Systematic review: standard- and double-dose proton pump inhibitors for the healing of severe erosive oesophagitis - a mixed treatment comparison of randomized controlled trials

被引:29
作者
Edwards, S. J. [1 ]
Lind, T. [2 ]
Lundell, L. [3 ]
Das, R. [1 ]
机构
[1] AstraZeneca UK Ltd, Outcomes Res, Luton LU1 3LU, Beds, England
[2] AstraZeneca R&D, Molndal, Sweden
[3] Karolinska Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
GASTROESOPHAGEAL-REFLUX DISEASE; ESOMEPRAZOLE; 40; MG; 24-HOUR INTRAGASTRIC PH; LANSOPRAZOLE; 30; OMEPRAZOLE; 20; SYMPTOM RELIEF; DOUBLE-BLIND; GRADE II; EFFICACY; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2036.2009.04077.x
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
P>Background No randomized controlled trial (RCT) has compared all European-licensed standard- and double-dose PPIs for the healing of severe erosive oesophagitis. Aim To compare the effectiveness of licensed doses of PPIs for healing severe erosive oesophagitis (i.e. esomeprazole 40 mg, lansoprazole 30 mg, omeprazole 20 mg and 40 mg, pantoprazole 40 mg and rabeprazole 20 mg). Methods Systematic review of CENTRAL, EMBASE and MEDLINE for RCTs in patients with erosive oesophagitis (completed October 2008). Endoscopically verified healing rates at 4 and 8 weeks were extracted and re-calculated if not analysed by intention-to-treat. A mixed treatment comparison was used to combine direct treatment comparisons with indirect trial evidence while maintaining randomization. Odds ratios (OR) are reported compared to omeprazole 20 mg. Results A total of 3021 papers were identified in the literature search; 12 were of sufficient quality to be included in the analysis. Insufficient data were available to included rabeprazole. Esomeprazole 40 mg was found to provide significantly higher healing rates at 4 weeks [OR 1.84, 95% Credible Interval (95% CrI): 1.50 to 2.22] and 8 weeks (OR 1.91, 95% CrI: 1.13 to 2.88). No other PPI investigated had significantly higher healing rates than omeprazole 20 mg. Conclusion Esomeprazole 40 mg consistently demonstrates higher healing rates compared with licensed standard- and double-dose PPIs.
引用
收藏
页码:547 / 556
页数:10
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   Symptom relief in patients with reflux esophagitis: Comparative study of omeprazole, lansoprazole, and rabeprazole [J].
Adachi, K ;
Hashimoto, T ;
Hamamoto, N ;
Hirakawa, K ;
Niigaki, M ;
Miyake, T ;
Taniura, H ;
Ono, M ;
Kaji, T ;
Suetsugu, H ;
Yagi, J ;
Komazawa, Y ;
Mihara, T ;
Katsube, T ;
Fujishiro, H ;
Shizuku, T ;
Hattori, S ;
Yamamoto, S ;
Kinoshita, Y .
JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2003, 18 (12) :1392-1398
[2]   A chain of evidence with mixed comparisons: models for multi-parameter synthesis and consistency of evidence [J].
Ades, AE .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2003, 22 (19) :2995-3016
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Guide to the methods of technology appraisal
[4]  
BARDHAN KD, 1995, ALIMENT PHARM THERAP, V9, P145
[5]  
BATE CM, 1993, ALIMENT PHARM THERAP, V7, P501
[6]   The results of direct and indirect treatment comparisons in meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [J].
Bucher, HC ;
Guyatt, GH ;
Griffith, LE ;
Walter, SD .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1997, 50 (06) :683-691
[7]   Simultaneous comparison of multiple treatments: combining direct and indirect evidence [J].
Caldwell, DM ;
Ades, AE ;
Higgins, JPT .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2005, 331 (7521) :897-900
[8]  
Castell DO, 2002, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V97, P575
[9]  
Castell DO, 1996, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V91, P1749
[10]   Speed of healing and symptom relief in grade II to IV gastroesophageal reflux disease: A meta-analysis [J].
Chiba, N ;
DeGara, CJ ;
Wilkinson, JM ;
Hunt, RH .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1997, 112 (06) :1798-1810