Comparison of the effect of teicoplanin and vancomycin on experimental methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus keratitis

被引:6
作者
Ucgul, Ahmet Yucel [1 ]
Behcet, Mustafa [2 ]
机构
[1] Abant Izzet Baysal Univ, Training & Res Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Kilicarslan Mah 144,Sk 7-6 Merkez, Bolu, Turkey
[2] Abant Izzet Baysal Univ, Training & Res Hosp, Dept Med Microbiol, Bolu, Turkey
关键词
Keratitis; Methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus; Teicoplanin; Vancomycin;
D O I
10.1007/s10792-021-01696-2
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose To evaluate the early efficacy and safety of intrastromal injection of teicoplanin as the alternative treatment for the methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) keratitis by comparing it with vancomycin. Materials and methods Twenty-four eyes of 24 New Zealand white rabbits were included in the study. MRSA keratitis was induced in the right eye of each rabbit by injecting 0.1 mL MRSA suspension containing 1000 colony-forming units (CFU) intrastromally to the central cornea. The rabbits were divided into three treatment groups 24 h after the inoculation of MRSA. Eight rabbits received intrastromal teicoplanin therapy, eight received intrastromal vancomycin therapy, and eight received balanced salt solution and served as the control group. Nine hours after the treatment, all rabbits were sacrificed and corneal tissues were collected for microbiological analysis. We also examined and scored all the rabbits clinically before and after the treatment. Results The control group scored higher with regard to conjunctival injection, iritis, fibrin, hypopyon, epithelial erosion, and corneal infiltrate than the vancomycin and teicoplanin groups (p = 0.031, 0.010, < 0.001, 0.029, 0.009, and < 0.001, respectively). Chemosis and corneal oedema were similar in all groups (p = 0.731 and 0.075, respectively). The severity of all clinical parameters was similar in both the vancomycin and teicoplanin groups after the treatment. The bacterial load was the highest (7.83 +/- 0.71 log(10) CFU/g) in the control group. The eyes treated with vancomycin and teicoplanin had similar bacterial loads (6.40 +/- 0.69 vs. 6.31 +/- 0.75 log(10) CFU/g, p = 0.809). Conclusion The efficiency of teicoplanin seems to be comparable to that of vancomycin when administered intrastromally in the early treatment of MRSA keratitis. The former may be preferred in the treatment of selected cases with vancomycin hypersensitivity or resistance.
引用
收藏
页码:1395 / 1402
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of the effect of teicoplanin and vancomycin on experimental methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus keratitis
    Ahmet Yucel Ucgul
    Mustafa Behcet
    International Ophthalmology, 2021, 41 : 1395 - 1402
  • [2] In Vitro Susceptibility of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates to Vancomycin, Teicoplanin, Linezolide and Daptomycin
    Celikbilek, Nevreste
    Ozdem, Birsen
    Gurelik, Feryal C.
    Guvenman, Selda
    Guner, H. Rahmet
    Acikgoz, Ziya Cibali
    MIKROBIYOLOJI BULTENI, 2011, 45 (03): : 512 - 518
  • [3] Vancomycin versus teicoplanin in the therapy of experimental methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) meningitis
    Sipahi, OR
    Arda, B
    Yurtseven, T
    Sipahi, H
    Ozgiray, E
    Suntur, BM
    Ulusoy, S
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2005, 26 (05) : 412 - 415
  • [4] Comparison of mortality and clinical failure rates between vancomycin and teicoplanin in patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia
    Lee, Jang Ho
    Choi, Myeong Geun
    Park, Hyung Jun
    Kim, Ho Cheol
    Choi, Chang-Min
    BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [5] Vancomycin, teicoplanin, daptomycin, and linezolid MIC creep in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus is associated with clonality
    Hsieh, Yu-Chia
    Lin, Yu-Chun
    Huang, Yhu-Chering
    MEDICINE, 2016, 95 (41)
  • [6] In vitro combined effects of cefozopran/teicoplanin and cefozopran/vancomycin on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
    Toyokawa, M
    Asari, S
    Nishi, I
    Horikawa, M
    Tsukamoto, H
    Sunada, A
    Ueda, A
    Iwatani, Y
    JOURNAL OF CHEMOTHERAPY, 2003, 15 (01) : 31 - 36
  • [7] Teicoplanin combined with conventional vancomycin therapy for the treatment of pulmonary methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis infections
    Wu, Wei
    Liu, Min
    Geng, Jia-Jing
    Wang, Mei
    WORLD JOURNAL OF CLINICAL CASES, 2021, 9 (34) : 10549 - 10556
  • [8] Comparison of the Effect of Different Treatment Doses of Intrastromal Vancomycin in a Rabbit Model of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) Keratitis
    Bayrak, Abdullah
    Celebi, Serdal
    Avcioglu, Fatma
    Alkan, Yunus
    OCULAR IMMUNOLOGY AND INFLAMMATION, 2024, 32 (10) : 2405 - 2410
  • [9] Intrastromal Administration of Vancomycin to Maximize Its Early Effect on Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Keratitis: A Rabbit Study
    Ucgul, Ahmet Yucel
    Ucgul, Rukiye Kilic
    Behcet, Mustafa
    OCULAR IMMUNOLOGY AND INFLAMMATION, 2022, 30 (06) : 1430 - 1435
  • [10] Comparison of mortality and clinical failure rates between vancomycin and teicoplanin in patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia
    Jang Ho Lee
    Myeong Geun Choi
    Hyung Jun Park
    Ho Cheol Kim
    Chang-Min Choi
    BMC Infectious Diseases, 22