Proton-pump inhibitors for stress ulcer prophylaxis in critically ill patients

被引:11
作者
Jung, R [1 ]
MacLaren, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Hlth Sci Ctr, Sch Pharm, Dept Pharm Practice, Denver, CO 80262 USA
关键词
proton-pump inhibitors; prophylaxis; stress ulcer;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) for stress ulcer prophylaxis in critically ill adults. DATA SOURCES: Computerized biomedical literature search of MEDLINE (1966-June 2002) was conducted using the MeSH headings proton-pump inhibitor, ulcer, critical care, and acid. References of selected articles were reviewed. A manual search of critical care, surgery, trauma, gastrointestinal, and pharmacy journals was conducted to identify relevant abstracts. DATA SYNTHESIS: Traditional medications used for stress ulcer prophylaxis include antacids, histamine(2) receptor antagonists (H2RAs), and sucralfate. Few studies have evaluated PPIs for stress ulcer prophylaxis. The majority of studies have demonstrated that enteral or intravenous administration of PPIs to critically ill patients elevates intragastric pH and consistently maintains pH greater than or equal to4.0. PPIs are safe and seem to be as efficacious as H2RAs or sucralfate for prevention of bleeding from stress-related mucosal damage (SRMD) and they may provide cost minimization. The small patient populations limit the results of comparative studies. CONCLUSIONS: Available data indicate that PPIs are safe and efficacious for elevating intragastric pH in critically ill patients. PPIs should be used only as an alternative to H2RAs or sucralfate since the superiority of PPIs over these agents for preventing SRMD-associated gastrointestinal bleeding has not been established. Additional comparative studies with adequate patient numbers and pharmacoeconomic analyses are needed before PPIs are considered the agents of choice for stress ulcer prophylaxis.
引用
收藏
页码:1929 / 1937
页数:9
相关论文
共 52 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], BMJ
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1999, AM ERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH SYSTEM PHARMACY, V56, P347, DOI DOI 10.1093/AJHP/56.4.347
  • [3] COMPARISON OF THE EFFECT OF INTERMITTENT ADMINISTRATION AND CONTINUOUS-INFUSION OF FAMOTIDINE ON GASTRIC PH IN CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS - RESULTS OF A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED, CROSSOVER STUDY
    BAGHAIE, AA
    MOJTAHEDZADEH, M
    LEVINE, RL
    FROMM, RE
    GUNTUPALLI, KK
    OPEKUN, AR
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1995, 23 (04) : 687 - 691
  • [4] Balaban DH, 1997, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V92, P79
  • [5] Prophylaxis for stress-related gastrointestinal hemorrhage: A cost effectiveness analysis
    BenMenachem, T
    McCarthy, BD
    Fogel, R
    Schiffman, RM
    Patel, RV
    Zarowitz, BJ
    Nerenz, DR
    Bresalier, RS
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1996, 24 (02) : 338 - 345
  • [6] Clinical utility of pH paper versus pH meter in the measurement of critical gastric pH in stress ulcer prophylaxis
    Bradley, JS
    Phillips, JO
    Cavanaugh, JE
    Metzler, MH
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1998, 26 (11) : 1905 - 1909
  • [7] PROSPECTIVE-STUDY OF CLINICAL BLEEDING IN INTENSIVE-CARE UNIT PATIENTS
    BROWN, RB
    KLAR, J
    TERES, D
    LEMESHOW, S
    SANDS, M
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1988, 16 (12) : 1171 - 1176
  • [8] Cohen H, 2000, CRIT CARE MED, V28, pA185
  • [9] A comparison of sucralfate and ranitidine for the prevention of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients requiring mechanical ventilation
    Cook, D
    Guyatt, G
    Marshall, J
    Leasa, D
    Fuller, H
    Hall, R
    Peters, S
    Rutledge, F
    Griffith, L
    McLellan, A
    Wood, G
    Kirby, A
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1998, 338 (12) : 791 - 797
  • [10] Risk factors for clinically important upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients requiring mechanical ventilation
    Cook, D
    Heyland, D
    Griffith, L
    Cook, R
    Marshall, J
    Pagliarello, J
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1999, 27 (12) : 2812 - 2817