Groups of encased stone columns: Influence of column length and arrangement

被引:68
作者
Castro, Jorge [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cantabria, Dept Ground Engn & Mat Sci, Grp Geotech Engn, Avda Los Castros S-N, E-39005 Santander, Spain
关键词
Geosynthetics; Encased stone columns; Numerical analyses; Settlement; Footings; Critical length; MODEL TESTS; PERFORMANCE; FOUNDATIONS; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.geotexmem.2016.12.001
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
This paper presents a set of systematic 2D and 3D finite element analyses that study the performance of groups of encased stone columns beneath a rigid footing. Those numerical analyses show that, if the area replacement ratio, i.e. area of the columns over area of the footing, and the ratio of encasement stiffness to column diameter are kept constant, the column arrangement (both number of columns and column position) has a small influence on the settlement reduction achieved with the treatment. For high encasement stiffnesses, placing the column near the footing edges may be slightly more beneficial reducing the settlement; on the contrary, the maximum hoop force at the encasement is notably higher. Based on the minor influence of column arrangement, this paper proposes a new simplified approach to study groups of encased stone columns, which involves converting all the columns of the group beneath the footing in just one central column with an equivalent area and encasement stiffness. This simplified model is used to conclude that, for settlement reduction and fully encased columns in a homogeneous soil, there is a column critical length of around two or three times the footing width. The critical length of the encasement for partially encased columns is slightly lower than that of the fully encased columns. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:68 / 80
页数:13
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
Alexiew D., 2015, Ground improvement case histories: Embankments with special reference to consolidation and other physical methods, P451
[2]   Model tests on single and groups of stone columns with different geosynthetic reinforcement arrangement [J].
Ali, K. ;
Shahu, J. T. ;
Sharma, K. G. .
GEOSYNTHETICS INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 21 (02) :103-118
[3]   Model tests on geosynthetic-reinforced stone columns: a comparative study [J].
Ali, K. ;
Shahu, J. T. ;
Sharma, K. G. .
GEOSYNTHETICS INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 19 (04) :292-305
[4]   Behavior of Geotextile-Encased Granular Columns Supporting Test Embankment on Soft Deposit [J].
Almeida, Marcio S. S. ;
Hosseinpour, Iman ;
Riccio, Mario ;
Alexiew, Dimiter .
JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2015, 141 (03)
[5]  
Barksdale R.D., 1983, Design and Construction of Stone Columns, VI.
[6]   The settlement performance of stone column foundations [J].
Black, J. A. ;
Sivakumar, V. ;
Bell, A. .
GEOTECHNIQUE, 2011, 61 (11) :909-922
[7]  
Brinkgreve Kumarswamy, 2015, PLAXIS 2D 2015 MANUA
[8]  
Brinkgreve R.B.J., 2013, Plaxis 3D 2013 Manual
[9]  
Castro J., 2013, P 18 INT C SOIL MECH, V3, P2445
[10]   Discussion of “Column Supported Embankments with Geosynthetic Encased Columns: Validity of the Unit Cell Concept” [Geotechnical and Geological Engineering 33 (2015) 425–442] [J].
Castro J. .
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 2016, 34 (01) :419-420