Comparison of midwifery care to medical care in hospitals in the Quebec pilot projects study:: Clinical indicators

被引:14
作者
Fraser, W
Hatem-Asmar, M
Krauss, I
Maillard, F
Bréart, G
Blais, R
机构
[1] CHUQ, Unite Essais Clin, Quebec City, PQ G1L 3L5, Canada
[2] Univ Laval, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Quebec City, PQ G1K 7P4, Canada
[3] Univ Montreal, Hop St Justine, Ctr Rech, Montreal, PQ H3T 1C5, Canada
[4] INSERM, U149, Paris, France
[5] Univ Montreal, Grp Rech Interdisciplinaire Sante, Montreal, PQ, Canada
来源
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH-REVUE CANADIENNE DE SANTE PUBLIQUE | 2000年 / 91卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.1007/BF03404260
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to compare indicators of process and outcome of midwifery services provided in the Quebec pilot projects to those associated with standard hospital-based medical services, Women receiving each type of care (961 per group) were matched on the basis of socio-demographic characteristics and level of obstetrical risk. We found midwifery care to be associated with less obstetrical intervention and a reduction in selected indicators of maternal morbidity (caesarean section and severe perineal injury). For neonatal outcome indicators, midwifery care was associated with benefits and risks: fewer babies with preterm birth and low birthweight, but a trend toward a higher stillbirth ratio and more frequent requirement for neonatal resuscitation. The study design does not permit to conclude that the associations were causal in nature. However, the high stillbirth rate observed in the group of women who were selected for midwife care raises concerns both regarding the appropriateness of the screening procedures for admission to such care and regarding quality of care itself.
引用
收藏
页码:I5 / I11
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   BIRTH SETTING FOR LOW-RISK PREGNANCIES - AN ANALYSIS OF THE CURRENT LITERATURE [J].
ALBERS, LL ;
KATZ, VL .
JOURNAL OF NURSE-MIDWIFERY, 1991, 36 (04) :215-220
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1985, LANCET, V2, P436
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Clinical trials: a practical approach
[4]   Evaluation of the midwifery pilot projects in Quebec: An overview [J].
Blais, R ;
Joubert, P .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH-REVUE CANADIENNE DE SANTE PUBLIQUE, 2000, 91 (01) :I1-I4
[5]   RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF ANTENATAL SOCIAL SUPPORT TO PREVENT PRETERM BIRTH [J].
BRYCE, RL ;
STANLEY, FJ ;
GARNER, JB .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1991, 98 (10) :1001-1008
[6]  
CAMPBELL R, 1994, WHERE BE BORN
[7]   Integration of midwives into the Quebec health care system [J].
Collin, J ;
Blais, R ;
White, D ;
Demers, A ;
Desbiens, F .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH-REVUE CANADIENNE DE SANTE PUBLIQUE, 2000, 91 (01) :I16-I20
[8]  
*CONS EV TECHN SAN, 1999, MORT CADR PROJ PIL P
[9]  
COOPLAND AT, 1977, CAN MED ASSOC J, V116, P999
[10]   EFFECT OF PRENATAL ULTRASOUND SCREENING ON PERINATAL OUTCOME [J].
EWIGMAN, BG ;
CRANE, JP ;
FRIGOLETTO, FD ;
LEFEVRE, ML ;
BAIN, RP ;
MCNELLIS, D .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1993, 329 (12) :821-827