRD). Our main objective was to translate the Charlson index for use with Read/OXMIS coded data such as the GPRD and test its association with mortality. We also aimed to provide a version of the comorbidity index for other researchers using similar datasets. Methods: Two clinicians translated the Charlson index into Read/OXMIS codes. We tested the association between comorbidity score and increased mortality in 146 441 patients from the GPRD using proportional hazards models. Results: This Read/OXMIS translation of the Charlson index contains 3156 codes. Our validation showed a strong positive association between Charlson score and age. Cox proportional models show a positive increasing association with mortality and Charlson score. The discrimination of the logistic regression model for mortality was good (AUC = 0.853). Conclusion: We have translated a commonly used comorbidity index into Read/OXMIS for use in UK primary care databases. The translated index showed a good discrimination in our study population. This is the first study to develop a co-morbidity index for use with the Read/OXMIS coding system and the GPRD. A copy of the comorbidity index is provided for other researchers using similar databases.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 27 条
[11]   Assessing quality using administrative data [J].
Iezzoni, LI .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1997, 127 (08) :666-674
[12]   IMPORTANCE OF CLASSIFYING INITIAL CO-MORBIDITY IN EVALUATING OUTCOME OF DIABETES-MELLITUS [J].
KAPLAN, MH ;
FEINSTEIN, AR .
JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1974, 27 (7-8) :387-404
[13]  
KHAN NF, BRIT J GEN PRACTICE
[14]  
Kirkwood B. R., 2003, ESSENTIAL MED STAT B
[15]   Development of a comorbidity index using physician claims data [J].
Klabunde, CN ;
Potosky, AL ;
Legler, JM ;
Warren, JL .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2000, 53 (12) :1258-1267
[16]  
*MHRA, 2004, GPRD REC GUID VIS US
[17]   RATING CHRONIC MEDICAL ILLNESS BURDEN IN GEROPSYCHIATRIC PRACTICE AND RESEARCH - APPLICATION OF THE CUMULATIVE ILLNESS RATING-SCALE [J].
MILLER, MD ;
PARADIS, CF ;
HOUCK, PR ;
MAZUMDAR, S ;
STACK, JA ;
RIFAI, AH ;
MULSANT, B ;
REYNOLDS, CF .
PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 1992, 41 (03) :237-248
[18]   A systematic review of the Charlson comorbidity index using Canadian administrative databases: A perspective on risk adjustment in critical care research [J].
Needham, DM ;
Scales, DC ;
Laupacis, A ;
Pronovost, PJ .
JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2005, 20 (01) :12-19
[19]   Identifying patients with a cancer diagnosis using general practice medical records and Cancer Registry data [J].
Pascoe, Shane W. ;
Neal, Richard D. ;
Heywood, Philip L. ;
Allgar, Victoria L. ;
Miles, Jeremy Nv ;
Stefoski-Mikeljevic, Jasmina .
FAMILY PRACTICE, 2008, 25 (04) :215-220
[20]   A COMPARISON OF ADMINISTRATIVE VERSUS CLINICAL-DATA - CORONARY-ARTERY BYPASS-SURGERY AS AN EXAMPLE [J].
ROMANO, PS ;
ROOS, LL ;
LUFT, HS ;
JOLLIS, JG ;
DOLISZNY, K .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1994, 47 (03) :249-260