Peer Learning Through Multi-Institutional Case Conferences: Abdominal and Cardiothoracic Radiology Experience

被引:15
作者
Chow, Ryan A. [1 ]
Tan, Nelly [2 ]
Henry, Travis S. [3 ]
Kanne, Jeffrey P. [4 ]
Sekhar, Aarti [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Riverside, Riverside Sch Med, Riverside, CA 92521 USA
[2] Loma Linda Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, 11234 Anderson St, Loma Linda, CA 92354 USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Radiol & Biomed Imaging, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[4] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Med & Publ Hlth, Dept Radiol, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[5] Emory Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
关键词
Peer learning; SOCIAL MEDIA; HEALTH-CARE; PHYSICIANS; FEEDBACK; SHARE;
D O I
10.1016/j.acra.2020.01.015
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Rationale and Objectives: We describe a model of multi-institutional, multisociety, online case conferences that is a case-based group discussion of selected (nonrandom) cases which are subsequently hosted on social media and online platforms (e.g., YouTube, websites) to be available for a wider audience. Materials and Methods: Using online conferencing software (Zoom, GoToMeeting), participants from both abdominal and cardiothoracic radiologists engage in separate, subspecialty one-hour meetings discussing a variety of meaningful cases. Participants take turns presenting their cases to the group and discuss significant findings, interpretations, differential diagnoses, and any other teaching points. All of the case conferences for both societies are recorded and edited to be uploaded on YouTube and their respective websites. Results: Participants from these conferences log in from 14 institutions in 7 states across the United States. The YouTube videos reach thousands of people around the world. The abdominal case conference on YouTube has received almost 1,300 views with 90 videos uploaded. The thoracic (the Society of Thoracic Radiology) case conference has been running for over 7 years, with 226 videos uploaded to YouTube and 38,200 views, 1426 subscribers, and a total watch time of over 525,800 minutes. Twitter has been utilized by both groups to promote online viewership. Conclusion: Our model is feasible and effective compared to traditional peer review. The cases selected are deliberate and focused on quality improvement and/or education. We harness online engagement, specifically social media presence, which has opened new opportunities to educate our peers and reach a global audience, including the nonradiologic community, to learn about radiology and unique practices.
引用
收藏
页码:255 / 260
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   RADPEER Peer Review: Relevance, Use, Concerns, Challenges, and Direction Forward [J].
Abujudeh, Hani ;
Pyatt, Robert S., Jr. ;
Bruno, Michael A. ;
Chetlen, Alison L. ;
Buck, David ;
Hobbs, Susan K. ;
Roth, Christopher ;
Truwit, Charles ;
Agarwal, Rajan ;
Kennedy, Scott T. O. ;
Glenn, Lucille .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2014, 11 (09) :899-904
[2]  
Balogh EP, 2015, IMPROVING DIAGNOSIS IN HEALTH CARE, P1, DOI 10.17226/21794
[3]   Comparative Accuracy of Diagnosis by Collective Intelligence of Multiple Physicians vs Individual Physicians [J].
Barnett, Michael L. ;
Boddupalli, Dhruv ;
Nundy, Shantanu ;
Bates, David W. .
JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2019, 2 (03) :e190096
[4]   How do physicians behave when they participate in audit and feedback activities in a group with their peers? [J].
Cooke, Lara J. ;
Duncan, Diane ;
Rivera, Laura ;
Dowling, Shawn K. ;
Symonds, Christopher ;
Armson, Heather .
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2018, 13
[5]   Transition From Peer Review to Peer Learning: Experience in a Radiology Department [J].
Donnelly, Lane F. ;
Dorfman, Scott R. ;
Jones, Jeremy ;
Bisset, George S., III .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2018, 15 (08) :1143-1149
[6]   Practical Suggestions on How to Move From Peer Review to Peer Learning [J].
Donnelly, Lane F. ;
Larson, David B. ;
Heller, Richard E., III ;
Kruskal, Jonathan B. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2018, 210 (03) :578-582
[7]   Peer Review: A Better Way [J].
Eisenberg, Ronald L. .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2016, 23 (09) :1071-1072
[8]   Survey of Faculty Perceptions Regarding a Peer Review System [J].
Eisenberg, Ronald L. ;
Cunningham, Meredith L. ;
Siewert, Bettina ;
Kruskal, Jonathan B. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2014, 11 (04) :397-401
[9]   Reducing errors made by emergency physicians in interpreting radiographs: longitudinal study [J].
Espinosa, JA ;
Nolan, TW .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 320 (7237) :737-740
[10]   Social Media in Radiology: Early Trends in Twitter Microblogging at Radiology's Largest International Meeting [J].
Hawkins, C. Matthew ;
Duszak, Richard ;
Rawson, James V. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2014, 11 (04) :387-390