Diagnostic performance of a SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test in a large, Norwegian cohort

被引:32
|
作者
Landaas, Elisabeth Toverud [1 ,2 ]
Storm, Margrethe Larsdatter [3 ]
Tollanes, Mette Christophersen [4 ,5 ]
Barlinn, Regine [1 ]
Kran, Anne-Marte Bakken [3 ]
Bragstad, Karoline [3 ]
Christensen, Andreas [3 ,6 ]
Andreassen, Trude [7 ]
机构
[1] Oslo Univ Hosp, Dept Microbiol, N-0424 Oslo, Norway
[2] Univ Oslo, Inst Clin Med, Oslo, Norway
[3] Norwegian Inst Publ Hlth, Div Infect Control & Environm Hlth, Oslo, Norway
[4] Haraldsplass Deaconess Hosp, Norwegian Org Qual Improvement Lab Examinat Noklu, Bergen, Norway
[5] Univ Bergen, Dept Global Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Bergen, Norway
[6] St Olavs Hosp, Dept Med Microbiol, Trondheim, Norway
[7] Norwegian Directorate Hlth, Oslo, Norway
关键词
SARS-CoV-2; Coronavirus; COVID-19; Rapid antigen test (RAT); Point-of-care test (POCT); Lateral flow assay (LFA);
D O I
10.1016/j.jcv.2021.104789
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Background: Rapid antigen tests (RATs) may be included in national strategies for handling the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, as they provide test results rapidly, are easily performed outside laboratories, and enable immediate contract tracing. However, before implementation further clinical evaluation of test sensitivity is warranted. Objectives: To examine the performance of Abbott?s PanbioTM COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device for SARS-CoV-2 testing in a low to medium prevalence setting in Norway. Study design: A prospective study comparing the results of the Panbio RAT with PCR in 4857 parallel samples collected at a SARS-CoV-2 test station in Oslo, and from COVID-19 outbreaks in six Norwegian municipalities. Results: A total of 4857 cases were included in the study; 3991 and 866 cases from the test station and the outbreak municipalities, respectively. The prevalence at the test station in Oslo was 6.3 %, and the overall sensitivity of the RAT was 74 %. Increased sensitivity was observed in patients who experienced symptoms (79 %) and when considering samples with viral loads above estimated level of infectivity (84 %), while it was lower in asymptomatic persons (55 %). In the outbreak municipalities, the overall prevalence was 6.9 %, and the total sensitivity of the RAT was 70 %. Conclusions: Our results indicate that the test correctly identified most infectious individuals. Nevertheless, the sensitivity is considerably lower than for PCR, and it is important that the limitations of the test are kept in mind in the follow-up of tested individuals.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Evaluation of the Diagnostic Performance of a SARS-CoV-2 and Influenza A/B Combo Rapid Antigen Test in Respiratory Samples
    Dinc, Harika Oykue
    Karabulut, Nuran
    Alacam, Sema
    Uysal, Hayriye Kirkoyun
    Dasdemir, Ferhat Osman
    Onel, Mustafa
    Tuyji Tok, Yesim
    Sirekbasan, Serhat
    Agacfidan, Ali
    Gareayaghi, Nesrin
    cakan, Huseyin
    Eryigit, Onder Yuksel
    Kocazeybek, Bekir
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2023, 13 (05)
  • [12] Performance of a Point-of-Care Test for the Rapid Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Antigen
    Stroemer, Annabelle
    Rose, Ruben
    Schaefer, Miriam
    Schoen, Frieda
    Vollersen, Anna
    Lorentz, Thomas
    Fickenscher, Helmut
    Krumbholz, Andi
    MICROORGANISMS, 2021, 9 (01) : 1 - 11
  • [13] Evaluation of the AMP SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test in a hospital setting
    Leixner, Georg
    Voill-Glaninger, Astrid
    Bonner, Elisabeth
    Kreil, Anna
    Zadnikar, Rene
    Viveiros, Andre
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2021, 108 : 353 - 356
  • [14] Evaluation of an Antigen Detection Rapid Diagnostic Test for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Clinical Samples
    Lam, Athene Hoi-Ying
    Leung, Ka-Yi
    Zhang, Ruiqi
    Liu, Danlei
    Fan, Yujing
    Tam, Anthony Raymond
    Yip, Cyril Chik-Yan
    Cheng, Vincent Chi-Chung
    Yuen, Kwok-Yung
    Hung, Ivan Fan-Ngai
    Chan, Kwok-Hung
    COVID, 2021, 1 (04): : 775 - 783
  • [15] Diagnostic performance of CerTest and Panbio antigen rapid diagnostic tests to diagnose SARS-CoV-2 infection
    Perez-Garcia, Felipe
    Romanyk, Juan
    Gomez-Herruz, Pena
    Arroyo, Teresa
    Perez-Tanoira, Ramon
    Linares, Manuel
    Perez Ranz, Ines
    Labrador Ballestero, Andrea
    Moya Gutierrez, Helena
    Jesus Ruiz-Alvarez, Ma
    Cuadros-Gonzalez, Juan
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY, 2021, 137
  • [16] Reliability of the rapid antigen test for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 in Tunisia
    Chtourou, Amel
    Gargouri, Saba
    Nasri, Abdennour
    Taktak, Awatef
    Smaoui, Fahmi
    Chakroun, Olfa
    Rekik, Noureddine
    Hammami, Adnene
    Feki-Berrajah, Lamia
    Karray, Hela
    EASTERN MEDITERRANEAN HEALTH JOURNAL, 2024, 30 (04) : 300 - 303
  • [17] SARS-CoV-2 antigen rapid tests For reliable detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection not suitable
    Reuter, Tom
    Lange, Constanze
    Zeyher, Sharay
    Woelk, Benno
    Kramer, Jan
    PRAVENTION UND GESUNDHEITSFORDERUNG, 2023, 18 (03): : 370 - 376
  • [18] Evaluation of rapid antigen test for detection of SARS-CoV-2 virus
    Mak, Gannon C. K.
    Cheng, Peter K. C.
    Lau, Stephen S. Y.
    Wong, Kitty K. Y.
    Lau, C. S.
    Lam, Edman T. K.
    Chan, Rickjason C. W.
    Tsang, Dominic N. C.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY, 2020, 129
  • [19] Clinical assessment of the Roche SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test
    Salvagno, Gian Luca
    Gianfilippi, Gianluca
    Bragantini, Damiano
    Henry, Brandon M.
    Lippi, Giuseppe
    DIAGNOSIS, 2021, 8 (03) : 322 - 326
  • [20] Comparison of the SARS-CoV-2 Rapid antigen test to the real star Sars-CoV-2 RT PCR kit
    Kruettgen, Alexander
    Cornelissen, Christian G.
    Dreher, Michael
    Hornef, Mathias W.
    Imoehl, Matthias
    Kleines, Michael
    JOURNAL OF VIROLOGICAL METHODS, 2021, 288