Diagnostic performance of a SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test in a large, Norwegian cohort

被引:32
|
作者
Landaas, Elisabeth Toverud [1 ,2 ]
Storm, Margrethe Larsdatter [3 ]
Tollanes, Mette Christophersen [4 ,5 ]
Barlinn, Regine [1 ]
Kran, Anne-Marte Bakken [3 ]
Bragstad, Karoline [3 ]
Christensen, Andreas [3 ,6 ]
Andreassen, Trude [7 ]
机构
[1] Oslo Univ Hosp, Dept Microbiol, N-0424 Oslo, Norway
[2] Univ Oslo, Inst Clin Med, Oslo, Norway
[3] Norwegian Inst Publ Hlth, Div Infect Control & Environm Hlth, Oslo, Norway
[4] Haraldsplass Deaconess Hosp, Norwegian Org Qual Improvement Lab Examinat Noklu, Bergen, Norway
[5] Univ Bergen, Dept Global Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Bergen, Norway
[6] St Olavs Hosp, Dept Med Microbiol, Trondheim, Norway
[7] Norwegian Directorate Hlth, Oslo, Norway
关键词
SARS-CoV-2; Coronavirus; COVID-19; Rapid antigen test (RAT); Point-of-care test (POCT); Lateral flow assay (LFA);
D O I
10.1016/j.jcv.2021.104789
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Background: Rapid antigen tests (RATs) may be included in national strategies for handling the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, as they provide test results rapidly, are easily performed outside laboratories, and enable immediate contract tracing. However, before implementation further clinical evaluation of test sensitivity is warranted. Objectives: To examine the performance of Abbott?s PanbioTM COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device for SARS-CoV-2 testing in a low to medium prevalence setting in Norway. Study design: A prospective study comparing the results of the Panbio RAT with PCR in 4857 parallel samples collected at a SARS-CoV-2 test station in Oslo, and from COVID-19 outbreaks in six Norwegian municipalities. Results: A total of 4857 cases were included in the study; 3991 and 866 cases from the test station and the outbreak municipalities, respectively. The prevalence at the test station in Oslo was 6.3 %, and the overall sensitivity of the RAT was 74 %. Increased sensitivity was observed in patients who experienced symptoms (79 %) and when considering samples with viral loads above estimated level of infectivity (84 %), while it was lower in asymptomatic persons (55 %). In the outbreak municipalities, the overall prevalence was 6.9 %, and the total sensitivity of the RAT was 70 %. Conclusions: Our results indicate that the test correctly identified most infectious individuals. Nevertheless, the sensitivity is considerably lower than for PCR, and it is important that the limitations of the test are kept in mind in the follow-up of tested individuals.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Investigation of the diagnostic performance of the SARS-CoV-2 saliva antigen test: A meta-analysis
    Chen, Cheng-Chieh
    Hsiao, Ke-Yu
    Bai, Chyi-Huey
    Wang, Yuan-Hung
    JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY IMMUNOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2022, 55 (06) : 1084 - 1093
  • [22] Diagnostic Performance of Rapid Antigen Testing for SARS-CoV-2: The COVid-19 AntiGen (COVAG) study
    Wertenauer, Christoph
    Brenner Michael, Geovana
    Dressel, Alexander
    Pfeifer, Caroline
    Hauser, Ulrike
    Wieland, Eberhard
    Mayer, Christian
    Mutschmann, Caren
    Roskos, Martin
    Wertenauer, Hans-Joerg
    Moissl, Angela P.
    Lorkowski, Stefan
    Maerz, Winfried
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2022, 9
  • [23] Speed versus Sensitivity: Performance of SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test in the Hospital Setting
    Sharma, Apoorva
    Karade, Santosh
    Anand, Kavita Bala
    Lall, Mahima
    Sen, Sourav
    Patrikar, Seema
    Naithani, Nardeep
    JOURNAL OF MARINE MEDICAL SOCIETY, 2021, 23 (02) : 201 - 204
  • [24] Performance of the Sofia SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test in Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Pediatric Patients
    Freeman, Megan Culler
    Freeman, Tanner J.
    Iagnemma, Jennifer
    Rasmussen, Jayne
    Heidenreich, Kelly
    Wells, Alan
    Hoberman, Alejandro
    Mitchell, Stephanie L.
    JOURNAL OF THE PEDIATRIC INFECTIOUS DISEASES SOCIETY, 2022, 11 (09) : 417 - 421
  • [25] Monoclonal antibody pairs against SARS-CoV-2 for rapid antigen test development
    Salcedo, Nol
    Reddy, Ankita
    Gomez, Adam R.
    Bosch, Irene
    Herrera, Bobby Brooke
    PLOS NEGLECTED TROPICAL DISEASES, 2022, 16 (03):
  • [26] Diagnostic accuracy of a SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test in real-life clinical settings
    Jegerlehner, Sabrina
    Suter-Riniker, Franziska
    Jent, Philipp
    Bittel, Pascal
    Nagler, Michael
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2021, 109 : 118 - 122
  • [27] Diagnostic evaluation of PanbioTM antigen rapid diagnostic test for SARS-CoV-2: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Boujemaa, Safa
    Suri, Gurparsad Singh
    Kaur, Gurleen
    JOURNAL OF VIROLOGICAL METHODS, 2023, 321
  • [28] Salivary SARS-CoV-2 antigen rapid detection: A prospective cohort study
    Basso, Daniela
    Aita, Ada
    Padoan, Andrea
    Cosma, Chiara
    Navaglia, Filippo
    Moz, Stefania
    Contran, Nicole
    Zambon, Carlo-Federico
    Cattelan, Anna Maria
    Plebani, Mario
    CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2021, 517 : 54 - 59
  • [29] Performance of a SARS-CoV-2 antigen rapid immunoassay in patients admitted to the emergency department
    Leli, Christian
    Di Matteo, Luigi
    Gotta, Franca
    Cornaglia, Elisa
    Vay, Daria
    Megna, Iacopo
    Pensato, Rosalia Emanuela
    Boverio, Riccardo
    Rocchetti, Andrea
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2021, 110 : 135 - 140
  • [30] Performance of six rapid diagnostic tests for SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection and implications for practical use
    Fourati, Slim
    Langendorf, Celine
    Audureau, Etienne
    Challine, Dominique
    Michel, Justine
    Soulier, Alexandre
    Ahnou, Nazim
    Desveaux, Isaac
    Picard, Oriane
    Ortonne, Valerie
    Gourgeon, Aurelie
    Mills, Clair
    Hemery, Francois
    Rieux, Claire
    Pawlotsky, Jean-Michel
    Malou, Nada
    Chevaliez, Stephane
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY, 2021, 142