Low health literacy is associated with higher risk of type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional study in Germany

被引:21
作者
Tajdar, Daniel [1 ]
Luehmann, Dagmar [1 ]
Fertmann, Regina [2 ]
Steinberg, Tim [1 ]
van den Bussche, Hendrik [1 ]
Scherer, Martin [1 ]
Schaefer, Ingmar [1 ]
机构
[1] Hamburg Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Primary Care, Hamburg, Germany
[2] Hamburg Author Hlth & Consumer Protect, Hamburg, Germany
关键词
Type; 2; diabetes; Prevention; Diabetes risk; Health literacy; GDRS; HLS-EU-Q16; POPULATION; UPDATE; SCORE;
D O I
10.1186/s12889-021-10508-2
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
BackgroundLow health literacy is believed to be associated with behaviours that increase the risk of type 2 diabetes. But there is limited knowledge on the relation between health literacy (HL) and diabetes risk, and whether improving HL could be a potential prevention strategy. Therefore, the main purpose of this study was to examine the link between HL and diabetes risk among non-diabetic adults.MethodsWe used data from the Hamburg Diabetes Prevention Survey, a population-based cross-sectional study in Germany. One thousand, two hundred and fifty-five non-diabetic subjects aged 18-60years were eligible. The German Diabetes Risk Score (GDRS, ranging 0 to 123 points) was used to determine the individual risk of type 2 diabetes. The short version of the European Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLS-EU-Q16, ranging 0 to 16 points) was applied to assess the individual self-reported HL. Subjects were asked to self-estimate their diabetes risk, which was then compared with the calculated GDRS. Descriptive statistics were calculated to investigate group differences in the GDRS and self-estimated diabetes risk. Linear as well as logistic regression models were performed to analyse potential influencing variables of the GDRS as well as incorrect self-estimated diabetes risk. In three nested statistical models for each outcome, these analyses were adjusted for age, gender, educational level and the presence of chronic conditions.ResultsAccording to the criteria of the GDRS, 996 (79.4%) subjects showed "low risk", 176 (14.0%) "still low risk", 53 (4.2%) "elevated risk", and 30 (2.4%) "high to very high risk" to develop type 2 diabetes within the next 5 years. In the statistical models including all control variables, subjects with "inadequate HL" scored 2.38 points higher on the GDRS (95% CI 0.378 to 4.336; P=0.020) and had a 2.04 greater chance to estimate their diabetes risk incorrectly (OR 2.04; 95% CI 1.33 to 3.14; P=0.001) compared to those with "sufficient HL".ConclusionThe risk of type 2 diabetes is increased in people with inadequate self-reported HL. People with high diabetes risk and inadequate HL might be provided with educational programs to improve diabetes knowledge and reduce behavioural risk factors.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
ADM, BUS ASS GERM MARK SO
[2]   Health Literacy and Health Outcomes in Diabetes: A Systematic Review [J].
Al Sayah, Fatima ;
Majumdar, Sumit R. ;
Williams, Beverly ;
Robertson, Sandy ;
Johnson, Jeffrey A. .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2013, 28 (03) :444-452
[3]   Metabolic syndrome - a new world-wide definition. A consensus statement from the international diabetes federation [J].
Alberti, KGMM ;
Zimmet, P ;
Shaw, J .
DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2006, 23 (05) :469-480
[4]  
[Anonymous], CONSORTIUM H E HLS E
[5]  
[Anonymous], IDF Diabetes Atlas
[6]   Health literacy among different age groups in Germany: results of a cross-sectional survey [J].
Berens, Eva-Maria ;
Vogt, Dominique ;
Messer, Melanie ;
Hurrelmann, Klaus ;
Schaeffer, Doris .
BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2016, 16 :1-8
[7]  
Brauns H., 1999, ZUMA-Nachrichten, V44, P7
[8]   Gout and the risk of type 2 diabetes among men with a high cardiovascular risk profile [J].
Choi, H. K. ;
De Vera, M. A. ;
Krishnan, E. .
RHEUMATOLOGY, 2008, 47 (10) :1567-1570
[9]  
Cronbach LJ, 1951, PSYCHOMETRIKA, V16, P297
[10]   The STROBE guidelines [J].
Cuschieri, Sarah .
SAUDI JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2019, 13 :31-34