Effects of numerical and graphical displays on professed risk-taking behavior

被引:122
作者
Stone, ER
Yates, JF
Parker, AM
机构
[1] UNIV MICHIGAN, DEPT PSYCHOL, ANN ARBOR, MI 48109 USA
[2] CARNEGIE MELLON UNIV, DEPT SOCIAL & DECIS SCI, PITTSBURGH, PA 15213 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1037/1076-898X.3.4.243
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
In 3 experiments, the authors examined alternative formats for displaying low-probability risk information and the effects of these formats on professed risk-taking behavior. In Experiment 1, participants who were presented with numerically displayed risk information stated that they would be willing to pay less money to reduce a risk than were participants given the identical information by means of stick figures. Experiments 2 and 3 evaluated 3 potential explanations for this finding by including additional formats where the risk information was displayed as asterisks, bar graphs, or faces. The data did not support explanations focusing on the discrete character of stick figures or their possible humanizing nature but instead suggested that the graphical nature of stick figures increased risk avoidance. These results suggest that depicting risk information graphically as opposed to numerically is a potentially useful technique for decreasing risk-taking behavior.
引用
收藏
页码:243 / 256
页数:14
相关论文
共 30 条
[21]   ACCIDENT PROBABILITIES AND SEAT-BELT USAGE - PSYCHOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE [J].
SLOVIC, P ;
FISCHHOFF, B ;
LICHTENSTEIN, S .
ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 1978, 10 (04) :281-285
[22]  
Slovic Paul, 1982, NEW DIRECTIONS METHO, V11, P21
[23]   DISPLAYING PROPORTIONS AND PERCENTAGES [J].
SPENCE, I ;
LEWANDOWSKY, S .
APPLIED COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 5 (01) :61-77
[24]   RISK COMMUNICATION - ABSOLUTE VERSUS RELATIVE EXPRESSIONS OF LOW-PROBABILITY RISKS [J].
STONE, ER ;
YATES, JF ;
PARKER, AM .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1994, 60 (03) :387-408
[25]   THE FRAMING OF DECISIONS AND THE PSYCHOLOGY OF CHOICE [J].
TVERSKY, A ;
KAHNEMAN, D .
SCIENCE, 1981, 211 (4481) :453-458
[26]  
VISCUSI W, 1987, LEARNING RISK
[27]   SOME CRITERIA FOR EVALUATING RISK MESSAGES [J].
WEINSTEIN, ND ;
SANDMAN, PM .
RISK ANALYSIS, 1993, 13 (01) :103-114
[28]  
Yates J. F., 1992, RISK TAKING BEHAV
[29]   CONTINGENCY JUDGMENT - PRIMACY EFFECTS AND ATTENTION DECREMENT [J].
YATES, JF ;
CURLEY, SP .
ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 1986, 62 (03) :293-302
[30]  
1991, US TODAY 1024, pA1