Effects of numerical and graphical displays on professed risk-taking behavior

被引:122
作者
Stone, ER
Yates, JF
Parker, AM
机构
[1] UNIV MICHIGAN, DEPT PSYCHOL, ANN ARBOR, MI 48109 USA
[2] CARNEGIE MELLON UNIV, DEPT SOCIAL & DECIS SCI, PITTSBURGH, PA 15213 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1037/1076-898X.3.4.243
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
In 3 experiments, the authors examined alternative formats for displaying low-probability risk information and the effects of these formats on professed risk-taking behavior. In Experiment 1, participants who were presented with numerically displayed risk information stated that they would be willing to pay less money to reduce a risk than were participants given the identical information by means of stick figures. Experiments 2 and 3 evaluated 3 potential explanations for this finding by including additional formats where the risk information was displayed as asterisks, bar graphs, or faces. The data did not support explanations focusing on the discrete character of stick figures or their possible humanizing nature but instead suggested that the graphical nature of stick figures increased risk avoidance. These results suggest that depicting risk information graphically as opposed to numerically is a potentially useful technique for decreasing risk-taking behavior.
引用
收藏
页码:243 / 256
页数:14
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   EVALUATING PERIODONTAL STATUS OF US EMPLOYED ADULTS [J].
BROWN, LJ ;
OLIVER, RC ;
LOE, H .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 1990, 121 (02) :226-232
[2]   DECISION-PROCESSES FOR LOW PROBABILITY EVENTS - POLICY IMPLICATIONS [J].
CAMERER, CF ;
KUNREUTHER, H .
JOURNAL OF POLICY ANALYSIS AND MANAGEMENT, 1989, 8 (04) :565-592
[3]   GRAPHICAL PERCEPTION - THEORY, EXPERIMENTATION, AND APPLICATION TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF GRAPHICAL METHODS [J].
CLEVELAND, WS ;
MCGILL, R .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1984, 79 (387) :531-554
[4]  
Covello V.T., 1988, RISK COMMUNICATION R
[5]  
Covello V. T., 1986, RISK ABSTR, V3, P171
[6]   COMMUNICATING RISK UNDER TITLE-III OF SARA - STRATEGIES FOR EXPLAINING VERY SMALL RISKS IN A COMMUNITY CONTEXT [J].
FISHER, A ;
MCCLELLAND, GH ;
SCHULZE, WD .
JAPCA-THE JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 1989, 39 (03) :271-276
[7]   RISK COMMUNICATION CHALLENGES [J].
FISHER, A .
RISK ANALYSIS, 1991, 11 (02) :173-179
[8]   EVALUATING RISK COMMUNICATION - NARRATIVE VS TECHNICAL PRESENTATIONS OF INFORMATION ABOUT RADON [J].
GOLDING, D ;
KRIMSKY, S ;
PLOUGH, A .
RISK ANALYSIS, 1992, 12 (01) :27-35
[9]   USING STATISTICAL RISK INFORMATION TO ASSESS ORAL-CONTRACEPTIVE SAFETY [J].
HALPERN, DF ;
BLACKMAN, S ;
SALZMAN, B .
APPLIED COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1989, 3 (03) :251-260
[10]   ORDER EFFECTS IN BELIEF UPDATING - THE BELIEF-ADJUSTMENT MODEL [J].
HOGARTH, RM ;
EINHORN, HJ .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 24 (01) :1-55