Retest Reliability of Integrated Speed-Accuracy Measures

被引：15

作者：

Bakun Emesh, Tamar ^{[1
]}

Garbi, Dror ^{[1
]}

Kaplan, Alon ^{[1
]}

Zelicha, Hila ^{[1
]}

Yaskolka Meir, Anat ^{[1
]}

Tsaban, Gal ^{[1
,2
]}

Rinott, Ehud ^{[1
]}

Meiran, Nachshon ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Ben Gurion Univ Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel

[2] Soroka Univ, Med Ctr, Beer Sheva, Israel

来源：

ASSESSMENT | 2022年 / 29卷 / 04期

关键词：

retest reliability; cognitive tasks; individual differences; executive functions; speed– accuracy integration; REACTION-TIME; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; EXECUTIVE FUNCTIONS; WORKING-MEMORY; COMBINING SPEED; TASKS; PERSONALITY;

D O I：

10.1177/1073191120985609

中图分类号：

B849 [应用心理学];

学科分类号：

040203 ;

摘要：

Cognitive tasks borrowed from experimental psychology are often used to assess individual differences. A cardinal issue of this transition from experimental to correlational designs is reduced retest reliability of some well-established cognitive effects as well as speed-accuracy trade-off. The present study aimed to address these issues by examining the retest reliability of various methods for speed-accuracy integration and by comparing between two types of task modeling: difference scores and residual scores. Results from three studies on executive functions show that (a) integrated speed-accuracy scoring is generally more reliable as compared with nonintegrated methods: mean response time and accuracy; and (b) task modeling, especially residual scores, reduced reliability. We thus recommend integrating speed and accuracy, at least for measuring executive functions.

引用

页码：717 / 730

页数：14

共 53 条

[1]

Bruyer R., 2011, PSYCHOL BELGICA, V51, P5, DOI [10.5334/pb-51-1-5, DOI 10.5334/PB-51-1-5]

[2]

Brysbaert M., 2019, J COGNITION, V2, P1, DOI [10.5334/joc.72, DOI 10.5334/JOC.72]

[3]

Canty A. J., 2002, R NEWS, V2, P2, DOI DOI 10.1159/000323281

[4] A comparison of the reliabilities of four types of difference scores for five cognitive assessment batteries [J].