Profiling ecosystem vulnerability to invasion by zebra mussels with support vector machines

被引:21
作者
Drake, John M. [1 ]
Bossenbroek, Jonathan M. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Georgia, Odum Sch Ecol, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[2] Univ Toledo, Dept Environm Sci, Toledo, OH 43606 USA
[3] Univ Toledo, Lake Erie Ctr, Toledo, OH 43606 USA
关键词
Invasive species; Niche; Support vector machines; Zebra mussels; DREISSENA-POLYMORPHA; SPECIES DISTRIBUTIONS; DENSITY-DEPENDENCE; NICHE; REGRESSION; DISPERSAL; EVOLUTION; ABSENCE; MODELS; COMMUNITIES;
D O I
10.1007/s12080-009-0050-8
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Decades since the initial establishment of zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha) in North America, understanding and controlling the invasion of aquatic ecosystems continues to be a problem in continent-wide conservation and landscape management. While the high economic and conservation burden of this species makes accurate predictions of future invasions a research priority, forecasting is confounded by limited data, tenuous model assumptions, and the stochasticity of the invasion process. Using a new method for niche identification, we profiled invasion vulnerability for 1,017 lakes in the Great Lakes region of the Unites States. We used a nonparametric geoadditive regression model to test for effects of two water quality variables on the present distribution of zebra mussels. We then used the support vector data description (SVDD), a support vector machine for one-class classification, to estimate the boundary of the ecological niche. By disentangling niche estimation from distributional assumptions, computational niche models could be used to test an array of fundamental concepts in ecology and evolution, while species invasions forecasting is representative of the wide range of potential applications for niche identification in conservation and management.
引用
收藏
页码:189 / 198
页数:10
相关论文
共 78 条
[1]   Evaluating predictive models of species' distributions: criteria for selecting optimal models [J].
Anderson, RP ;
Lew, D ;
Peterson, AT .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2003, 162 (03) :211-232
[2]  
[Anonymous], DDTOOLS DATA DESCRIP
[3]  
Bossenbroek J.M., 2009, Bioeconomics of Invasive Species: Integrating Ecology, Economics, and Management, P244
[4]  
Bossenbroek JM, 2001, ECOL APPL, V11, P1778, DOI 10.1890/1051-0761(2001)011[1778:POLDDU]2.0.CO
[5]  
2
[6]   Can ecologists heat up the discussion on invasive species risk? [J].
Bossenbroek, JM ;
McNulty, J ;
Keller, RP .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2005, 25 (06) :1595-1597
[7]   Presence-absence versus presence-only modelling methods for predicting bird habitat suitability [J].
Brotons, L ;
Thuiller, W ;
Araújo, MB ;
Hirzel, AH .
ECOGRAPHY, 2004, 27 (04) :437-448
[8]  
Chase JM., 2009, Ecological niches: linking classical and contemporary approaches
[9]   Ecological forecasts: An emerging imperative [J].
Clark, JS ;
Carpenter, SR ;
Barber, M ;
Collins, S ;
Dobson, A ;
Foley, JA ;
Lodge, DM ;
Pascual, M ;
Pielke, R ;
Pizer, W ;
Pringle, C ;
Reid, WV ;
Rose, KA ;
Sala, O ;
Schlesinger, WH ;
Wall, DH ;
Wear, D .
SCIENCE, 2001, 293 (5530) :657-660
[10]  
Drake JM, 2004, BIOSCIENCE, V54, P931, DOI 10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0931:TPDOZM]2.0.CO