Incorporating biotic relationships improves species distribution models: Modeling the temporal influence of competition in conspecific nesting birds

被引:13
|
作者
Fern, Rachel R. [1 ]
Morrison, Michael L. [1 ]
Wang, Hsiao-Hsuan [1 ]
Grant, William E. [1 ]
Campbell, Tyler A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Wildlife & Fisheries Sci, College Stn, TX 77845 USA
[2] East Fdn, San Antonio, TX 78216 USA
关键词
Biotic interactions; Birds; Cactus wren; Competition; Nesting; Species distribution model; Predation; Verdin; RANDOM FORESTS; SELECTION; PREDICTION; DIVERSITY; SITES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2019.108743
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Aim: Complex, biotic interactions are notably excluded from species distribution models (SDMs) as they are often difficult to quantify and accommodate in a traditional modeling framework, especially those with a temporal component. The territorial nature of breeding Cactus wren is well-documented and typically involves nest usurping (i.e., destruction) of conspecifics. Due to their similar nesting ecology, breeding Verdin are frequently the target of such behavior and are often forced to move or abandon nests. Using the Verdin/Cactus wren system as a case study, our goal was to evaluate the performance of SDMs that include only environmental predictors with SDMs that also include biotic relationships as predictors. Location: East Foundation's San Antonio Viejo Ranch in south Texas. Methods: We built SDMs (MaxEnt, Boosted Regression Tree [BRT], and Random Forest [RF]) to project Verdin distribution during the early (April through mid-May), peak (mid-May through mid-June), and late (mid-June through mid-July) breeding periods using occurrence data collected during the 2015 and 2016 breeding seasons. We ran parallel analyses using relevant environmental features alone as predictors and then environmental features with observed Cactus wren density. Results: Random Forest (RF) produced the highest predictive performance SDMs for all three breeding periods (AUC = 0.81-0.99; TSS = 0.23-0.73). All models improved in predictive power (Delta AUC = 0.01-0.10) and model sensitivity (Delta TSS = 0.09-0.66) with the inclusion of Cactus wren density as a predictor of Verdin presence. Main conclusions: Our results indicate that SDM performance is improved by the inclusion of biotic relationships as predictors. Incorporating biotic interactions, as well as their temporal trends, is essential in efforts to monitor or conserve bird species with similar nesting ecologies. Further, modeling algorithms that can accommodate complex, non-linear relationships (e.g., Random Forest) should be preferred in SDM development and application.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 11 条
  • [1] Incorporating Biotic Information in Species Distribution Models: A Coregionalized Approach
    Barber, Xavier
    Conesa, David
    Lopez-Quilez, Antonio
    Martinez-Minaya, Joaquin
    Paradinas, Iosu
    Pennino, Maria Grazia
    MATHEMATICS, 2021, 9 (04) : 1 - 12
  • [2] Incorporating biotic factors in species distribution modeling: are interactions with soil microbes important?
    de Mesquita, Clifton P. Bueno
    King, Andrew J.
    Schmidt, Steven K.
    Farrer, Emily C.
    Suding, Katharine N.
    ECOGRAPHY, 2016, 39 (10) : 970 - 980
  • [3] Incorporating reef fish avoidance behavior improves accuracy of species distribution models
    Stamoulis, Kostantinos A.
    Delevaux, Jade M. S.
    Williams, Ivor D.
    Friedlander, Alan M.
    Reichard, Jake
    Kamikawa, Keith
    Harvey, Euan S.
    PEERJ, 2020, 8
  • [4] Incorporating functional connectivity into species distribution models improves the prediction of invasiveness of an exotic species not at niche equilibrium
    Pereira, Pedro Filipe
    Valerio, Francesco
    Lourenco, Rui
    BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS, 2023, 25 (11) : 3517 - 3533
  • [5] Incorporating intraspecific variation into species distribution models improves distribution predictions, but cannot predict species traits for a wide-spread plant species
    Chardon, Nathalie Isabelle
    Pironon, Samuel
    Peterson, Megan Lynn
    Doak, Daniel Forest
    ECOGRAPHY, 2020, 43 (01) : 60 - 74
  • [6] Incorporating stochasticity from extreme climatic events and multi-species competition relationships into single-tree mortality models
    Manso, Ruben
    Morneau, Francois
    Ningre, Francois
    Fortin, Mathieu
    FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2015, 354 : 243 - 253
  • [7] Incorporating interspecific relationships into species distribution models can better assess the response of species to climate change, a case study of two Chinese primates
    Ye, Xiulin
    Wu, Qing
    Li, Xinrui
    Zhao, Xumao
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2022, 142
  • [8] Incorporating biotic interactions in the distribution models of African wild silk moths (⁢Gonometa ⁢species, Lasiocampidae) using different representations of modelled host tree distributions
    Raath, Morgan Jade
    Le Roux, Peter Christiaan
    Veldtman, Ruan
    Greve, Michelle
    AUSTRAL ECOLOGY, 2018, 43 (03) : 316 - 327
  • [9] Spatio-temporal integrated Bayesian species distribution models reveal lack of broad relationships between traits and range shifts
    Wiethase, Joris H.
    Mostert, Philip S.
    Cooney, Christopher R.
    O'Hara, Robert B.
    Beale, Colin M.
    GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY, 2024, 33 (05):
  • [10] Do community-level models account for the effects of biotic interactions? A comparison of community-level and species distribution modeling of Rocky Mountain conifers
    Copenhaver-Parry, Paige E.
    Albeke, Shannon E.
    Tinker, Daniel B.
    PLANT ECOLOGY, 2016, 217 (05) : 533 - 547