Assessment of Genetic Relationship among Male and Female Fig Genotypes Using Simple Sequence Repeat (SSR) Markers

被引:7
|
作者
Teoman, Sevin [1 ]
Ipek, Meryem [1 ]
Erturk, Umran [1 ]
Aktepe Tangu, Nesrin [2 ]
Durgut, Erdem [3 ]
Barut, Erdogan [1 ]
Ercisli, Sezai [4 ]
Ipek, Ahmet [1 ]
机构
[1] Uludag Univ, Fac Agr, Dept Hort, Bursa, Turkey
[2] Ataturk Hort Cent Res Inst, Bursa, Turkey
[3] Bursa Directorate Prov Food Agr & Livestock, Bursa, Turkey
[4] Univ Ataturk, Dept Hort, Fac Agr, Erzurum, Turkey
关键词
caprifig; Ficus carica L; genetic variation; SSR marker; STRUCTURE analysis; FICUS-CARICA L; COMMON FIG; MICROSATELLITE MARKERS; DIVERSITY; IDENTIFICATION; CULTIVARS; GERMPLASM; FRUIT; RAPD; DIFFERENTIATION;
D O I
10.15835/nbha45110756
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Fig (Ficus carica L.) is a traditional crop in Turkey and widely cultivated around the Mediterranean areas. The gynodioecious fig species is present in two sexual forms, i.e. the domesticated fig (female tree) and the caprifig (male tree). Caprifigs are crucial for high quality fig production and breeding while, the studies on assessment of genetic relationship among caprifigs is limited. The aim of this study was to determine genetic diversity among 45 caprifigs and 2 female figs collected from four provinces in Marmara and Aegean Sea Regions of Turkey using simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers. In this work, 24 SSR markers were tested, one was monomorphic and the remaining markers amplified 82 alleles. The number of polymorphic alleles per SSR marker ranged from 2 to 7. The observed heterozygosity (Ho) differed from 0.18 to 0.76 and expected heterozygosity (He) ranged between 0.24 and 0.81. The polymorphism information content (PIC) varied from 0.42 to 0.98. A UPGMA analysis based on Dice similarity matrix clustered fig genotypes into two main groups and similarly, STRUCTURE analysis placed fig genotypes into two different gene pools (K=2). Fig genotypes collected from the same region were not clustered together in a group indicating that the fig genotypes did not cluster on the basis of their collection sites. Our results demonstrated that caprifigs and female figs are not genetically distinct and they clustered together in a group. All fig genotypes had distinct SSR marker profiles suggesting that there were no synonyms or homonyms. These results revealed a high genetic variation among fig genotypes and 23 SSR markers were enough to discriminate all fig genotypes analysed in this study demonstrating that SSR marker system is suitable for genetic analysis in figs.
引用
收藏
页码:172 / 178
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Characterization of the genetic diversity of Citrus species of Nepal using simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers
    Munankarmi, Nabin Narayan
    Rana, Neesha
    Joshi, Bal Krishna
    Bhattarai, Tribikram
    Chaudhary, Sujan
    Baral, Bikash
    Shrestha, Sangita
    SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2023, 156 : 192 - 201
  • [22] Study on genetic diversity in Pakistani wheat varieties using simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers
    Zeb, Bahadar
    Khan, Imtiaz Ahmad
    Ali, Shahid
    Bacha, Sardar
    Mumtaz, Saqib
    Swati, Zahoor Ahmed
    AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2009, 8 (17): : 4016 - 4019
  • [23] Genetic diversity of Dendrobium species revealed by simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers
    Reddy, D. Mahesh
    Momin, Kalkame Ch.
    Singh, Amit Kumar
    Kumar, Sunil
    Wangchu, L.
    Bhargav, V.
    GENETIC RESOURCES AND CROP EVOLUTION, 2024, 71 (04) : 1453 - 1464
  • [24] GENETIC DISSIMILARITY IN Conyza sumatrensis REVEALED BY SIMPLE SEQUENCE REPEAT (SSR) MARKERS
    Schneider, T.
    Rizzardi, M. A.
    Brammer, S. P.
    Scheffer-Basso, S. M.
    Nunes, A. L.
    PLANTA DANINHA, 2020, 38
  • [25] Genetic diversity of Dendrobium species revealed by simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers
    D. Mahesh Reddy
    Kalkame Ch. Momin
    Amit Kumar Singh
    Sunil Kumar
    L. Wangchu
    V. Bhargav
    Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 2024, 71 : 1453 - 1464
  • [26] Determination of genetic diversity among the fig (Ficus carica L.) genotypes using AFLP and SSR markers
    Yilmaz, Y.
    Ikten, H.
    IV BALKAN SYMPOSIUM ON FRUIT GROWING, 2020, 1289 : 281 - 289
  • [27] Characterization of citrus germplasm using simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers
    Singh, A. K.
    Sinha, Pallavi
    Dubey, A. K.
    Srivastav, Manish
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF GENETICS AND PLANT BREEDING, 2011, 71 (04) : 349 - 355
  • [28] Genetic diversity analysis of Bt cotton genotypes in Pakistan using simple sequence repeat markers
    Ullah, I.
    Iram, A.
    Iqbal, M. Z.
    Nawaz, M.
    Hasni, S. M.
    Jamil, S.
    GENETICS AND MOLECULAR RESEARCH, 2012, 11 (01): : 597 - 605
  • [29] Assessment of genetic diversity among some Iranian hazelnut genotypes using SSR markers
    Erfatpour, M.
    Hamidogli, Y.
    Fatahi, R.
    Falahati, M.
    Javadi, D.
    Hashemabadi, D.
    Kaviani, B.
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF CROP SCIENCE, 2011, 5 (10) : 1286 - 1291
  • [30] ASSESSMENT OF GENETIC DIVERSITY AMONG KIDNEY BEAN (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) CULTIVARS USING EST-SIMPLE SEQUENCE REPEAT (SSR) MARKERS
    Parmar, Subhash Chand
    Thakur, Nirja
    Nath, Amarjit K.
    APPLIED BIOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2018, 20 (02) : 163 - 170