The rise times of high- and low-redshift Type Ia supernovae are consistent

We present a self-consistent comparison of the rise times for low- and high-redshift Type Ia supernovae. Following previous studies, the early light curve is modeled using a t(2) law, which is then mated with a modified Leibundgut template light curve. The best-fit t(2) law is determined for ensemble samples of low- and high-redshift supernovae by fitting simultaneously for all light-curve parameters for all supernovae in each sample. Our method fully accounts for the nonnegligible covariance among the lightcurve fitting parameters, which previous analyses have neglected. Contrary to recent results by Riess et al., we find fair to good agreement between the rise times of the low- and high-redshift Type Ia supernovae. The uncertainty in the rise time of the high-redshift Type Ia supernovae is presently quite large (roughly +/-1.2 days statistical), making any search for evidence of evolution based on a comparison of rise times premature. Furthermore, systematic effects on rise-time determinations from the high-redshift observations, due to the form of the late-time light curve and the manner in which the light curves of these supernovae were sampled, can bias the high-redshift rise-time determinations by up to (+3.6)(-1.9) days under extreme situations. The peak brightnesses-used for cosmology-do not suffer any significant bias, nor any significant increase in uncertainty.